Worst Quarter For FTSE 100 Since 2002

Ftse 100

First Posted: 30/09/11 19:00 BST Updated: 30/09/11 19:05 BST

Fresh fears of a global recession have pushed London's leading shares index down more than 1%, capping off its worst quarter of trading for nine years.

The FTSE 100 Index fell 68.4 points to 5128.5 after worrying Chinese and US economic data added to fears about a Greek default.

The fall means London's blue chip shares have fallen 13.7% in the third quarter of 2011 - its worst performance since 2002 when the dot-com boom ended.

The UK's biggest companies have had some £212 billion wiped off their value in the past three months.

World markets have been hugely volatile in recent weeks as investors panicked that the US and eurozone would be unable to keep up with payments on their huge debts and would lead the world back into recession.

The latest falls were caused after a monthly survey by banking giant HSBC showed that China's manufacturing remained stagnant in September due to sluggish demand both at home and abroad.

Poor data from the US added to the gloom today after the Commerce Department said incomes fell for the first time in nearly two years in August.

This added to fears about the eurozone debt crisis, as Greek Prime Minister George Papandreou pressed European leaders, including French President Nicolas Sarkozy, to release the next eight billion euro (£7 billion) bailout instalment for his country.

Greece has warned it will default on its debt payments if it does not receive the money, which would create financial chaos.

PA

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK

Fresh fears of a global recession have pushed London's leading shares index down more than 1%, capping off its worst quarter of trading for nine years. The FTSE 100 Index fell 68.4 points to 512...
Fresh fears of a global recession have pushed London's leading shares index down more than 1%, capping off its worst quarter of trading for nine years. The FTSE 100 Index fell 68.4 points to 512...
Filed by Dina Rickman  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 18
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
12:03 AM on 10/01/2011
Nice to see good old Tory policies at work
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
catboycolo
I'll have the coffee, not the KoolAid
09:42 PM on 09/30/2011
These huge rises and falls in world markets appear capriciuos to me. There needs to be more control over kneejerk reactions to daily news.
08:46 PM on 09/30/2011
Westerners are so odd. When we're all losing money we condemn greed among "the rich", when we're all blowing our credit cards on rubbish we don't need...why then we just let it all hang out!

At 33, I have never HAD a credit card, I don't WANT a credit card, and I don't NEED a credit card. Britain has among the highest *personal debt* ratings (and that has nothing to do with Goldman Sachs or anyone else) in the developed world.

72% of 20-35 year olds recently said they don't ever expect to own a home. This is nonsense. By saving 10k a year on an average salary and being cautious with cash you can easily build up the deposit for a home just like your parents did. Instead, my generation wants every iPad, superphone, luxury bag and swanky pair of shoes under the sun. This 'have it now' mentality is dangerous and it is against basic adult reasoning.

This isn't the Great Depression of the 1930s, it's a recession. Anyone old enough to remember the 1980s knows this is not the end of the world, yet maybe it's time people in Britain cut up their credit cards and stopped buying things they can't pay for? I would love to have a new iPad...but I don't NEED one. Take my advice: spend good money on shoes and beds - if you're not in one, you're usually in the other.
http://todayfreedom.blogspot.com/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Luvon
A witty Comment
09:02 PM on 09/30/2011
An effective employment rate of 17% isn't as bad as the great depression's 25-30%, but it's almost just as bad.

If people made more money, and the wealth was distributed a little more evenly, people wouldn't be putting so much things on credit cards. People want to have nice television sets and luxuries, thus they put it on their credit card. And theirs nothing wrong with that in my opinion.

Most folks have gone bust due to the housing market collapse. People have a bigger debt on their house than the house is even worth. Why is this? Irresponsibility on Wall Street, driven by those freebie interests rates put in place by Greenspan. if I was in their position, I would declare bankruptcy as well. Why would I pay 100k for a house worth only 50k? I'll pass that debt right on to the bank, and I wouldn't have the slightest problem with doing so.

I think it's wrong to claim that the American people are at fault here for using credit cards. Most of it is driven by the housing market.
10:54 PM on 09/30/2011
Wealth distribution is a problem as ancient as prostitution, as you know. I'm not a rampant capitalist by any means; I'm a free market semi-socialist dissenter.

