John Bercow Coat Of Arms: House Of Commons Speaker Accused Of Wasting £37,000 Taxpayer Money


First Posted: 28/11/11 21:05 GMT Updated: 28/11/11 21:22 GMT   PA

House of Commons Speaker John Bercow has been accused of blowing £37,000 of taxpayers' money on a "vanity" portrait complete with personal coat of arms.

The official painting, by British artist Brendan Kelly, joins those of his predecessors going back to Sir Thomas More. It shows Mr Bercow in full flow in the famous Speaker's chair, wearing black robes and a Commons tie.


The Speaker has been accused of wasting taxpayers' money

The frame features a new heraldic symbol developed by the College of Arms.

A ladder represents the humble beginnings of the Speaker's family, while four roundels signify his fondness for tennis and role as chairman of the Boundary Commissions of England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.

Scimitars, as used on the coat of arms of Essex, refer to the fact that Mr Bercow went to university in the county.

His motto, "all are equal", is punctuated by pink triangles which stand for his championing of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) rights. Rainbow colours on the scroll represent the flag of equality.

The portrait has been added to the Parliamentary Art Collection, and will be hung in the Speaker's residence alongside those of recent holders of the office such as Baroness Boothroyd and Lord Martin of Springburn.

But the cost of the work - met out of the House budget - drew immediate criticism. Kelly was paid a fee of £22,000 for the commission, while £15,000 was spent on "framing and heraldic painting" to maintain the style of previous portraits.

Mathew Sinclair, director of pressure group the TaxPayers' Alliance, said: "It's very excessive at this time of public sector austerity for the Speaker to spend tens of thousands of pounds on a vanity portrait of himself.

"Following the MPs' expenses scandal, Parliament should be cutting costs, not throwing taxpayers' money away boosting John Bercow's ego. Michael Martin was thrown from the job for wasting taxpayers' money, so the current Speaker should be much more careful with how he spends our hard-earned cash."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK POLITICS

House of Commons Speaker John Bercow has been accused of blowing £37,000 of taxpayers' money on a "vanity" portrait complete with personal coat of arms. The official painting, by British artist Br...
House of Commons Speaker John Bercow has been accused of blowing £37,000 of taxpayers' money on a "vanity" portrait complete with personal coat of arms. The official painting, by British artist Br...
Filed by Stephen Hull  |  Report Corrections
 
 
  • Comments
  • 37
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
halingei
11:55 AM on 12/12/2011
'But some are more equal than others'?
Remember what happened to the guy who chose a squirrel for his emblem!
No such luck this time, I suppose?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Daviejohn
All the world's a stage,
11:04 AM on 11/29/2011
Are those gold coins going up the ladder? the higher the rung the larger the coin.
11:03 AM on 11/29/2011
Surely a passport photograph would be enough...what price vanity!!! As an unequal equal I resent paying this from my tax !!!
10:46 AM on 11/29/2011
I'm at odds with the scimitar, surely a vibrator, caravan and the motto, "get me outa here" would have been more appropriate for the families C of A
09:55 AM on 11/29/2011
Why should an MP from Buckingham get a coat of arms at oublix expense. It may be tradition for the Speaker to be portrayed but a coat of arms??
All are equal, of course, unless you are a member of the majority when you must give way to minorities, racial, sexual or religious..
09:48 AM on 11/29/2011
Something is missing in that coat of arms...

------ & ladders; board game (6)
09:33 AM on 11/29/2011
That is Westminsters's price. I could get it done for half the price in Northampton.

I respect the man, he is an embodiment of his motto, I wonder if he is a first generation or second generation immigrant.
katertaif
My wife thinks I have one fault. Everything I do!
09:29 AM on 11/29/2011
I like the motto. All are equal eh? Trouble is that MP's think they are more equal than anyone else.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
eva belle
Kolob a-calling
09:29 AM on 11/29/2011
I am not sure why people here are moaning about this, all his predecessors did it, why shouldn't he? Also I like the message on his.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:54 AM on 11/29/2011
Just because his predecessors has done it, it doesn't make it right. It's public money, that's why people are moaning. He should use his own money for his coat of pride, not the public purse. It's a real lack of judgement to spend this money when everyone else faces severe cuts.
09:18 AM on 11/29/2011
Well he should pay for it, he wanted he pays for it not the tax payer cough up mate
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:15 AM on 11/29/2011
I cannot believe that this man still does not know the difference between public money and private money. So let me make it clear Mr Bercow:
If it's public money, it has to have an audit trail and be spent for the public good, not on self promotion (take note Ken Livinstone).
If it's private money, if you've earned it, then spend it on any excesses you like, providing it's legal.
Simple.
08:46 AM on 11/29/2011
The 'Squeaker' should spend his own money on an ego trip.

This little man would become a classic dictator if given free reign - what gave him the right to fritter our cash when so many are out of work or struggling to make end meet?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NOSHER
08:26 AM on 11/29/2011
ITS DISGRACEFULL WHEN A GOVERMENT SPENDS THIS MONEY WHEN PEOPLE ARE SKINT BUT THATS THEM TOSSERS
08:41 AM on 11/29/2011
What's also disgracefu­l is people educated at publuc expense posting ill-spelle­d and abusive comments. (reposted as original comment didn't appear - and when it did it contained a typo! Moral: don't type in the dark)
07:28 AM on 11/29/2011
I am all for the independence of the Speaker.
How much extra would the words ' But some are more equal than others ' have cost ?
The difference between the rich & poor, the haves & have nots, the employed & the ones who cannot or do not work in our society becomes more & more apparrent & distressing day by day.
At its mildest this is a waste of public money.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MancRat
06:48 AM on 11/29/2011
This is a Parliamentary tradition so it's not something John Bercow would have done over and above his normal duties as Speaker. However the Daily Mail is using it to bash him yet again as their campaign against the genuinely neutral Speaker continues.

Like or loathe him, he's at least actively holding ConDems to account and running the House to its rules rather that letting Cameron have his way. His crest is also a less than subtle poke in the eye for the crusty right wing constitutional experts we hear far too much from.
08:31 AM on 11/29/2011
Agree with you or not, you post is well argued and not in the least offensive. If only more people could engage brain before posting.