Guardian's Alan Rusbridger: Twitter Is Wonderful But Without Reporters 'We Are All F****d'

Alan Rusbridger

The Huffington Post UK   First Posted: 30/09/11 10:07 BST Updated: 29/11/11 10:12 GMT

Guardian editor Alan Rusbridger has described Twitter as "wonderful" but said that without traditional news reporters "we are all f****d".

He was speaking at a special debate on phone hacking, which included Carl Bernstein, one of the journalists famed for breaking the Watergate story.

Rusbridger said: "I think Twitter is a wonderful medium, but in the end there are people represented in this audience tonight and they are called reporters, and reporters like these - once we lose reporters - we are all f****d.

"We need reporters who go out and do reporting. That is not the same as Twitter. That is endangered too because of the economics of newspapers and some people are not aware how great a danger that is. Let's hear it for reporters," he said.

The debate was organised by the Guardian to assess the damage to the press following the phone hacking scandal which it pursued.

The panel of experts, who were chaired by Channel 4 presenter Krishnan Guru-Murthy, took questions from the audience.

They included Pulitzer Prize winning Bernstein, George Eustice, former press secretary to David Cameron, Sylvie Kauffmann, editorial director of Le Monde and Alan Rusbridger, editor-in-chief of the Guardian.

When asked if the press needed to be more regulated Bernstein said: "The only tool at our command is good reporting and the use of shame.

"We have to stop this fiction about the press media not being part of the larger culture. Our institutions have lost the trust of the people. If there is a single thing going on in the world today from the Middle East to New York to Greece is a lost in trust in our institutions especially government and regulatory institutions.

"The press deserves a lot of that loss of trust. We have to ask ourselves why in this current culture people are seeking information not to be more illuminated, but rather seeking information to reinforce already held ideological and political beliefs. That is where our journalism is headed as well."

Kauffmann was quizzed about the French media's coverage of the Dominique Strauss-Kahn scandal and why it was not pursed as ruthlessly as phone hacking was by the Guardian.

"It exposed the weakness of the media in France," she admitted.

"Mostly because journalists thought it was off limits, they thought it was his private life. A lot of people, after it happened, said 'but this was his private life?'

"The limit between what is public and what is private is very delicate issue in France. I think this is going to change because of what happened."

Asked again about the state of journalism in a modern, social connected era Bernstein added: "One of the things journalists have done is to hold conferences to give us an idea of how self important we are. I think you are listening to a bunch of dinosaurs who are self-involved, all of us.

"This is the last slap of the dinosaur's tale."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK

Guardian editor Alan Rusbridger has described Twitter as "wonderful" but said that without traditional news reporters "we are all f****d". He was speaking at a special debate on phone hacking, whic...
Guardian editor Alan Rusbridger has described Twitter as "wonderful" but said that without traditional news reporters "we are all f****d". He was speaking at a special debate on phone hacking, whic...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 7
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Mike Lorrey
mild mannered virtual reality tycoon
05:18 AM on 10/01/2011
Oh dear without those all important reporters to filter the truth and decide what we need to be told and what we do not need to be told, how and what to think about what we are told, how are we to make sense of the world around us?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:56 PM on 09/30/2011
The title of this piece is pathetic. Everybody knows what F****d means, so your measly little asterisk fig leaves are utterly useless. If Alan Rusbridger said what we all know he said, for God's sake print it. He is a hugely respectable journalist and a man who knows exactly what he is doing when he uses the English language. Why can't your twee little censors respect that?

This miserable and totally ineffective policy may look like a lowly scribe's resentment of a greater power of expression than their own, but I actually think it's because of the AOL link and the fact that some poor, otherwise defenceless reader in the USA might be inadequately protected against the shameful, radioactive and mind-destroying, letters u, k, c and e.

It is common knowledge that no American could ever use such nasty, naughty words because most don't know them and - with the honourable exception of Lenny Bruce - the few that do aren't really sure what they mean.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lawyer13
retired Lawyer, General and Psychiatric Nurse, wit
09:02 PM on 09/30/2011
If it wasn't for the public and life they would realy be F****ed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Luvon
A witty Comment
08:53 PM on 09/30/2011
I don't like most corporate, giant media because I think they can be bought off my big interests and politicians.

They NEVER do their job, if they did, my Country would have never been led into Iraq on a lie. I think the statistics for the Iraq war was something like 80% believing Saddam had something to do with 9/11.

The media wants to report about Beyonce being pregnant before they want to report about how those Corporations have our political body paralyzed. They don't report how much money candidates take in from corporate interests wither, which is something I think is very important to report on, especially for the folks that are crafting our legislation.

Biased and unhonest reporting and corporate influenced news is why most folks are turning to the Daily Show for news. Corporate media is a fail, always has been and always will be. They don't give honest reporting, they tilt news in favor of their pet candidates, have a habit of being biased on some international issues, goading the American people towards conflict, and running favorable articles for the corporate interests that pay their bills. I also have zero respect for the way the make Israel a saint fighting demons, while demagoguing the Muslims and Palestinians.

F em. I hope they do go the way of the dinosaur.
lastpost
see biography
01:37 PM on 09/30/2011
"the state of journalism"
We have just witnessed an attempt to gain complete control of government, and presumably thereafter the people. Government will now attempt to use this as the justification to impose complete control over journalism. To prevent that equally unhealthy state of affairs from occurring, cooperative action though journalism could be used to promote a devolution of power to the people. Such that neither politicians, press, police, or any other group would ever again be in a position the seize total control. Because from some angle or another, such clandestine activity would be detected and exposed. By forming an arena, in which the debate could be conducted, journalism could encourage the creation of a system in which transparency is the norm not the exception. Unless of course, they are prepared to meekly embrace the consequences concomitant with the gifting of absolute power to one section of society.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bfry420
11:15 AM on 09/30/2011
If you respect writing. you will respect the money making process. you still have to go to school and be certified. slow down. it will be alright.
photo
GovtIsGreat
98% of respondents agree ~ tax the other 2% MORE !
10:15 AM on 09/30/2011
'' We are all F*****d '' in many instances where reporters are ''chasing'' and angle that their editors forced upon them in which their editors forced on them in which the owner forced on them. ''

- especially when the ''angle'' is chased by illegal means.