Military Action In Syria Impossible, Says Foreign Secretary

Hague Syria

First Posted: 01/08/11 09:25 BST Updated: 30/09/11 11:12 BST

The foreign secretary William Hague has ruled out any possibility of western countries taking military action in Syria, despite the human rights atrocities which have taken place there over the weekend.

Hague told the Today programme on Radio 4: "It is a very frustrating situation, the levers we have are very limited." He said military action was "not a remote possibility. Even if we were in favour of that.. there is no prospect of a legal, morally sanctioned military intervention."

Faced with accusations that the UK had intervened in Libya but was now failing to respond to similar human rights outrages in Syria, Hague said it was a 'different situation'. He indicated Britain would be pushing for greater diplomatic pressure on Damascus, saying: "We do want to see additional sanctions and have agreed a further round of sanctions in the EU which will be announced later this week.

"We will continue working on this today. I would like to see a UN security council resolution to condemn this violence.

"There are nations on the security council opposed to any resolution, so we will revisit that in the coming hours and days."

More than 100 people were killed during a crackdown in the Syrian city of Hama on Sunday. One report from the AFP agency suggested as many as 130 people may have been killed, but reports are sketchy because foreign reporters are banned from working in Syria.

The Syrian government moved to quell rebel activity in the city ahead of the holy Muslim month of Ramadan, which begins today.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK POLITICS

The foreign secretary William Hague has ruled out any possibility of western countries taking military action in Syria, despite the human rights atrocities which have taken place there over the weeken...
The foreign secretary William Hague has ruled out any possibility of western countries taking military action in Syria, despite the human rights atrocities which have taken place there over the weeken...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 22
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
11:33 PM on 08/02/2011
We should remember here that William Hague was deeply sceptical about the merits of any western military intervention in Libya. He had sound reasons to be sceptical.
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
03:53 PM on 08/02/2011
He didn't have much choice.

Both RAF bicycles are fully engaged in Libya.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:35 PM on 08/02/2011
Let's not forget something else: the Syrians can shoot back.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mediumal57
Moderate Extremist
05:25 AM on 08/02/2011
Well there's a relief to the Syrian Government. Do you think they were unduly worried? We can't as a Nation afford the paltry military machine we already have got to do all the world policing we've committed ourselves to. So expecting any more from them would appear a little over-optimistic - wouldn't you say?

One gets the notion that Hague ruling out military intervention in Syria is a little like someone who is skint saying to his mates in the pub when it's his round: "Do you know I think I'll forgo that pint" - and excuses himself and pops off home instead.
11:34 PM on 08/02/2011
medium - - Hague is expressing both common sense, and a fact of the matter: neither China nor Russia would allow a UNSC resolution on Syria at this time.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
omobob
left coast, usa
04:47 AM on 08/02/2011
> Faced with accusations that the UK had intervened in Libya but was now failing to respond to similar human rights outrages in Syria, Hague said it was a 'different situation'.

Yes, quite different. Then NATO would be bombing and killing Syrians as opposed to Libyans, a different matter entirely? Unless you happen to be one of the unfortunate souls to be caught in a bombing raid. Hard to imagine greater indifference to human suffering.
11:35 PM on 08/02/2011
omo - - Are you arguing the UK should attack Syrian government forces?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Derek Lantin
Writer.
06:35 PM on 08/01/2011
Sir

One must ask if anyone had seriously even contemplated the idea of taking military action against Syria.

Surely it is clear to all that the UK is now so enfeebled that it can barely afford the cost of being involved in Afghanistan and Libya, - let alone a third campaign in Syria.

Sincerely, Derek Lantin. http://dereklantin.booksabuzz.com
11:37 PM on 08/02/2011
Derek - - Unlike the US, Britain is doing something to cut back on spending on "defence". By contrast, idiotic squandering of hundreds of billions of dollars, by the US, goes on year after year after year.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Derek Lantin
Writer.
05:45 AM on 08/03/2011
Very god point. I realise that with power comes responsibility, butI fail to see why the USA should be the World's policeman.
03:10 PM on 08/01/2011
These people always ask "why not (insert name here)?" Yet they do not ask with what we will conduct this magic casualty free war with! The UK and US are fed up of fixing everyone elses problems. We cant fix everything!
05:34 PM on 08/01/2011
US/UK/NATO intervention doesn't FIX problems, it CAUSES them.
11:38 PM on 08/02/2011
Une - - It is quite possible the "western" military intervention in Libya will create a disaster. Certainly, the US (and UK) created a disaster in Iraq. Most of the credit for that idiocy goes to the US.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Peter Speight
10:20 PM on 08/01/2011
Tell me ONE problem that the UK and US have fixed!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:44 PM on 08/01/2011
The Soviet Union.
11:39 PM on 08/02/2011
Peter - - Gulf War in 1991 was well-planned and executed. And successful because G H W Bush did not exceed the terms of the UNSC resolution.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JavaJuice
11:55 AM on 08/01/2011
The West is damned if they do, damned if we don't.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Peter Speight
10:21 PM on 08/01/2011
Serves us right for being addicted to oil, removing one dictator, installing another dictator. Our government has no morals.