Banks Enjoyed '£46bn Taxpayer Subsidy' In 2010

Banks

The Huffington Post UK   First Posted: 08/09/11 07:38 BST Updated: 07/11/11 10:12 GMT

British banks are unfairly profiting from a taxpayer funded subsidy and should be cut down to size, according to a report published on Thursday.

The study by the New Economics Foundation (NEF) calculates that the 'Big Five' British banks which are seen as 'too-big-to-fail' enjoyed a collective subsidy of £46 billion in 2010.

Lloyds, RBS, HSBC and Nationwide are said to have received £15 billion, £13billion, £7 billion and £1 billion respectively.

Barclays, which was not directly bailed out by the government at the height of the 2008 financial crisis, is said to have received an "indirect" subsidy of £10 million.

The NEF said that the figures were based on the difference between the low interest rates banks now pay to borrow money and what they would have to pay if the market did not believe the government would bail them out if they got into trouble again.

The report said that the banking industry has unfair advantages that allow it to make more profits in good economic times and that protect it from its own mistakes during the bad.

Tony Greenham, head of banking and finance at NEF said: “Banks are still in the casino with our cash and the tables are fixed in their favour. The quid pro quo for the banks’ unique position, and the unique privileges they enjoy, is fair, strong and effective regulation and a fair financial contribution to the British public."

"The longer government dodges reform, the longer the British public and the British economy will continue to pay for the banks’ failure. The time for hesitation is over.”

"Joining Germany and France in calling for the introduction of the Robin Hood Tax on financial transactions would be a good place to start," he said in a blog In a blog for the Huffington Post UK on Thursday.

The report argues that the amount of money received in subsidy far outweighs the amount the Treasury gets back in taxes from the banks.

It estimates the banking industry contributed £15.4 billion in taxes in the year to April 2010, compared to the £46 billion subsidy.

"If the government is to avoid subsidising the profits and pay of major banks and their staff, and achieve a fair deal for taxpayers, it needs to claw back the subsidies the banking industry enjoys by ensuring it pays its fair share of tax," the report concludes.

On Monday the Independent Commission on Banking (ICB) is set to outline its recommendations for the reform of the British banking sector.

The commission is expected to recommend the ring-fencing of high street retail banking from investment banking.

But the NEF said that would not go far enough. The report suggests the government should place a cap on the size of banks to prevent them from becoming 'too-big-to-fail' to begin with.

"Banks have been given an inappropriate level of freedom, and have been allowed to profit at the expense of taxpayers and customers alike. It is time to bring an end to the bankers’ private welfare state," the NEF said.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK

British banks are unfairly profiting from a taxpayer funded subsidy and should be cut down to size, according to a report published on Thursday. The study by the New Economics Foundation (NEF) calc...
British banks are unfairly profiting from a taxpayer funded subsidy and should be cut down to size, according to a report published on Thursday. The study by the New Economics Foundation (NEF) calc...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 16
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
02:42 PM on 09/10/2011
Bank robbery.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ithaqua
12:55 PM on 09/10/2011
So we pay the banks so that we can then borrow money from then and pay ineterest on it.

Bankers should at least have the decency to wear masks as they hold us up
05:00 AM on 09/10/2011
Same story, different country...are we all starting to connect the dots yet? We are being manipulated coming and going and it's being done right in front of our noses. It's time it stopped before it''s too late for those of us carrying all of the burden.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ithaqua
04:46 PM on 09/10/2011
f + f.

The robber barons of the 19th century have nothing on this criminal class running the banking industry
07:53 PM on 09/10/2011
Sadly, very sadly, I must agree. What do we do?
photo
European1919
I am the PigmⒶn
05:53 AM on 09/09/2011
Now make them pay the public back. They're bankers, they know that you always have to pay back what you owe - with a pound of flesh if necessary.
01:31 PM on 09/08/2011
I hate bankers. Just thought I would share that with the world.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ithaqua
12:50 PM on 09/10/2011
Yoy are not alone
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tim Haselden
An Enemy of Rupert Murdoch, since 1984.
12:03 PM on 09/08/2011
A comedian friend had a "corporate gig" a few months ago, It was for a certain bank that received billions of tax payer money. A financial year end celebration, for their bonuses etc.
Looking down at them, he thought "You greedy, selfish, morally repugnant gits." He noticed vast amounts of food on the tables and snapped. "Eat up, eat up , I'm paying for this !" He was greeted with embarassed silence.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ithaqua
04:48 PM on 09/10/2011
I wish I could fan you again. Instead I'll tag the post LOL cause if I'd been there I'd have been rolling in the aisles at your mate and their reaction to getting fingered on their nonsense
11:34 AM on 09/08/2011
That's about £1000 per person, or £1500 per worker.
Unfortunately, like most welfare recipients, the banks regard this as their right rather than something they should be grateful for.
10:06 AM on 09/08/2011
This is simply a disgrace, they should be penalized, not rewarded for incompetence, too big to fail is a joke while small business go to the wall in droves, the ulterior motives behind this is to have massive corporations rule over us all, globalization and world economics are destroying ordinary citizens lives throughout the western world it needs to be stopped, completely.
09:58 AM on 09/08/2011
Huff you need to sort your typo headline out billions or millions?. Taxpayers haven't bailed out the banks willingly, it's more like a hostage ransom situation. The state underwriting the banks at the same time as failing to impose regulation has created an imbalance or one way street in our economy. As the wider economy is squeezed by the Coalition's swingeing public sector cuts, banks are consolidating and holding on to funds in effort to make their profit margins look more attractive for investors. This causes liquidity problems for everyone but the banks, who act as if nothing has ever happened in the investment arms of their businesses and they continue to manipulate equity markets to make quick profits out of the subsequent volatility and its knock on effect of over -inflating commodity markets. The bank mafia's bubble is sure to burst again as their activities are not sustainable.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ithaqua
04:48 PM on 09/10/2011
f + f
09:53 AM on 09/08/2011
Huffington post - please read your headlines before your publish them. As you say in your 3rd paragraph, it is not "Banks Enjoyed '£46m Taxpayer Subsidy' In 2010" but '£46bn Taxpayer Subsidy'! This is a HUGE difference! These are the types of mistakes that prevent online news from being taken as seriously as print. Stop being so damn sloppy!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:10 PM on 09/08/2011
You were never a reader of the Grauniad back in the day? It was laugh a minute stuff....

On the serious side of it though... you're right.. proofreading is a skill and would have to be paid for, but.. if you want to be taken seriously, sometimes you have to spend a little to make your product "fit for purpose." There really is no excuse for sloppiness.