Internet Could Run Ten Times Faster With Graphene

Huffington Post UK   First Posted: 30/08/11 18:55 Updated: 30/10/11 10:12

Internet Graphene Faster

Internet connections could run ten times faster than current speeds, according to research published in the journal Nature Communication.

University of Manchester and Cambridge scientists have discovered a key step in improving characteristics of graphene for use as photodetectors in high-speed optical communications. Graphene is a form of carbon just one atom thick and yet 100 times stronger than steel.

The UK team, including 2010 Nobel Prize-winning scientists Andre Geim and Kostya Novoselov, found that there was a 20-fold enhancement in the amount of light the graphene could harvest and convert into electrical power by combining graphene with metallic nanostructures.

Earlier this year, researchers from the University of California at Berkeley discovered the new use for graphene. They suggested that a one-atom-thick layer of crystallised carbon could be used as a possible replacement for traditional transistors in the next generation of computer chips.

Engineering professor Ziang Zhang said: "Graphene enables us to make modulators that are incredibly compact and that potentially perform at speeds up to ten times faster than current technology allows. This new technology will significantly enhance our capabilities in ultrafast optical communication and computing."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK

Internet connections could run ten times faster than current speeds, according to research published in the journal Nature Communication. University of Manchester and Cambridge scientists have dis...
Internet connections could run ten times faster than current speeds, according to research published in the journal Nature Communication. University of Manchester and Cambridge scientists have dis...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 140
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
photo
laterthanyouthink
My snark font is: ON
10:08 on 02/09/2011
Why actually do research and develop new technology when you can make trillions playing roullette at Casino Wall Street with unlimited backing from Uncle Fed?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/11/24/bailout-cost-government-p_n_145971.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
American Boer
07:29 on 02/09/2011
Just what we need, Huffington Post communist propaganda delivered at 10x the current speed.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
JessWonderin
22:07 on 01/09/2011
We won't see the domestic speed increase tenfold until AT
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mark Montgomery
The forces of fear do not scare me
20:52 on 01/09/2011
Where does one get graphene? Is it under a large tree that is used as a home by an indigenous population?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Andrew Harvey
Don't F with the Jesus
03:47 on 01/09/2011
Wow, if the internet speeds up by a factor of ten, you could actually download a real live prostitute, instead of just the video.
20:13 on 31/08/2011
Wait a minute, this sounds like science. We don't believe in science in amerika.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
brettjay
16:13 on 01/09/2011
In my reality nobody is smarter than me and nobody can convince me otherwise.
19:23 on 31/08/2011
I would totally hit that.
photo
WillofthePeople
Do YOU consent to toxic govt? Change ur thinking!!
19:09 on 31/08/2011
This needs to be brought to the market YESTERDAY, especially for solar power generation.
19:05 on 31/08/2011
No private company will invest in the infrastructure upgrade, so it won;t happen in the US. We'll still be happy if we can get 8.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
taqo
because we must?
18:58 on 31/08/2011
wow. it's, like, years that i've been talking about graphene until i'm foaming at the mouth and then someone writes an article and gets famous.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cheshiremoe
MyDogIsSmarterThanYourHonorRollStudent
18:48 on 31/08/2011
potential bandwidth of the technology has not been the limiting factor in the US for a long time. It comes down to cost/performance, for most of the country population density is not high enough to justify the expense of deploying fiber to the farm. Japan on the other hand has very high population density and so they have much higher average bandwidth per person. The technologies to transfer 20,000 cable channels worth of data over fiber has been around for nearly 10 years. US cable/phone companies have no incentive to increase bandwidth when they have no real competition, have large profits and shareholders pressure them to keep expenses low.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jcwtts1
Elections have consequences
19:34 on 31/08/2011
Which is why you need government intervention and investment. Of course most of those states without population are red states and they purport to believe in less gov. Until they need it. But with the division in the country there is no appetite to do selfless larger projects.

J
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cheshiremoe
MyDogIsSmarterThanYourHonorRollStudent
20:05 on 31/08/2011
Here in NC it is very we have smaller rural town that wants to put in its own broadband after TimeWarner declined to do it. Now the cable company is taking the city to court to stop it.

In my opinion cable and phone lines in public property should be owned by the government like roads. Then the lines would be leased to the service providers and the providers would be obligated to be fair/competitive.

The truth is that the free-market that conservatives keep saying is stifled by regulation will never exist with out it. Some of these "markets" never were and never will be free. They just don't function that way... they are monopolies by nature. To avoid having the public be taken advantage of they need to be government run or highly regulated. I would not work to have three different companies run cable to every house, three different phone lines, three water lines, three power lines, three sewage lines.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Wayne Caswell
Consumer Advocate & Founder of Modern Health Talk
19:43 on 31/08/2011
Yes. In Japan you can get 1 gigabits per second in both directions for $40/month. Our National Broadband Plan is only seeking 100Mbps in 10 years. We don't need new fiber technologies as much as we need real competition, sine today's FTTH networks could deliver gigabit speeds to each household. Why aren't carriers doing that? They don't need to, and it would be opening themselves to competition they're not ready for. They'd rather you watch their own content than stream someone else's. This won't change until they're forced to separate the services from the network and the networks are opened to competition. Search for "LIGHTning Strikes Cause Bandwidth Glut."It was written for IBM Microelectronics in 1999.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cheshiremoe
MyDogIsSmarterThanYourHonorRollStudent
20:09 on 31/08/2011
yup. These services are monopolistic by nature... you need them well regulated to for them to be good services.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MISTERUNCONVENTIONAL
The only attitude I've ever had is a bad one.
18:36 on 31/08/2011
And then Huffpo will just add 10X more "junk" to every page for a net speed-up of zero.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AbuHamza
18:22 on 31/08/2011
Graphene is a gorgeous molecule!

http://swarmknowledge.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/graphene_sheet.jpg
19:26 on 31/08/2011
Just absolutely beautiful, if it were a woman, I'd marry it...
photo
Sing Out and Slap Iron
What's that smell?
22:21 on 31/08/2011
Meh! Looks Photoshopped to me! ;)
18:16 on 31/08/2011
"Internet connections could run ten times faster than current speeds"
AND
Be ten times cheaper.
photo
NewmanKitten
Interlinear explainer of obtuse musings
18:11 on 31/08/2011
Those damned liberals at Berkeley...as my mother would say:)