Sex Education In Schools Is Still A 'Postcode Lottery'

Sex Education In School

Huffington Post UK   First Posted: 17/10/11 18:31 BST Updated: 17/12/11 10:12 GMT

Everyone will have their own horror stories of embarrassed teachers trying to lecture unruly, awkward schoolchildren about sex - tales which most believe belong firmly in the past.

But how much has this actually changed?

Over the past month, the quality - and quantity - of sex education in schools has been thoroughly scrutinised by trusts, charities and parents alike.

According to a survey conducted by Brook, a sexual health charity, and published last Wednesday, more than a third of teenagers said they got most of their information about sex from friends. Some 26 per cent agreed sex and relationships education (SRE) was "non-existent" at their school.

Additionally, a previous report from the Daily Telegraph revealed pupils were being left in the dark by teachers who felt "uncomfortable" teaching "sensitive" topics.

Karen Norris is a mother of four from Surrey, whose two boys attend different boarding schools. One goes to a mixed, non-religious school in Berkshire, while the other attends a boys-only Catholic institution in Oxfordshire.

"The varying degrees of sex education they get is unbelievable. My older son, who attends the mixed school, gets given condoms and seems to know pretty much everything there is to know about sex. But my 14-year-old, who boards at the boys-only school, hasn't a clue. I appreciate parents play a large role in educating their children about sex, but schools really should take some responsibility. There doesn't seem to be any sort of consistency across the board - and the schools are only a county apart," she said

Rebecca Finlay, press and campaigns manager for sexual health charity Family Planning Association (FPA) told the Huffington Post UK the system was a "postcode lottery".

"It completely depends where a child goes to school as to how much sex education they get."

FPA recommend sex education starts at primary school, so children can learn the basics.

"At five to seven, teachers should be talking about love", Finlay added. "From seven onwards, they should learn about puberty. It is important they understand what is happening to their bodies before it actually happens. Some girls do start menstruating at eight - in general, children are entering puberty younger; it's a lot to do with diet and lifestyle.

"Between 13 and 15 they should ideally be learning about sex and relationships. Teachers should be talking to pupils about sexuality and peer pressure. Those conversations are really important."


What's your view on the sex education currently being given in schools? Share your thoughts below.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK UNIVERSITIES & EDUCATION

Everyone will have their own horror stories of embarrassed teachers trying to lecture unruly, awkward schoolchildren about sex - tales which most believe belong firmly in the past. But how much ha...
Everyone will have their own horror stories of embarrassed teachers trying to lecture unruly, awkward schoolchildren about sex - tales which most believe belong firmly in the past. But how much ha...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 6
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
10:48 AM on 10/18/2011
Brook and the FPA LIE! They're in this, colluding with the gvnmt purely for money! I'm (an extremely angry) parent who happened to discover what my 6 year old child was being "indoctrinated" with at school, explicit sexual material that some parents have described as pornographic. I have since withdrawn him from state education and now home school. I would advise any parent with an ounce of sense to do the same! Children are not being educated, they are being incited into early sexual curiosity and behaviour. They are given step by step instructions on how to have sexual intercourse and masturbation, with animated cartoons of people having sex in various positions whilst the narrator says how 'exciting' it is (just one example). Paedophiles use the technique to groom child victims, showing them sexually explicit material to desensitise them and trick them into thinking the behaviour is normal and acceptable... so you could say that children being herded into classrooms and forced to watch such material are being mass groomed, which is child abuse.
All members of the Education Department should be CRB checked because the amount of MP's and teachers who have been convicted of paedophilic activities is disturbing.
Any parent who thinks the responsibility of teaching their children such things lies with the state and not with themselves needs their head testing, why have children if you're just going to hand them over to the state on a plate to bring up for you!
photo
pepperoniprince
send in the clowns...don't bother, they're here
05:51 PM on 10/17/2011
"Karen Norris is a mother of four from Surrey, whose two boys attend different boarding schools. One goes to a mixed, non-religious school in Berkshire, while the other attends a boys-only Catholic institution in Oxfordshire."

Most interesting part here raises the question; why do you children got to such disparate schools?
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Lawyer13
retired Lawyer, General and Psychiatric Nurse, wit
06:11 PM on 10/17/2011
Perhaps you should have gone to a school which taught English, look at the last line of your post it does not make sence
photo
pepperoniprince
send in the clowns...don't bother, they're here
07:17 PM on 10/17/2011
Thanks for the update, princess.
09:30 PM on 10/17/2011
I'm as much of a grammar Nazi as anyone but, really, it's a little ridiculous to mock people for typos.