Exam Board To Favour A-Level Students From Poorer Backgrounds

Private School Pupils Penalised

First Posted: 27/09/11 00:23 BST Updated: 28/09/11 14:22 BST   PA

A-level students who attend poorly-performing schools should be given extra credit by universities, a report said.

The paper for one of the country's biggest exam boards is being handed out at party conferences to encourage politicians to discuss ways to get pupils who show academic potential at weaker schools to continue with higher education.

Dr Neil Stringer from the Assessment and Qualifications Alliance (AQA), the author of the report, said research suggested students from "more favourable circumstances" were matched academically by their less privileged counterparts at university.

The senior research associate at the exam board's Centre for Education Research and Policy used the example of a medical school at the University of London that offers lower A-level grades to pupils from poorer schools.

St George's offers results of BBC rather than AAB to students who perform 60% better than the average for their school.

Dr Stringer said: "St George's reports that students from poorly-performing schools who are accepted into medical school with lower grades do just as well as their peers with higher grades.

"This strongly suggests that students admitted through the adjusted-criteria scheme learned enough at A-level and are able-enough learners to compete successfully with students who achieved higher A-level grades under more favourable circumstances."

Schools minister Nick Gibb said: "Universities are in charge of deciding their own admissions policies.

"But this proposal risks confusing employers, teachers and pupils by giving different values to the same A-levels and would undermine the integrity of public exams."

"All pupils who work hard and achieve high standards deserve to have their qualifications recognised."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK UNIVERSITIES & EDUCATION

A-level students who attend poorly-performing schools should be given extra credit by universities, a report said. The paper for one of the country's biggest exam boards is being...
A-level students who attend poorly-performing schools should be given extra credit by universities, a report said. The paper for one of the country's biggest exam boards is being...
Filed by PA  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 11
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
03:37 AM on 09/28/2011
Yes, we must promote the inferior intellects. Too many smart folks can be oh-so pesky when attempting to establish a fascistic worker's paradise.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lawyer13
retired Lawyer, General and Psychiatric Nurse, wit
10:52 AM on 09/27/2011
I have never been in favour of positive discrimination, it is totally unfair, people should be judged on merit alone
10:03 AM on 09/27/2011
This is going to be a very tough balance for them to achieve. On one hand, I think most people would agree that there are better teachers and worse teachers, and it is fair to say that the more money a school can pay, the higher chance they have at having better teachers. Therefore two students of equal potential could achieve different grades based upon their teachers ability. However, the worry with this kind of idea, is that we need to avoid the positive discrimination of those who attend better schools and who have the better grades. In a way it is not a child's' fault his parents were wealthy and he was able to get better grades, we should not pass him over.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kevin Mcilroy
10:03 AM on 09/27/2011
It is all well and good giving these students an easier path into university - I can see that maybe the principle is that they have shown their potential by doing well in an otherwise poorly performing environment - but at what stage will we say enough is enough and they have to be judged against everyone? Will employers have to give candidates from 2nd rate universities preference over Oxford or Cambridge?

We seem to be sleepwalking into a society that can't accept that some people are better suited than others at some tasks and as a result we enforce mediocrity because we are afraid that we might be seen to be elitist and/or have to tell someone that they are not suited to their life choice.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:45 PM on 09/27/2011
The problem goes deeper. The notion that these students should be given an easier path to university would never even come up if ALL children, from ALL backgrounds had an equal chance right from the start. Which is how it should be. It has to begin in primary school. Not at university entrance level.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kevin Mcilroy
08:56 AM on 09/28/2011
Fair point but how do you ensure that all schools are equal?

If there are two schools in an area and the teaching in one is better than the other what are you going to do ? Surely you wouldn't ask the better school to lower the quality of its teaching? Can you force the weaker school to improve its standards?