Lib Dems Criticise Riot Sentences Say As Facebook Pair Get Four Years In Jail

Huffington Post UK    
First Posted: 17/08/11 09:21 BST Updated: 16/10/11 11:12 BST

Liberal Democrats and justice groups have questioned some of the tough sentences handed down to riot offenders after two men were jailed for four years each for attempting to incite a riot on Facebook.

The party's home affairs spokesman, Tom Brake, said sentencing should not be about "retribution".

"Clearly there are cases where offenders who have committed very serious crimes should expect very serious sentences and that is what I expect to happen. But there have been some cases where people who have committed petty offences have received sentences which, if they had committed the same offence the day before the riots, they would not have received a sentence of that nature.

"This should be about restorative justice, in other words making people acknowledge the offences they have committed and preferably if the victims want it, actually sit down face to face with the victims so they can hear from the victims the impact they have had, but it should not be about retribution", he told Newsnight.

Tessa Munt, the MP for Wells, told the Guardian the plans were "bonkers, bonkers, bonkers" and only served to make headlines instead of "calm, rational policy-making".

Another senior Liberal Democrat, the party's home affairs spokeswoman in the House of Lords, Lady Hamwee, also told the paper there should be "zero tolerance for zero tolerance".

Their comments came as a spokesperson for the Howard League For Penal Reform told the Times there was a "complete lack of proportionality" in some cases.

But Eric Pickles, the Communities Secretary, told BBC Radio 5 Live that "these kind of exemplary sentences are necessary".

"I think we need to understand that people for a while thought that this was a crime without consequence. We cannot have people being frightened in their beds, frightened in their own homes for their public safety," he said on Wednesday.

Conservative MP Margot James also defended the sentences, saying she hoped "judges would err on the side of severity for cases like these".

"I think the young men involved were inciting a riot, trying to organise a sort of mayhem that we saw on the streets eight nights ago in Salford, which would have put lives at risk, and at the very least they would have distracted the police from trying to deal with that crisis, and put a lot of fear into people," she told Newsnight.

On Tuesday Jordan Blackshaw, 21, from Northwich, and Perry Sutcliffe-Keenan, 22, from Warrington, were jailed at Chester crown court. on Tuesday.

The men had posted messages to the social network in an attempt to spread disorder that hit London and other cities in the UK last week.

Neither riots occured but the recorder of Chester, Elgin Edwards, said he hoped the sentences would act as a deterrent.

The Crown Prosecution Service defended the sentences, and said that the men had caused "significant panic and revulsion".

"They both used Facebook to organise and orchestrate serious disorder at a time when such incidents were taking place in other parts of the country. Both defendants, in Northwich and Warrington respectively, sought to gain widespread support in order to replicate similar criminality."

Assistant Chief Constable Phil Thompson added that the men had "struck fear into the hearts of communities".

"The sentences passed down today recognise how technology can be abused to incite criminal activity, and send a strong message to potential troublemakers about the extent to which ordinary people value safety and order in their lives and their communities."

Quick Poll

Are the riot sentences too harsh?

No, people need to be punished

Yes, it's disproportionate

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK POLITICS

Liberal Democrats and justice groups have questioned some of the tough sentences handed down to riot offenders after two men were jailed for four years each for attempting to incite a riot on Facebook...
Liberal Democrats and justice groups have questioned some of the tough sentences handed down to riot offenders after two men were jailed for four years each for attempting to incite a riot on Facebook...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 53
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Blockem1
When will our politicians start putting policies
10:46 AM on 08/18/2011
This whole exercise will cost the UK taxpayer over half a million and for what ! Call me Dave and co need a reality check
photo
Dahveed1
I have Flying Monkeys...
05:09 AM on 08/18/2011
These sentences will serve as a deterrent. The people that incite these riots are smart enough to make sure they will not use facebook or other social sites for this purpose.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:47 PM on 08/17/2011
This article is lacking in facts. What were the posts the put these two defendants in trouble, and could the crown prove the public responded to their call to arms, or did the call go unanswered because they had posted on their Facebook pages where the general public chose to ignored them. A little more facts, please, Huffington Post. I am only getting half the story, here.
01:09 AM on 08/18/2011
The two boys failed to cause any sort of rabble - nobody turned up! However, one of the reasons for the harsh sentence is the idea that it is right to 'send out a message'. However, a similar offender drew no incarceration http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/facebook/8706485/England-riots-teenager-freed-after-encouraging-vandalism-on-Facebook.html . As a consequence, I think that the establishment has become as much out of control as those who got caught up in the ground swell of violence and looting. And, the boys will certainly have grounds to appeal.
06:59 PM on 08/17/2011
Are these rioters any worse than English Soccer fans ?
06:43 PM on 08/17/2011
These riots are really the breakdown of civilisation. The strongest triumph, the weakest get beaten or robbed (see the videos of the theft of the scooter and mugging of the Malay student). Dress them in costumes and the rioters would fit into Mad Max.

