London 2012: Olympic Contract For Company 'Liable' For Bhopal Sparks Protest

Olympic Stadium Wrap

Huffington Post UK   First Posted: 24/10/11 10:25 BST Updated: 22/12/11 10:12 GMT

Amnesty International has protested the decision to award an Olympic contract to a company that since 2001 has been the owner of the corporation responsible for a deadly 1984 toxic gas leak in India.

Dow Chemical Company (Dow) has been chosen by the Olympic Organising Committee (Locog) to provide the £7 million fabric wrap that will encircle the stadium during the 2012 Olympic and Paralympic games.

In 2001 Dow bought the US-based Union Carbide Corporation (UCC), which in turn held a majority share in the Indian subsidiary that owned and operated the UCC plant responsible for the disaster.

The gas leak in Bhopal, India, killed between 7,000 and 10,000 people in the immediate aftermath.

Amnesty says that a further 15,000 people have been killed as a direct result of the leak since 1984.

They claim that the site of the disaster has not been properly cleaned up, has not been investigated thoroughly enough and add that 100,000 people still suffer from health problems relating to the leak.

A settlement of $470 million was reached in 1989, but Amnesty and other activists say that does not represent the true scale of the diaster. The Indian government has since filed a fresh demand for $1.1 billion in compensation from Dow.

The decision to award the contract to Dow has sparked outrage in India, and has led to calls for a boycott.

Activists point to the Olympic ethical sourcing code, which states that it will work towards "ensuring that products and services are sourced and produced under a set of internationally acceptable environmental, social and ethical guidelines and standards".

[CLICK HERE TO READ THE OLYMPIC SUSTAINABLE SOURCING GUIDELINES]

In its letter to the Locog, Amnesty claims that Dow does not meet that requirement.

The letter, signed by Amnesty's head of business Seema Joshi, says that Dow has resisted demands by activists and campaigners to take liability for the spill and address the "outstanding demands and the ongoing impacts of the disaster".

"Amnesty International was surprised to discover that Dow was awarded the tender pursuant to a completion of a due diligence process and satisfying conditions laid out in the Locog Sustainable Sourcing Code."

"Amnesty International requests that the Locog advise as to the basis on which it has considered that Dow, given the unaddressed legacy of human rights abuses and outstanding concerns relating to legal redress in Bhopal, complies with the requirements of the code", it continues.

"The fact that Dow is an official partners of the 2012 Olympic games continues to cause shock and distress among Bhopal survivors."

The letter adds that the Locog risks "delegitimising" the calls by Bhopal survivors for Dow to take responsibility for the disaster.

After a call for comment the Locog said they had not received the letter.

A spokesperson for the committee has previously stated that Dow did not own the plant in question at the time of the tragedy.

Dow has denied responsibility for the liabilities relating to the Bhopal disaster.

In a statement published in the Independent newspaper the company said: "The state government owns and controls the site [Bhopal] and is in the best position, and has the authority under the direction of the courts to complete whatever remediation may be necessary."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK

Amnesty International has protested the decision to award an Olympic contract to a company that since 2001 has been the owner of the corporation responsible for a deadly 1984 toxic gas leak in India. ...
Amnesty International has protested the decision to award an Olympic contract to a company that since 2001 has been the owner of the corporation responsible for a deadly 1984 toxic gas leak in India. ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 8
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Aneesia
03:15 PM on 10/24/2011
Dow is %100 responsible for the disaster in Bhopol, and they still try to get out of paying for the pain and agony that they caused. This contract should be rescinded.
Bhopal was an example of what happens when companies exert their authority over the people, with the help of government, and bypass safety measures to save $$$.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Daviejohn
All the world's a stage,
01:54 PM on 10/24/2011
So you buy a motor car that seriously injured someone 20 years ago? and now the plaintiffs want more money because you bought it ? There is no logic to the claim, they accepted a half billion payout and now want more...I don't think so.
05:47 PM on 10/24/2011
Another poorly informed reply.

I'll refer to the answer I posted to a previous comment:
"Dow were found guilty, by the New York Securities and Exchange commission­, on charges of bribing Indian officials and (Dow Agro Sciences) were recently blackliste­d by the Indian Agricultur­e Ministry.
Why were they bribing Indian officials? In order to continue selling dangerous pesticides that have been banned in the US for many years- including the notorious 'Dursban'.
There are many reasons why the Indians are upset with this sponsorshi­p arrangemen­t and this is just one of them."

These are not trifling matters and, on their own, ought to be enough to see Dow as an unsuitable sponsor for the Olympic games.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Lawyer13
retired Lawyer, General and Psychiatric Nurse, wit
11:11 AM on 10/24/2011
This is totally unacceptable, the people of Bophal have never received adequate compensation, I thought the Olympic Games was to promote harmony in this world.
10:10 AM on 10/24/2011
What nonsense - let's boycott a company that 10 years ago bought a company that 15 years before owned part of a company where an industrial accident caused a lot of mayhem..

PS: How much compensation have they asked for and received from the Indian owners?
01:56 PM on 10/24/2011
Nonsense?! Worth checking your facts perhaps.

Dow were found guilty, by the New York Securities and Exchange commission, on charges of bribing Indian officials and (Dow Agro Sciences) were recently blacklisted by the Indian Agriculture Ministry.
Why were they bribing Indian officials? In order to continue selling dangerous pesticides that have been banned in the US for many years- including the notorious 'Dursban'.
There are many reasons why the Indians are upset with this sponsorship arrangement and this is just one of them.
06:34 PM on 10/24/2011
Your list of grievances may well have legitimacy.
There is NO legitimate issue in the fact that another company was complicit in a tragedy that occurred 15 years before Dow had any involvement.

Incidentally, in addition to paying all amounts that the Indian courts stipulated, Union Carbide -with permission of those Courts - sold their shares Union Carbide India Ltd, the company responsible for the tragedy - to McCleod Russial India Ltd. Hence, if there was any remaining liability that could be transferred, it now rests with that company and not with Dow.