If you're unemployed then it's a done deal - you can't pay your mortgage. Yet if a person still has their job then they need to cut out ALL extra-curricular expenditure and stop acting as though life is a playground. Thatcherism destroyed the UK economy for a decade and many people lost their homes because of her irresponsible games and chat about there being "no such thing as society". The US has been living in a weird economic buzz since the 50s and it's left a colossal poverty gap as a result. I advocate higher taxes for all, especially the super rich. Just like we have in the UK. Sir Philip Green recently had his premises smashed up because he tried to keep his £500,000,000 profit in offshore accounts. That is immoral - the money belongs in the UK where he made it.

But personal debt IS a major contributing factor to the global downturn, it's not just about the property scandals. Add to that the tampering with the oil assets of sovereign Arabic nations and you have a recipe for disaster.

Everyone had to pull their way and put the credit card in the bin.
http://todayfreedom.blogspot.com/
10:01 AM on 10/01/2011
Regardless of whether you think it's the people who are to blame or not (this goes to both yourself and LondonDavid) it's the people who have to deal with it. Though, of course people "shouldn't" be so materialistic but with both the availability of overdrafts, credit cards, etcetera and the forever perfected techniques of advertisers and marketing it's no surprise that people want all this "stuff". It's sort of a chicken or the egg complex though, but it's whether it was demand or availability that fuelled it. However, a couple of hundred quid on an iPad is nothing in comparison to the billions that are being stored away by bankers and insurance companies etcetera who are no doubt slowing economic growth.
11:24 PM on 09/30/2011
It's not the buying of iPads that's the problem.

parents could save for a deposit because rent for a tiny flat wasn't the same as the interest only mortgage payment on that flat. landlords needed normally 30% plus deposit to enter the buy to let business. In the last 10 years people were entering the market getting the maximum loan they could and setting the rent to cover the interest on that loan. Expecting the property to increase in value. you know, like buy a dot com stock which doesn't pay a dividend but you expect to profit from by the increase in demand for that stock. Just like a bubble.

it's not the great depression of the 1930s, it's the greater depression. 1920s was fueled by credit bubble, and so were the 2000s the only difference is that the numbers in % terms are much larger.

this generation do have a 'have it now attitude' which is part of the problem, however the previous generation had the same attitude but had access to credit. when they had to keep the bubbles going, they simply increased the amount of credit by having ever lower interest rates.

while they don't expect to own a home, they are more than likely to. there's a massive property price crash coming. in real terms the middleclass are going to get wiped out. we can already see signs of this. shops like habitat are going under, while lowcost stores and highend stores are doing ok.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BUSFREAK
08:24 PM on 09/30/2011
Thank God we are in the summer of recovery, I mean the fall of recovery or somewhere in between.
08:22 PM on 09/30/2011
Not sure about this, 2008 was bad when the FTSE got down below 4,000 at some stage. In any case it would be wise to remember that most of the wordly wise speculators will be rubbing their hands with glee. This is when they make their money.

The have been desperate for the BBC, Guardian and now the Huff to hype it up. They need the stress!!!

Talk about hysterical chickens in the media
08:08 PM on 09/30/2011
good, hope the rich start chucking themselves out of 50th floor windows very soon, try to make sure you land on a politician when you do, and yes I understand the implications, guess what, I've sweet FA to lose now anyway.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lawyer13
retired Lawyer, General and Psychiatric Nurse, wit
07:48 PM on 09/30/2011
It's all down to making a fast buck, and above all greed
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
John michael Adams
06:41 PM on 09/30/2011
i think the french CAC is the worst performer.. not to mention numerous big french banks were downgraded already.
12:05 AM on 10/01/2011
Always a good bet to blame the French
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
John michael Adams
08:47 PM on 10/02/2011
well, it is true anyway. which banks lent the overspending greeks and now have the biggest exposure to greek debt? oh yea, French banks. lol
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
catboycolo
I'll have the coffee, not the KoolAid
05:45 AM on 10/01/2011
Is the CAC at a 9-year low?