EU Commission Proposes Tax On Financial Institutions, But UK Indicates It Will Veto

Huffington Post UK    
First Posted: 28/09/11 14:25 Updated: 28/09/11 16:31

The European Commission has formally proposed placing a financial transaction tax (FTT) on EU members.

The tax would levy 0.1 per cent of every financial transaction when at least one party is based in the EU. Derivative contracts would also be taxed, at 0.01 per cent.

The tax will "ensure that the financial sector makes a fair contribution at a time of fiscal consolidation in the member states", the European Commission said.

Financial firms are "under-taxed" compared to other sectors, it argues, and the "significant additional revenue" would be a boost to public finances.

The announcement was made as commission president Jose Manuel Barroso said that the EU faced its "greatest challenge" in his annual state of the union address to MEPs.

Speaking in Strasbourg, Barroso said: "In the last three years, member states have granted aid and provided guarantees of 4.6 trillion euros (£4 trillion) to the financial sector. It is time for the financial sector to make a contribution back to society."

He added that the commission would clamp down on tax avoidance.

"It is not only financial institutions who should pay a fair share. We cannot afford to turn a blind eye to tax evaders. So it is time to adopt our proposals on savings tax within the European Union. And I call on the member states to finally give the commission the mandate we have asked for to negotiate tax agreements for the whole European Union with third countries."

"Further changes to the Treaty of Lisbon" might be needed to implement measures to reforge the economy of Europe, Barroso said.

The new measure is expected to raise around £50 billion a year from 2014, but it has been opposed by some countries - including the UK.

Some officials in the City of London have said that 80 per cent of all the revenue from the tax would come from London.

Chancellor George Osborne has said that he would not agree to the new tax unless other countries outside the EU also imposed it.

"I am against an EU tax," Osborne said earlier this month. "There would be no point introducing a financial transaction tax that led, the next day, to our foreign exchange markets moving to New York or Singapore or anywhere else."

The Treasury told the BBC that "we would not do anything that is not in the UK's interests".

Professor Philip Booth, editorial director at the Institute of Economic Affairs, warned that the tax was "grossly unfair" as its impact "would be felt far harder in London than anywhere else in Europe”.

“A tax on transactions is ultimately a tax on banks' customers," said Booth. "It will make banks less efficient and banking services more expensive. Furthermore, a tax on bank transactions will lead investment business out of the EU and lead banks to develop more complex ways of hiding transactions.

"The volume of banking transactions neither caused the banking crisis nor the sovereign debt crisis. EU leaders need to be resolving the latter if we are to avoid another financial crisis worse than that of 2008."

However, the Trade Union Council welcomed the announcement of what it called the "Robin Hood Tax".

In a statement General Secretary Brendan Barber said:

“This is a major step forward and I urge the British government to support it. An FTT would provide much needed revenue for tackling climate change, global poverty and cutting public sector deficits.

“It would also help rebalance the economy, address the under-taxing of the financial sector, and reward long-term investment.”

The commission has said that if the UK vetoes that tax it will implement it in the eurozone.


Quick Poll

Would you support the UK joining an EU financial tax?

Yes

No

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK

The European Commission has formally proposed placing a financial transaction tax (FTT) on EU members. The tax would levy 0.1 per cent of every financial transaction when at least one party is base...
The European Commission has formally proposed placing a financial transaction tax (FTT) on EU members. The tax would levy 0.1 per cent of every financial transaction when at least one party is base...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 8
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
European1919
I am the PigmⒶn
12:11 on 29/09/2011
He's already said it all. Once again it is the man in the street who is being robbed by the banks supported by government. I am so utterly, utterly sick and tired of these bar stewards.

"“A tax on transactions is ultimately a tax on banks' customers," said Booth. "It will make banks less efficient and banking services more expensive. Furthermore, a tax on bank transactions will lead investment business out of the EU and lead banks to develop more complex ways of hiding transactions. "
photo
lunarsnare
♫♪♫ ♪♫♪
06:52 on 29/09/2011
Like Brussels (unelected bureaucrats) is not sucking enough money out of the member states already.
All these EU contribution fees come out of the regular taxpayer pocket, where this yet another tax will also passed on.
You can’t tax yourself out of poor money management without ruining the economies.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lawyer13
retired Lawyer, General and Psychiatric Nurse, wit
05:38 on 29/09/2011
The UK are quite right to use their veto to block this proposal, if we do not London would lose alot of Banking and Insurance business, as these firms would locate elsewhere where there is no such tax, e.g. Singapore or Honk Kong. Only if all the rest of the world adopt this tax would it be fair to us in the UK.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
John michael Adams
15:17 on 28/09/2011
this financial transaction tax will be disadvantageous for the UK
this trade union council wants this tax to what? fund climate change, global poverty and public sector benefits = the three socialist programs that do not create any jobs.
Unions are so outdated and out of touch with the challenges of the times.

Of course the UK government will veto this tax and if the eurozone implements this, it will drive financial firms in Frankfurt and Paris to transfer their headquarters to the UK, which is good for the economy. This is what the unions do not see. unions do not know anything about job creation. they killed more jobs than created one.
the UK will not join this tax as what Osborne said.
14:13 on 29/09/2011
Unfortunately I believe that this "dependence" on Nation States to be old fashioned and outdated. We live on one planet, we need to share this planet with each other, we've got to stop being so insular. A lot of our problems relate to cross-nation state issues and can only be solved by international co-operation and agreement. The EU is not perfect, it needs reform, just like our banking systems. Just like the way we "do business".
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
John michael Adams
18:55 on 30/09/2011
i still approve of the nation-state system. In fact, Germany is acting on German interests within the EU, France even deported Roma residents out of Paris, Italians are closing their borders, the Dutch already restated customs experts along the border. You cannot have an artificial union of people coming from nation-states and still fantasized that they will imagine a "european" community without protecting their nation's interests.
the nation-state is not outdated as long as there are significant differences among people, may it be their looks, their corporate culture, their fiscal habits, their language, their ideologies, their heritage, their own social problems in their own country.
Alot of problems are cross-national but most of the problem require local solutions, I cannot trust a centralized government to solve my community's problem. Devolution and not centralization, unless you dont want people to have a say on problem-solving - that is your EUSSR.
the EU is not perfect, it will never be perfect or exist at the best interest of all countries in it. I say abolish the EU because it is technocratic. Just like the way we "do business" by localizing solutions and not trusting a bunch of politicians in Brussels to dictate solutions for everyone.
13:54 on 28/09/2011
I believe a lot of people will support a tax like this, whether you call it a Tobin or Robin Hood Tax. The UK Government may find itself out of step with public opinion on this one if Osborne continues with his stance.
This comment has been removed.