Chancellor To Set Out 'Credit Easing' Plan In Autumn Statement

George

The Huffington Post UK   First Posted: 27/11/11 07:36 GMT Updated: 27/11/11 10:37 GMT

George Osborne is to detail a new government scheme to underwrite billions of pounds of bank lending to businesses in his autumn statement on Tuesday.

The plan is an attempt to get credit flowing to Britain's struggling small firms.

The "credit easing" scheme, which is hoped to be a “game changer” by the Treasury, is intended to stop the UK from falling back into recession by underwriting banks’ borrowing.

The institution will then be obliged to pass on the cheap lending rates to small businesses via lower interest rates.

Speaking on the Andrew Marr Show, Osborne said: "The basic idea of this national loan guarantee scheme is to use the fact that the government can borrow money very cheaply to help small businesses to borrow money more cheaply than they do at the moment."

"So the government will underwrite the loans the banks make to small businesses in order to cut the interest rates small businesses have to pay," he said.

"This will help them with their cash flow, to retain their workforces and expand and invest."

The chancellor said the treasury had set aside £20 billion for the scheme, however that “sits within an envelope that could be as big as £40 billion”.

"These are guarantees,” he said. “We [the government] are not lending the money ourselves.”

"There are lots of governments who couldn’t do this as they aren’t credit worthy,” he added.

Osborne admitted it wasn’t a decision without risk, as should a bank fail the taxpayer would be standing behind it to bail it out.

However, he insisted that it was relatively low risk given the strength of the government’s balance sheet.

The Chancellor is also expected to announce a cap for planned increases in rail fares, a nod to struggling commuters.

The government is hoping to have the scheme in place by January, which will then run for two years.

Under the proposals, a company taking out a £5 million loan would be able to borrow at 4% rather than the typical 5%, a saving of £50,000 a year.

A second scheme will see the government establish an investment fund with private sector investors, such as pensions funds to offer loans to larger companies.

A treasury spokesman said: "We all know that the cost of finance for smaller businesses has risen following the financial crisis. It's a problem people have been trying to solve since 2008, which is why these new schemes are much more radical than anything that has gone before.

"They should be a game changer for credit for small companies by cutting the cost of finance and over time opening up new options for how it is raised."

However, in a joint letter to the chancellor, his Labour counterpart Ed Balls and shadow business secretary Chuka Umunna said that credit easing alone would not halt the slide into recession.

"At the current rate, over 1,200 people a day are entering unemployment," said the letter.

"Businesses are going bankrupt at a faster rate than a year ago - despite your expressed wish for a private sector-led recovery.

"Access to credit will not in itself restore the confidence of business to invest. The country urgently needs a plan for growth and jobs."

Also speaking on The Andrew Marr Show, Balls said Labour would "look at the details of the credit easing plan before deciding whether to support it".

Speaking on Sky News, former chancellor Alistair Darling backed the idea of credit easing “if it works”.

“In principle it’s a very good idea, but the question businesses will have is how does that manifest itself in terms of loans being made available on the high street to businesses that need them.”

He warned that regardless of the scheme, no businesses were likely to open up new lines of investment or taking on new people if they didn’t have the confidence to do so.

“On its own, credit easing is not enough, but it is a welcome step,” he said.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK POLITICS

George Osborne is to detail a new government scheme to underwrite billions of pounds of bank lending to businesses in his autumn statement on Tuesday. The plan is an attempt to get credit flowing ...
George Osborne is to detail a new government scheme to underwrite billions of pounds of bank lending to businesses in his autumn statement on Tuesday. The plan is an attempt to get credit flowing ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 31
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
06:30 AM on 11/28/2011
this scheme will never work, it did not under Labour and it will not now. There is not enough profit for the banks and too involved, yes, too involved. Over and above that, as in the scheme before, it takes too long for the agreement to come through.
09:52 PM on 11/27/2011
In summary, we (the taxpayer) bailed out the banks. The Bank of England has printed piles of money to give to the banks to lend to business but they've not done much with it. Now we (the taxpayer) are going to underwrite the risk to the banks of lending the money. Why don't we cut out the middle man i.e. the banks. I personally don't trust them with our funny money.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
floodberg
Attorney (ret.)
07:52 PM on 11/27/2011
Would you trust this man to handle your personal bills?

I wouldn't.

This 'chancellor' is a trust fund kid, with one stint of a real job (a few months doing data entry for the NHS.) 

He had the responsibility of handling the RBS/Lloyd's stock securing the £65.8 Bn bailout. In January 2011 he could have sold it all and recouped the full amount.  Instead, he was politically motivated:  his party was in trouble and he'd hold it to get a 'bonanza' that they could use for pet projects and get back in favour with the voters. 

By overriding his very limited economic knowledge, failing to realize the taxpayers could have used the money back, and letting his personal motivation take over, he lost over £40 Bn very quickly; and the prices aren't going to rebound very soon.

