Joanna Yeates' Landlord Accepts Payout From Papers

Chris

Huffington Post UK   First Posted: 29/07/11 12:39 BST Updated: 28/09/11 11:12 BST

The former landlord of murder victim Joanna Yeates has accepted a substantial undisclosed payout from eight newspapers.

Chris Jefferies took the papers to court over allegations they made about him following his arrest over Yeates' death. He was subsequently released without charge.

The former teacher's lawyer Louis Charalambous said the Sun, the Daily Mirror, the Sunday Mirror, the Daily Mail, the Daily Record, the Daily Express, the Daily Star and the Scotsman had made "seriously defamatory" allegations against him.

The newspapers have agreed to apologise.

In a statement made outside court on Friday his lawyer said: "Christopher Jefferies is the latest victim of the regular witch hunts and character assassination conducted by the worst elements of the British tabloid media.

"Many of the stories published in these newspapers are designed to 'monster' the individual, in flagrant disregard for his reputation, privacy and rights to a fair trial.

"These newspapers have now apologised to him and paid substantial damages but they do so knowing that once the conditional fee agreement rules are changed next year victims of tabloid witch hunts will no longer have the same access to justice."

In a separate case, the Sun and the Mirror have also been accused of contempt of court over coverage of the murder.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK

The former landlord of murder victim Joanna Yeates has accepted a substantial undisclosed payout from eight newspapers. Chris Jefferies took the papers to court over allegations they made about him...
The former landlord of murder victim Joanna Yeates has accepted a substantial undisclosed payout from eight newspapers. Chris Jefferies took the papers to court over allegations they made about him...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 19
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
04:53 PM on 07/30/2011
No suprises there, the police get it wrong all the time, I think they watch to many "who dun it"shows on TV, Next time get "Frost" in, hes the man for the job,Or go to the nearest primary school and, give the kids all the evidence you have then ask them "Who Dun It", That would have saved a lot of time and police wages, Or do they (as ive always suspected), play it out for as long as they can, putting there feet up at home instead of knocking on doors etc, etc, the mind boggles.
02:50 PM on 07/30/2011
The fines on the newspapers seemed very small. This man was put through hell.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Derek Lantin
Writer.
02:28 PM on 07/30/2011
Sir

That is excellent news. The press had a field day with this man. One remembers their descriptions of how he dyed his hair blue and wore moccasin shoes, - as if that alone was proof of his guilt.

Just as bad was the shabby treatment by the police who gleefully arrested the man without having a shred of evidence against him. Presumably they police were simply trying to fill their quota of arrests for the day, - with no regard for the damage done to the man’s reputation.

Perhaps the police should wait until they have some proof before arresting people? Perhaps the police could at least use some common sense, - after all, is a retired school teacher who is chairman of the local Neighborhood Watch Committee, a likely murder suspect?

Sincerely, Derek Lantin. http://dereklantin.booksabuzz.com
02:52 PM on 07/30/2011
Police have been watching ''Midsomer Murders'' too often. Fines on Newspapers seemed low.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Derek Lantin
Writer.
08:13 PM on 07/30/2011
I agree. The fines bear no relation to the benefit.
The UK police seem to have lost the plot.. Regards, Derek
11:04 AM on 07/30/2011
This is very good for Mr Yeates, i read those same reports that he did, and thought, what will his former students think of him after seeing this?
01:48 AM on 07/30/2011
It is very scary how the power of the Press can find someone who is innocent as 'guilty' before they even appear in court, thus perverting the course of justice. I wonder if anyone who has ever been in the same situation in the past, has successfully sued the 'guilty' newspapers; or is this a first? I am not refering to celebrity weddings or indiscretions.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paul Houston
British and a London resident
10:02 PM on 07/29/2011
Here is the court judgment relating to the contempt of court brought by the Attorney General against the "Sun" and the "Mirror"

http://www.judiciary.gov.uk/Resources/JCO/Documents/Judgments/hmag-v-mgn-and-news-group.pdf
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paul Houston
British and a London resident
09:56 PM on 07/29/2011
Good! This man was totally vilified by he tabloids, he deserves the compensation. The only way the press may learn to act responsibly is if they get hit often and hard.
01:41 PM on 07/30/2011
Yeah but the issue here is that the papers make millions from these stories and then get fines a tenth of that. And the journos are laughing all the way down to the pub with fat bonus cheques in their hand. Until people get sent to prison for this kind of thing,nothing is going to change. I am hoping that the contempt of court cases here may result in criminal prosecutions of individuals not businesses.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Derek Lantin
Writer.
02:18 PM on 07/30/2011
I agree.
07:35 PM on 07/29/2011
The way the tabloids dragged this man's name through the mud was one of the worst examples of journalism I have ever seen. He deserves every penny he gets from those muck-raking papers.
A weaker person may have caved in and goodness knows what might have happened to him. As it is, His background was laid bare, stories were fabricated and his whole life was turned upside down.
How much longer are we going to allow these so called "news" papers to operate the way they do. A further question - How did the papers pick up on this man in the first place. Presumably they got the information yet again from the police.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
propitiousmoment
the journey is the destination....
01:25 PM on 07/29/2011
Cost of doing business, that's all it is for them.
01:19 PM on 07/29/2011
Individuals and corporations support unethical media with their purchase and advertising.

Are advertisers proud of their association?
01:17 PM on 07/29/2011
What ever happened to ethics in journalism?

What ever happened to ethics in business?

It might be time that an ethics class be taught in school.

The greed is good gang wants it all.
12:48 PM on 07/29/2011
Good for him. And no confidentiality or stay quiet clauses please. Let's hear him tell these bustards what they do not like hearing.
12:24 PM on 07/29/2011
I thought he should also be looking for something from the TV companies. I clearly recall the BBC News showing plenty of pictures identifying him, and discussing his background, etc, with little or no reference to the fact that he was just being questioned.

Their presentation suggested he was the culprit. They joined the witch hunt, but have got away with it - why?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tim Haselden
An Enemy of Rupert Murdoch, since 1984.
12:06 PM on 07/29/2011
Wonder if this guy had his phone hacked?
04:16 PM on 07/29/2011
You beat me to it Tim!

At the time I had the feeling it was a race for who would find the killer between the press and the police. Good to see the police won that or at least got the right man.
But I have to agree with his lawyer's statement about him being targetted and more or less put on trial by the press probably as his face didn't look right and as he lived in the same house then it must have been him.