HS2 - Tory MP Accuses Councils Of 'Illegally' Spending £1m Of Taxpayers Money To Fight High Speed Rail

High Speed Rail

The Huffington Post UK   First Posted: 09/09/11 12:41 Updated: 08/11/11 10:12

A Conservative MP has accused Tory-run local authorities of potentially breaking the law by spending £1 million of taxpayers money opposing High Speed Rail.

Graham Evans has written to the Audit Commission to demand they investigate allegations that nine southern English authorities have spent a total of £1,175,000 on fighting the plan to connect London with Birmingham, Manchester and Leeds via new rail link.

The Weaver Vale MP has argued that High Speed Rail is necessary to create jobs in his constituency and tackle the North-South divide. He has accused southern councils run by members of his own party of "paying to keep the North poorer".

He said: "Local authorities should not use public funds to mount publicity campaigns whose primary purpose is to persuade the public to hold a particular view on a question of policy."

“This is a disgraceful misuse of public money. Councils know the rules and have wilfully broken them to suit their own political ambitions."

Evans said the practice broke strict rules governing the use of taxpayers money for lobbying and publicity and was therefore "potentially illegal".

The Code of Recommended Practice on Local Council Publicity states: "Local authorities, like other public authorities, should not use public funds to mount publicity campaigns whose primary purpose is to persuade the public to hold a particular view on a question of policy."

Evans identifies the culprits as:

According to Evans the councils are contributing the money to a ‘fighting fund’ run by 51m3, the anti high-speed rail lobbying group set up by seventeen local authorities set up to scupper High Speed Rail.

He said the money was the the equivalent to the council tax paid by 1,000 households.

The Department for Transport estimates High Speed Rail will cost £32 billion to construct, and generate benefits of around £44 billion, with revenues totaling a further £27 billion.

Opponents of the scheme include many Tory MPs who are wary of a noisy new train line slicing through their constituencies. Cheryl Gillan, the Welsh secretary and Buckinghamshire MP, publicly opposed the scheme despite being a member of the cabinet.

Evans has previously attacked opponents of the scheme as being an "alliance of luddites and nimbys".

Ironically the Audit Commision, which is being scrapped by the coalition, has itself been attacked for spending public money in a similar way as the councils are alleged to have.

Before the general election the public spending watchdog ,to which Evans has complained, was accused by the Conservatives of hiring a public affairs firm to lobby government.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK POLITICS

A Conservative MP has accused Tory-run local authorities of potentially breaking the law by spending £1 million of taxpayers money opposing High Speed Rail. Graham Evans has written to the Audit C...
A Conservative MP has accused Tory-run local authorities of potentially breaking the law by spending £1 million of taxpayers money opposing High Speed Rail. Graham Evans has written to the Audit C...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 11
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
Totto
Not "noises", One-Round, *music*!
21:48 on 11/09/2011
I love high-speed rail, but not in Britain, where it would dominate the surrounding countryside with noise and the necessary infrastucture. Aren't trains travelling at 110mph sufficient in a country with such limited and beautiful open space?
22:35 on 09/09/2011
It sure would be nice if certan people here could use international English instead of British English so the rest of us can understand the details.

Brum = ?
Luddite = ?
nimby = ?
centro = ?
photo
crydespite
oh go on then
03:29 on 10/09/2011
Brum - Birmingham (UK)
Luddite - 19th century follower of Ned Ludd (went around breaking up machinery in order to save manual jobs)
nimby - isn't this a US english one? Not In My Back Yard
centro - sorry, no idea...
photo
crydespite
oh go on then
03:32 on 10/09/2011
and i stand corrected by wikipedia. nimby was a british invention.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
floodberg
Attorney (ret.)
20:33 on 09/09/2011
My objection to UK rail is simple:  Economics.

Under EU rules, UK will have to move to a 'user pays' system where ticket prices are based on 'repaying' costs of building and operating the system.  In an effort to 'seamlessly tie together' EU rail, this means that the UK government would have limited financing options, and the users would bear the full ticket costs: this would price most users out of range. The EU paper on this is available at  http://ec.europa.eu/transport/strategies/doc/2011_white_paper/white_paper_com%282011%29_144_en.pdf

Basically, that pricing would price it out of the range of the working class, so this becomes a lovely 'rich persons' gift.  Not to mention that the current path avoids wealthy area and impacts 'lower class' areas with noise, traffic, etc. which will drop those property values even more.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Wesley Holbrook
Retired-Marine
19:42 on 09/09/2011
Would not the high speed rail cut down the amount of pollution and the areas of congested traffic? I believe America is in great need of it, however the U.S. automakers' would fight it all the way to the Supreme Court, if they could.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jack Glastra
My best comments are still pending.
08:50 on 10/09/2011
We don't build stuff like that anymore. Infrastructure is for commies!
photo
Totto
Not "noises", One-Round, *music*!
21:50 on 11/09/2011
Spoken like a REAL American! ;^ )
photo
Sickofpoliticians2
here to pissuoff
19:25 on 09/09/2011
I'm so glad the Tories have recognized there is a northern part of the country even though their patron saint decided to remove all industry north of brum during the eighties, alas it'll be too late for me to reap the benefits, even if I didn't have to use two weeks benefits for a saver return to the capital of greed and selfishness, but don't bestow any pity on my predicament, I've been before so I know the cost of said ticket is really not worth the trip.
This comment has been removed.
13:20 on 09/09/2011
Will the audit commission be investigating Birmingham Council and Centro who have been spending taxpayers' money promoting HS2?