This illustrates Osborne's true flaw;  he doesn't acknowledge understand basic concepts like ownership or loyalty, 

I wouldn't trust Osborne to handle a till at Tescos; I doubt there'd be much left at the end of the day.  Now, would anyone on HP let him handle their personal money?  I sure as sh*t wouldn't...but I handled many people's personal finances and seen what fools like this have done with millions.
06:01 PM on 11/27/2011
What the hell happened to the £75B of Quantative easing which the Bank Of England authorised six weeks ago? Are the banks still sitting on it? This is exactly the kind of thing Camoron slagged off the Labour Party for week after week. Borrowing more money. Now he has changed his tune.....Probably too late.
06:23 PM on 11/27/2011
The banks probably are still sitting on it, and this isn't borrowed money it's money that was printed. there was a worldwide credit crisis because Brown and Bush and a few others were borrowing all the money they could get their hands on to buy votes. Bush was fighting two wars, so were we for a time, and of course there are the verer bottomloss pits of Health and Welfare. The banks ran out of money, the sub-prime crisis was the result not the cause. With banks operating in a number of time-zones they were in fact lending the same money more than once. Brown of course soiled his trousers and bailed out the worst offenders, should have let them go bust but hadn't the balls to do it, well he had Balls but that's another story.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:38 PM on 11/27/2011
One of the main reason small businesses have to get loans in the first place is to tide them over becaus they are owed money from big businesses who havent paid up on time. Big businesses treat small businesses like dirt over this and it's just got worse and the practice has worse thanks to the rescession. Sorry but a big business taking 12 months to pay up has not got a debt but has used the small business to give it a 12 month unagreed interest free loan meaning its the small business that has to go to its bank and get its own loan and pay the interest thanks to the shortfall. I find this completely unaceeptable.

The government should bring in strict legislation governing prompt payment by big business to small business, but it wont as the government are in the pocket of big business. To give an example one of the first things it did after coming to power was to get millionaire tax dodger Phil Green in to do an audit of its business practices. And his main recomendation to save government money was to stop paying its bills so promptly, delay payment far longer as it would save a fortune....never mind all the small businesses the practice will put under then Phil?
06:11 PM on 11/27/2011
Have you ever been in business? Doesn't sound like you have. you sort out the payment terms before doing anything for anybody, local authorities and government departments are 30 days, submit your invoice one month and you get paid end of the next month. Once the system is in place it will run like clockwork. If you are not happy with any organisation's ability to pay get them to pay up front, no pay no play.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:45 PM on 11/27/2011
indlovubill
Yes I know about business but it strikes me and any small businessman reading your reply to my comment that you haven't got a clue. "no pay no play" dream on indlovubill thats not the way the real business world goes just the Tory boy Osbourne fantasy business world...its the big boys push the small firms around, then when times get bad use they excuse to push them around still further...maybe you could try explaining the no pay no play idea to small firms who have been squeezed to death by Tesco?
03:09 PM on 11/27/2011
He can give as much as he wants it still wont create any more jobs.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
Mickey Mouse 1
There are no lies or deceit on a chess board.
02:48 PM on 11/27/2011
This means that the taxpayer, as well as being forced to bail out the banks and Europe, will also be forced to pay for everything else initiated by self-serving politicians. The Nothern Rock has been sold at a loss and it will be many years before the taxpayer will get anything back from the sale of government owned banks. Everything the government does is underwritten by the taxpayer and its about time that we had someone to look after the taxpayer's interest in all of this.
02:40 PM on 11/27/2011
Another scam to legally transfer public tax payers money into private bank accounts. Will the UK public ever wake up and get rid of these money grabbing out of touch chancers.
02:34 PM on 11/27/2011
spot
01:37 PM on 11/27/2011
You Stupid Little Prat - this is what started the problem in the first place. Guarantee the Banks that unless they do what they are told they will be Nationalised Without compensation - That may get the attention of the Evil Theiving Criminals
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Roy Fowler
I try....I really do!
01:36 PM on 11/27/2011
Just so i have this right then;

We the taxpayers, have given £300 BILLION of our money to the very banks who ruined our economy and who are STILL raping our savings, ruining nations and pensions and yet are STILL paying themselves huge bonuses?

The Banks then decided to keep it or to give out only a small amount to the SME's (with a profit for them built in of course); then, because they are not giving out enough of the Taxpayers money, the Government has decided that the best way to encourage the lending of taxpayers money is now to tell that banks that taxpayers money can now be given out and if SME's default or fall behind, then the Government will cover their "losses" with MORE Taxpayers money?????

How the hell do I become a bank.....because this sounds like a sweet, sweet deal to me!!!!!!!

But dont forget folks "We are all in this together!"
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:19 PM on 11/27/2011
Bibery to the people to keep quite about the banks not passing out the bailout we the taxpayers gave them. Now we have the government giving us back our own money as bribes or maybe George got the money from the IMF putting us in more debt. The banks should be doing this, but because they are making money from keeping the tax payers bailout money and the bonuses paid from the "profits" not losses. Georgy boy does not want us to turn against his backers.
01:09 PM on 11/27/2011
This is just another scam to give more money to the Banks , Osborne is a Bildergerger.

What does it matter what the interest rate is , this is purely about the banks making more money for no risk. Big business , big corporations fleecing ordinary people.

The Bilderberg group seem to be getting closer & closer to fulfilling their ultimate ambition to control every facet of our lives.

Why does nobody question why Osborne & Cameron go to the Bilderberg secret meetings , its pretty obvious its not for this country's interests
12:50 PM on 11/27/2011
He's doing it again he is taking money of the poor and giving it to his banking mates, when will it stop and when will this shower start doing things for the majority of people in our Country?
This comment has been removed.