Remember, someone sentenced to 4 years will serve less than 2.
Sentence someone to 2, they will serve probably 9 months.
06:01 PM on 08/17/2011
What is happening is they have been so lax for sooooo long the people commenting these types of crimes have decided they can do it and get away with it.
Some of the ones caught in this latest spree laugh and joke and have no remorse for the crimes they committed.

They have to start somewhere to make examples to show there will be consequences.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nete peedham
07:03 PM on 08/17/2011
When will people like Prime Minister Bullingdon-Club and London Mayor Bullingdon-Club be made "examples" of?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
floodberg
Attorney (ret.)
09:25 PM on 08/17/2011
Nete Peedham, we must all agree that the rioters and looters were lower/working class, who were in it due to a moral breakdown;  the rich kids involved - well, they were misled by bad company and 'issues,' which clearly was what led Cammie and Boris to both lie (in different ways) about their involvement and rewrite history (in print no less.)  I didn't really see any coverage of the ft.com bullingdon riot with Cam and Boris anywhere on British or US press, but I'm sure it's just 'courtesy.'  {sarcasm}
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LLCoolCal
05:09 PM on 08/17/2011
its a bit odd but im all for tougher sentences.
in fact give the actual rioters 4 years and give the inciters the 12/6 months that the criminals actually got.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
alsm9
Bombshell
04:48 PM on 08/17/2011
"But there have been some cases where people who have committed petty offences have received sentences which, if they had committed the same offence the day before the riots, they would not have received a sentence of that nature."

While I see the common sense in what is being said here, I have to say I think I weigh on the side of tougher sentencing. We aren't talking about an isolated petty crime, this is about getting caught up in that mob mentality that obviously is very dangerous. I think that needs to be addressed. So if you rob a store and steal a TV, ya, you probably won't get as much time as you would if you commit it in the context of a riot, because you are now contributing to the riot as well.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nete peedham
01:21 PM on 08/17/2011
Conservatives were quick to deny that their rhetoric had consequences; the killing of an abortion doctor in the US and the recent bombing and slayings in Norway were two examples.
Now they decide that what some witless goof posts on Facebook DOES have consequences.
Anyone see gross hypocrisy here?
photo
turkeylurky
Just keepin it real........
03:18 PM on 08/17/2011
Yah, Hitler's book "Mein Kampf" promoting the persecution of Jews would be considered criminal by the current Conservative Gov't in England. That's anti-free speech.
Where will this all end?
photo
AlanDente
Noses: made to hold glasses
03:37 PM on 08/17/2011
You can get a copy of Mein Kampf in the UK though, can't you?

Suppression of ideas thought pernicious will only result in those ideas suppressing us. This is why the EDL should be allowed their silly little marches in Bradford and so on.
01:16 PM on 08/17/2011
What's going on behind 'closed doors'?

Consistency in sentencing is extremely important not only to the offender, but also to those directly affected by the crime and to the public, since a perception of inconsistency in sentencing is likely to lead to a loss of public confidence in the criminal justice system and the home office. Therefore, can anyone explain this:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/facebook/8706485/England-riots-teenager-freed-after-encouraging-vandalism-on-Facebook.html

It looks as though the justice system will soon be clogged up with various (justifiable) appeals. Can't the establishment get anything right in this country?
01:05 PM on 08/17/2011
They won't do four years anyway - probably just two.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:51 PM on 08/17/2011
There is a massive problem with these old judges being completely out of touch with technology and therefore unable to appropriately understand what is going on. One of the most important skills lawyers and judges need is to be able to understand people and the context and the situations they are examining. Unfortunately too many judges don't have a grasp of technology and therefore can't pass a balanced judgement. I think this case is an example of that. 4 years is a ridiculous punishment for encouraging friends on Facebook to riot.

