Green Taxes 'Should Reduce Fares'

First Posted: 07/07/11 09:09 Updated: 05/09/11 11:12

Transport

PRESS ASSOCIATION - The Treasury should ring-fence money from fuel duty to cut rising public transport fares in a bid to rebuild trust in green taxes, MPs have urged.

The public has lost trust in green taxation because the Treasury appears to use it as a revenue-raiser rather than an effort to reduce pollution, said the Environmental Audit Committee.

Recent Government budgets had created the perception that taxes on things such as flights and fuel were "simply being used to pinch extra pennies from people", said the committee's chairwoman Joan Walley.

In a report on this year's budget and environmental taxes, the committee said the Treasury should ring-fence some of the revenues from green taxation to invest in less-polluting alternatives. For example, funding raised from fuel duty should go towards lower bus and train fares.

Green taxation "cannot be all stick and no carrots", the report said. The committee criticised the announcement in the most recent Budget to cut a penny from fuel duty, in the face of rising petrol prices, while providing no new incentives for switching to low-carbon alternatives such as electric cars.

Ms Walley said: "Green taxes shouldn't be seen as some kind of add-on or used as a revenue-raising trick - they should form an integral part of the Government's plans to revive the economy. The Treasury should start to rebuild trust in environmental taxes by ring-fencing some of the revenues raised from fuel duty to cut soaring train and bus fares."

The report, which examined the environmental impact of this year's budget, also said the Treasury's decision to prevent the proposed green investment bank from borrowing would limit its impact on boosting renewables and greening homes. And it criticised the Government's definition of subsidies for nuclear power, warning new reactors would effectively be subsidised.

Sian Berry, of the Campaign for Better Transport, said: "A decade ago Gordon Brown promised that future increases in fuel duty would be ring-fenced for modernising transport. Unfortunately this was never put into effect. The coalition Government should learn from this and commit to using increases in revenue from fuel duty as part of a wider package of measures to provide real choices in transport."

A Treasury spokesman said: "The Government is committed to being the greenest government ever, as seen by actions at Budget and the plans to set environmental taxes in a clear and accountable framework. The Government welcomes the committee's report and will respond to its recommendations in due course.

"As stated by the Chancellor at Budget, environmental tax policy is being developed in a way that takes account of all possible levers so that carbon reduction is done in the most effective way and takes account of wider priorities such as sustainable growth and sound public finances."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK

PRESS ASSOCIATION - The Treasury should ring-fence money from fuel duty to cut rising public transport fares in a bid to rebuild trust in green taxes, MPs have urged. The public has lost trust in g...
PRESS ASSOCIATION - The Treasury should ring-fence money from fuel duty to cut rising public transport fares in a bid to rebuild trust in green taxes, MPs have urged. The public has lost trust in g...
Filed by Dina Rickman  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 3
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
01:57 on 08/07/2011
The problem with British railways is the fact that any private company getting involved will never have the cash to invest in the system enough to the scale that is required to provide the UK with a brand new rail netework that is fit for the 21st century. In my area we are actually loosing carriages during rush hour it doesnt make any sense! We do need greater investment in the railways but if it means subidising somebody elses dividend, id rather we didnt.
12:22 on 07/07/2011
No tax money seems to get ring-fenced or saved – there never seems to be a sensible, sustainable plan we can all see. Instead it all appears to go into a giant slosh bucket with lots of holes in it. Spin, smoke and mirrors are no way to run your finances.

Look at the previous work experience of the Prime Minister (TV PR man), Chancellor of the Exchequer (no previous job) and Chief Secretary to the Treasury (Press Officer for the Cairngorms National Park); hardly an appropriate preparation for their new roles when the UK is in the eye of the storm of a major economic crisis.

Can we have a party and politicians with some knowledge, energy, vision and long-term planning please?
11:44 on 07/07/2011
This is a good report from the Environmental Audit Committee, but it says nothing that hasn't been said before. The problem we have with green taxes is that its purpose has constantly and deliberately been misunderstood by the Treasury. Why? Because they hate the concept of taxes being raised for any other purpose than providing income to the exchequer. Green taxes have a different purpose. Yes to raise funds. But to do so in order to change behaviour. So it is right that you have to link the money raised with the provision of alternatives to help us all make the behaviour changes needed. Of course doing this shift the control of how our taxes are spent to us and away from Government. It doing so it forges a new contract between people and the state based upon clear objectives and clear accountability. Dangerous stuff for the Treasury and Government.