Julia Gillard, Australian Prime Minister, Defends 'Not Curtsying' To The Queen

The Queen

First Posted: 20/10/11 12:59 BST Updated: 20/12/11 10:12 GMT   PA

Australia's prime minister Julia Gillard insisted she did not break royal protocol by deciding not to curtsy to the Queen.

When the politician first greeted the monarch after her plane touched down in Canberra on Wednesday, she bowed her head and shook hands with the head of state. But Governor-General Ms Quentin Bryce, the Queen's official representative in Australia, curtsied.

Ms Gillard defended her decision during a number of interviews throughout the day, saying she received advice from protocol staff that the formality was optional.

She told reporters in Queanbeyan, New South Wales: "They are happy with what people are comfortable with."

The Welsh-born prime minister, who is a republican, added: "As I greeted the Queen she extended her hand to shake hands, I shook her hand and bowed my head."

During an interview broadcast on talk radio station 3AW, she was asked if she felt curtsying was demeaning. Ms Gillard replied: "Some things are you, some things aren't... I made a choice, I thought I would feel most comfortable with bowing my head."

But she went on to praise the Queen: "I think many Australians hold her in a great deal of affection and respect and so do I. I mean, what a life, what an incredible life she's lived over so many generations of change, and to see someone play such a steadfast role over so much change, I think, is remarkable."

Cherie Blair, the wife of former prime minister Tony Blair, reportedly refused to curtsy to the Queen. She later revealed that she actually "managed a vague kind of bob" on their first meeting and after that tended to bow instead.

Ms Gillard first met the Queen on the day of the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge's wedding - April 29 - when she was summoned to Buckingham Palace for an audience.

The Australian prime minister has backed calls for her country to become a republic. Speaking ahead of last year's general election, she said that the death of the Queen would be an "appropriate point" for Australia to end the tradition of having a British monarch as head of state.

1  of  7
PLAY
FULLSCREEN
ZOOM
SHARE THIS SLIDE 
Queen Elizabeth II and the Duke Edinburgh arrive in Canberra, Australia, for an 11 day tour of the Commonwealth country.
RATE IT!   |  
VOTE
CURRENT TOP 5 PICK YOUR OWN TOP 5
USERS WHO VOTED
NEW! CREATE YOUR OWN SLIDESHOW
FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK

Australia's prime minister Julia Gillard insisted she did not break royal protocol by deciding not to curtsy to the Queen. When the politician first greeted the monarch after her plane touched d...
Australia's prime minister Julia Gillard insisted she did not break royal protocol by deciding not to curtsy to the Queen. When the politician first greeted the monarch after her plane touched d...
Filed by Ned Simons  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 11
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
05:25 AM on 10/21/2011
LISTEN THE WOMAN LEADS A NATION - SHE NEEDS TO KNOW THESE THINGS. WHETHER SHE LIKES THE MONARCH OR NOT, THE MONARCH IS ABOVE HER AND SHE SHOULD HAVE SHOWN SOME CLASS AND GIVEN HER A COURTESY. SHE DISPLAYED IGNORANCE AND BAD MANNER FOR A LEADER OF A COUNTRY. In other statements i learned that she wants a republic..what is the difference between a prime minister and a president. Its the same position titled differently really - Australia has elections, the Monarch doesn't interfere with the rule and the houses. The elected leaders are the ones who ran government - so i don't see what he issue is about really. Its not like the Queen seats in Australia and summons her on a daily basis. The Monarch leaves the democratic process to work in Australia and the UK - they don't get involved - their benefit is stability which has helped both countries tremendously - including other nations that under her Majesty. They benefit from her than she benefits from them. So where I am standing - this lady really messed up badly and it was a bad political move - she looks bad in front of the whole world.
07:29 AM on 10/24/2011
Messed up badly? Hardly! I don't really think the world cares, Katherine. Do you remember when our previous PM Keating put his arm around the Queen? That was much more disrespectful and earned him the "Lizard of Oz" moniker in the UK.

What does it matter that the Queen is head of state? Must American women curtsy to the President? NO. Then why should Australian women perform an outdated sexist genuflection?

Her Majesty is Queen of Australia. OUR beloved monarch. WE will choose how we show respect to her, not social rules from Victorian England. Enough Australians have died defending the Crown to earn that right.

The Queen knows this well, and greatly loves her honest and loyal Australian subjects. Even if our etiquette is not always textbook.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gen230
09:43 PM on 10/20/2011
I think people are making too big a deal over this. It's not as if the Prime Minister went up to Her Majesty and actually spat in her face. Besides it doesn't appear as if the Queen was too bothered by Gillard's departure from protocol (especially considering she's not one to mince her words when something displeases her).
photo
ArchbishopBenevolent
Pre-Approved Saint, Beatific but not Canonical
09:29 PM on 10/20/2011
Prime Minister Gillard has conducted herself well. She has my respect!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WillieBlack
06:45 PM on 10/20/2011
Whether to curtsy or whether to bow the head?

On the one hand, you risk falling on your @rse; on the other, there's an outside chance you might find yourself dropping the nut on HRH.

Tricky.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
George McAulay
Delighted to meet you
06:27 PM on 10/20/2011
She leads Australia well and has accomplished much. She represents me
This comment has been removed.