Ed Miliband 'Would Cap' Student Tuition Fees At £6000

University

First Posted: 25/09/2011 03:57 Updated: 24/11/2011 09:12   PA

Student tuition fees would be capped at £6,000 under Labour plans unveiled by Ed Miliband in a crowd-pleasing eve of party conference announcement

The Opposition leader said the £1 billion move to cut the maximum charge by £3,000 would be funded through a levy on high-earning graduates and a tax hit on bankers.

As well as pleasing activists, the move will heap pressure on the governing parties, especially the Liberal Democrats whose U-turn on opposing fees sparked student riots.

However the move has not been welcomed with open arms by students. Liam Burns, who is the president of the National Union of Students, said that it was unlikely his members would see Labour as a true alternative:

Burns told Sky News: "When we managed to elect a parliament where the majority of MPs said we promise not to increase tuition fees at all, this is hardly the stuff that students are going to get excited about."

Mr Miliband said he wanted to use the annual gathering, being held in Liverpool, to show hard-working families "that Labour is back as the party of them".

As well as the fees reduction, he will use his set-piece speech on Tuesday to offer radical measures to end "rip off" household energy bills and over-expensive train fares.

In interviews with two Sunday newspapers, Mr Miliband said graduates earning more than £65,000 a year would pay higher interest on their student loans to help fund the lower cap. The rest would be found by cancelling, for the financial sector, the Government's cut in corporation tax.

"Parents up and down the country are incredibly worried about their sons and daughters," Mr Miliband told The Sunday Mirror. "We want to take action to make it easier for people to go to university and not feel burdened down by debt."

Ditching the Government's proposed cut in corporation tax from 28% to 23% was "fair" because "we shouldn't be cutting taxes for the banks at the moment", he said.

Coalition sources said the corporation tax cut for banks was already offset by the bank levy and suggested better-off graduates would find ways to get around the higher rates.

Universities Minister David Willetts said it represented a cynical U-turn, saying: "Ed Miliband promised a graduate tax and now he's accepting fees have to increase to finance universities in tough times. So why should students trust anything he says? He says one thing to become leader and within a year does a U-turn."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK UNIVERSITIES & EDUCATION

Student tuition fees would be capped at £6,000 under Labour plans unveiled by Ed Miliband in a crowd-pleasing eve of party conference announcement The Opposition leader said the £1 billion move t...
Student tuition fees would be capped at £6,000 under Labour plans unveiled by Ed Miliband in a crowd-pleasing eve of party conference announcement The Opposition leader said the £1 billion move t...
Filed by PA  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 14
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
05:00 PM on 09/25/2011
The conservatives must be laughing out loud at this rather weak spineless policy. Its a feeble reduction and no where near the rates that Scottish or Welsh students will pay. Im sorry Ed but if you want the student vote your going to have to do better than that!
photo
Mike Beckett
LibDem Cllr & Director of Caring for Business Ltd
03:53 PM on 09/25/2011
Changing their position on Student Loans and "...ditching the Government's proposed cut in corporation tax from 28% to 23% was 'fair' because 'we shouldn't be cutting taxes for the banks at the moment'...", but this affects small and medium businesses (where growth is most likely to come from) not only banks. Labours track record of being a majority government and having promised as a party before two separate elections. Firstly not to introduce tuition fees, which they did and then later not to increase them, they tripled them.

I just don't see a coherent narrative I can believe in from Labour. Lib Dems at least made the system less regressive and reduced the burden on graduates that was proposed and the issue split the Lib Dems three ways. Official Lib Dem policy remains to abolish Tuition fees and maybe next parliament we can achieve this.

The Lib Dems have an excuse Labour never had, they were a minority partner in government and had to reach a compromise in the national interest to form the government. When Labour had a majority government they were not forced to compromise, they chose to.
08:43 PM on 09/25/2011
How to promote two-faced pragmatism into the appearance of principle in three paragraphs.
09:18 PM on 09/27/2011
I understand the need for compromise. But that is NO excuse for your party's flagrant betrayal of young party. Stop defending your party leadership and Parliamentary colleagues for an inexcusable betrayal of trust.

I'll give the Conservatives props on the tuition fees issue for one thing; unlike the other two parties, they've at least stabbed us in the front.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
John michael Adams
12:52 PM on 09/25/2011
Where is Labour going to get the money to fund the tuition cap? Another tax hike? nevermind
this same old free healthcare, free tuition, free housing, free free free... just makes a country of slackers. it is bout time if people want education, they need to pay for it. If they cannot afford it, apply for scholarship. It is about time quality of student should be in the criteria in giving tuition benefits.
This will be another debt that everyone, especially private students, will bear just to pay for nannystate clients. The government cannot sustain paying for everything anymore. The nannystate experiment has reached its peak. Labour should just focus on job creation, besides that what "labor" is about - employment and job creation - and not welfare handout system.
photo
BeeJayCeee
I still loathe Thatcher
07:55 PM on 09/25/2011
People helping people, how dare they! And how dare people expect something back for their taxes?! That's *not* what taxes are for! Taxes are there to lift the heavy burden of social responsibility from rich corporations and to make sure rich people get even richer. How dare poor people, how *DARE* they, have the temerity, the nads, the chutzpah, the brass neck to expect something in return for having their pockets-picked every month and every time they visit the supermarket? String 'em up, it's the only language they understand. Oh, wait, then rich people would actually have to start paying their fair share.
12:22 PM on 09/25/2011
You would of thought that Labour might of learned from the stupid mistake made by the LibDems about making promises you can't keep. Obviously they want a headline but this is rediculous. Where is the logic in capping it at £6k. What's so special about that figure and why is that an exceptable amount that should be paid. For that matter why is £9K unacceptable.

I'm no Tory and would love to vota Labour again one day, but how the performance of the party 'in opposition' so far has been as worrying as it has been woeful.
10:52 AM on 09/25/2011
The Opposition leader said the £1 billion move to cut the maximum charge by £3,000 would be funded through a levy on high-earning graduates and a tax hit on bankers.
-------------------------------------------------
I need a think tank expert to tell me how this levy is collected from globally mobile high earners. If they spend three years in Hong Kong, are they levied on those earnings? If they are not levied on foreign earnings does this mean those who do not work abroad are penalised?
This comment has been removed.
10:26 AM on 09/25/2011
Well this a commitment which will come back and bight 'Ed' on the bum.
So the level is set at £6k - I assume that is based upon today's costs now be realistic - when do you think Labour will be in a position to deliver on this commitment - not anytime soon. So allowing for inflation, and all other rising costs, etc. Will £6k be enough or will finding the money to honour this target mean that there other public services will go short.
I think Ed is making this commitment in the safe and certain knowledge that he will not have to deliver against it for a long time yet, or even ever.
12:14 PM on 09/25/2011
Great point!
08:59 AM on 09/25/2011
In that case why not return to free education if it only costs 3 billion per year, they could still recoup some of the costs by means testing of parents, say anyone with over 50 grand income can stump up for fees, but reduce the fees to a normal level, say £1500, the present debacle of £9000 is simply ridiculous and exclusive regardless of how many times both universities and ministers say otherwise, no kid whose parents are min wage earners would sign up for these fees.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lawyer13
retired Lawyer, General and Psychiatric Nurse, wit
07:14 AM on 09/25/2011
Well who would have thought it, trying to get the young vote Ed
07:08 AM on 09/25/2011
Free Music Here

http://barrycudor.bandcamp.com/album/barryland-ep