EU Regulation Could Damage The City: CBI

Cridland

Huffington Post UK   First Posted: 13/10/11 23:20 BST Updated: 14/10/11 09:17 BST

The UK’s financial and professional services risked being damaged by "heavy handed" European regulation, the director general of the Confederation of British Industries (CBI) has warned.

Speaking at the organisation’s annual dinner on Thursday night John Cridland said proposals in Brussels for a financial transaction tax; the “solvency II” proposal for new capital requirements for the insurance industry; the capital requirements directive; and audit market and corporate governance reforms risk holding back the development of the sector.

“The likely effect of many of Brussels’ current proposals will be to damage the UK’s prospects for growth,” he said.

"Nowhere is this more acutely the case than for professional and financial services, which are being bombarded with unwarranted regulation."

Cridland focused on EU’s attempts to implement a “Tobin tax”, which would take skim off a small percentage from financial transactions, meaning that markets would be forced to directly contribute to the public purse.

The CBI director general said that such a tax would disproportionately affect the UK.

"The tax would be an incredibly blunt instrument, one that would increase the cost of capital for businesses, hold back their growth potential and raise minimal revenue in return," he said.

"And it’s a policy that will penalise the UK as Europe’s leading financial centre, diverting activity to financial hubs like New York, Singapore or Hong Kong. Believe me, there’s nothing its financiers would like to see more than London totalled by the Tobin tax."

He will also hit out at attempts to centralise policymaking on corporate governance in Brussels.

"Recent experience from the US and Sarbanes Oxley shows what happens with a law-based, prescriptive approach: you get minimal benefit but massive extra cost," he said.

"There’s a lack of understanding that set rules can’t work for every type of company, with dangers of reforms for financial institutions being imposed over listed companies, and talk of extending corporate governance rules to the unlisted sector.

"This appears to be yet another Brussels power grab, with EU-wide rules imposed when we know that national codes of governance are far more able to reflect different market places and shareholder bases."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK

The UK’s financial and professional services risked being damaged by "heavy handed" European regulation, the director general of the Confederation of British Industries (CBI) has warned. Speaking...
The UK’s financial and professional services risked being damaged by "heavy handed" European regulation, the director general of the Confederation of British Industries (CBI) has warned. Speaking...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 6
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
06:35 AM on 10/14/2011
From what we're told here on the other side of the pond is that the UK sort of has an ambivalence, or sometimes downright refusal, to help any efforts of the EU to stabilize itself? With the neighboring economies being so dependent on each other, we figured it could be in their best interest to aid with any measures decided by the collective. Great Britain has generally been known for it's euroskepticism and ambiguous membership opt-outs, perhaps this is why the regulations are to be expected?
photo
European1919
I am the PigmⒶn
05:59 AM on 10/14/2011
Let us hope it does. I am fed up with financially supporting banks, which are private enterprises subject to the entrepreneurial risks just like any oner private enterprise, with my taxes. If their business model is one which obviously does not work, let the market (forces), which they profess to so love, close them down. A sad it would be, but in future the public would choose to bank with banks which have a business model which does work and which does not require them to be kept artificially alive by the government misdirecting funds into private enterprise which being tax revenue should be spent on worthwhile public sector projects.
Alternatively de-privatise the banks. They would then work on a different business model and would only rarely, if ever, need bailing out - which then would be ok since they would be state-owned.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Lawyer13
retired Lawyer, General and Psychiatric Nurse, wit
03:58 AM on 10/14/2011
EU regulations have ruined this country as a whole. when are we going to have a referendum so the British people can give their view on EU
09:44 AM on 10/14/2011
Which regulations would that be? Can you be more specific?

And which regulations do you think the UK could drop if it left the EU?

Quote from Norwegian press: "1,774 of 1,777 EU directives have been adopted into Norwegian law, making Norway the second-most obedient country in Europe apart from Malta, according to latest figures from the EFTA Surveillance Authority (ESA). Italy comes bottom.

“This is not an exercise in sadomasochism. Most directives are uncontroversial and have a good purpose,” ESA President Per Sanderud tells Aftenposten."
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Caru
Politics is fun to watch.
12:15 AM on 10/14/2011
That's actually a good tax.
photo
BeeJayCeee
I still loathe Thatcher
10:32 PM on 10/13/2011
Time something was done to reign in the excesses of these mountebanks.