This article has an amusing example of a judge trying to grasp text messages:

http://news.techeye.net/mobile/us-supreme-court-judges-show-ignorance-of-technology

and another:
http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20110701/12225114934/judge-who-doesnt-understand-technology-says-wifi-is-not-radio-communication.shtml
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PMJ79
01:58 PM on 08/17/2011
Two young guys incited a riot-- what's to understand?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Christopher Hull
Democratic Socialist
05:04 PM on 08/17/2011
Tried to instigate. The riots they were calling for didn't happen. Is that a reason for them to go to jail?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:49 PM on 08/17/2011
Two young guys incited.... nothing.... nobody showed up... this is very heavy handed. I'm sure it wont tax anyone's imagination to think up something more constructive and appropriate than a jail sentence. Who benefits from these lads doing time? If indeed they need to be punished, then let it make some sense. Let their communities benefit. Ways to acheive that are already in use.
Where's the problem?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nete peedham
12:42 PM on 08/17/2011
This is nuts!
12:25 PM on 08/17/2011
When David Cameron was publically questioned on the reasons why he employed tabloid editor Andy Coulson of the News of the World as his PR Man, he offered his opinion that 'everyone deserves a second chance' - the same excuse used for the bailed out bankers I suppose. But, after the London 'Happening', Cameron wants to have those who got caught up in the moment of madness punished to within an inch of their lives. One 18 year old, who stole £3.50 of bottled water, has been sentenced to 6 months in prison, the two boys above both receiving four years. Is this 'excessive punishment' the sign of a frightened government - the Great Train Robbers each received 30 years in prison to counter the coinciding Profumo scandal. Cameron's government ministers today, as with MacMillan's government then, are trying to smokescreen themselves from a scandal which exemplifies the moral decay of the British establishment by offering up in its place the moral decay of the lower echelons of society. History is therefore repeating itself in regard to the rioters punishment coinciding with the continuing phone hacking scandal. However, this punitive behaviour is being applauded by most of the middle classes with the lower classes being seen as easy pickings to give the appearance of strong government. So now we have in play the classical 'Divide and Rule' strategy straight out of the Eton/Oxford sociopolitical debating class where few if any other than the ruling aristocracy are admitted.
05:15 PM on 08/17/2011
If I've understood what you're saying (its been a LOOONG day), this is what I've been trying to get across. Russell Brand (I know, I know) came out a few days ago with the same sort of thought process; ostracising the ostracised only serves to further alienate those who felt (stupidly) compelled to loot. I think we should take a "no tolerance" stance on the violence, but a six month sentence for a bottle of water or pair of shorts? Four years for typing something on the internet? It feels like madness.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
floodberg
Attorney (ret.)
05:35 PM on 08/17/2011
Well, I faved this Billbags (no badges for me on this thread, d*mn); this is a great post!  (I'm glad you told me, I went looking for it on the other and figured it had been raptured.)
12:16 PM on 08/17/2011
If one of your actions fails to be sucsesful you shouldnt be charged. People in this country are always charged with attempted crimes and rightfully so. There are no absolute rights even the freedom of speech has to be curbed when people want violence. You cant call for people to break the law with no punishment. If someone calls for people to kill a public official on facebook is that OK? People should use common sense and if your actions and yes even your statements put others in danger thats a problem. I guess I understand most liberals dont see the problem before they get hurt by the results.
12:54 PM on 08/17/2011
I don't think most people were saying there should be "no" punishment but rather that the sentences meted out are excessive and disproportionate. And I guess you "don't" understand most "liberals" at all. Plenty liberals have served their country with pride. This is a typical slight by a hard right that has forgotten compassion and humanity. The very things that lead to uprisings.
01:00 PM on 08/17/2011
So if I would post here that people should start rioting in Amsterdam. This would justify a four year prison term ? More then for most cases of robbery, breaking and entering , and assault cases.
photo
turkeylurky
Just keepin it real........
03:11 PM on 08/17/2011
You might not want to test that hypothesis..