Leveson Inquiry: Charlotte Church Turned Down £100,000 For 'Favourable' Press

Church

The Huffington Post UK   First Posted: 28/11/11 15:22 GMT Updated: 28/11/11 16:01 GMT

Charlotte Church sang at Rupert Murdoch’s wedding for free in exchange for favourable publicity, the Leveson Inquiry has heard.

The 'Voice of an Angel' singer, who was 13 at the time, could charge up to £100,000 per performance, but waived the usual fee when told she "would be looked upon favourably by Murdoch's papers".

"I remember being told that Rupert Murdoch had asked me to sing at his wedding to Wendi Deng and it would take place on his yacht in New York," she said.

"I remember being told that the offer of money or the offer of the favour, in order to basically get good press, to be looked upon favourably. And I also remember being 13 and thinking, 'why on earth would anybody take a favour over £100,000?'."

Murdoch and News International deny that any such offer was made.

During an uncomfortable session of questioning, Church, now 25, told how earlier this year police had informed her that her phone had been hacked and monitored by private investigator Glenn Mulcaire when she was 17.

“They had passwords, pin numbers, phone numbers of lots of people in my life, my mother, my father, their friends, my friends, my old boyfriend's number, it was quite substantial,” she told Leveson, referring to it as a “massive black book, which seemed to be full of information”.

The inquiry also heard of how an article in the News of the World detailed allegations that her father was having an affair. "I see no public interest in this story except to sell papers," she said, adding that it had a huge effect on her mother and a "massive psychological impact on me".

“I think I've just blanked out how bad these articles were," Church said.

"It was totally sensationalised, whether partially or wholly true. And I just really hated the fact that my parents who had never been in this industry – apart from looking after me – were being exposed and vilified in this fashion. It had a massive, massive impact on my family life.”

The singer also told of how The Sun ran a story during the early months of her first pregnancy, entitled “Church sober shock".

She said she believed the newspaper had found out about her pregnancy from phone hacking.

Church also told of how photographers cut a hole in the hedge outside her home, through which members of the press could fit a camera, as well as a 'countdown clock' that appeared on The Sun's website, running down to the singer's 16th birthday with the innuendo of her reaching the age of (sexual) consent.

"It made me feel horrible... I was really uncomfortable with it," she said.

live blog

Oldest Newest

The Inquiry will resume on Tuesday at 10am.

Share this:

Leveson made an order demanding Alastair Campbell's witness statement be removed. The owner of the website, Paul Staines, has been summoned to appear before Leveson on Wednesday to explain how he acquired the document.

Share this:

Leveson turns his attention to the Guido Fawkes issue for this morning and decides he must give a ruling about the problem.

Share this:
@ jamesro47 : Broadcast experience shows proprietors need not fear regulation, Diamond says. Fair point #leveson

Share this:

Diamond tells Leveson directly: "It doesn't have to be like this. It's so sad that a handful of journalists have besmirched the press in this way."

Share this:

Diamond praises collaboration with The Sun over cot death and relationship with tabloid media in general: "We were a force for good... the popular press is nothing to be ashamed of in this country. It can be a force for good."

"There are two sides to the press. I've no doubt they would pursue me now in the same way as in the past."

Share this:

Diamond wrote a 'supportive' article, congratulating the actress Dawn French about her weight loss. Leveson asks how she makes the judgement about what and who to write about after such press intrusuion into her private life. Diamond's reply is that it does come down to 'a judgement call' , personal values as well as 'taste and decency'.

Share this:

Diamond says that the broadcast media have to conform to strict guidelines regarding code of conduct without journalism beein negatively affected. She sees no reason why there shouldn't be a similar code for other media.

Share this:
@ SkyFixer69 : Other papers then ran spoiler stories that we'd done a deal with the Sun allowing the access to the funeral. #Diamond #Leveson

Share this:

http://twitter.com/#!/bargeboards/status/141179639916793857

Share this:

http://twitter.com/#!/NatashaSHenry/status/141179397590884353

Share this:

http://twitter.com/#!/KJBar/status/141178987278893056

Share this:

Media quickly appeared on Diamond's doorstep when they discovered her son was found dead. One rpeorter had to physically ejected from their house. Diamond had rung her local priest to come over but he had felt too overwhelmed by the press presence that he had left.

Diamond wrote to the editors of every national newspaper, begging them not to stay away form the funeral. All of them did except for one photographer 'with a very long lense'.

Share this:
@ rosschawkins : Anne Diamond at #leveson : Sun journo offered her nanny 30k for selling story. Sun then phoned AD and said they'd bought her up

Share this:

When Diamond was about to give birth, staff told her they had had to throw a journalist out of the hospital who had been posing as a doctor.

Share this:

Diamond had a scare in the early stages of her first pregnancy and thought she was going to lose her unborn baby. When contacted the same day by a journalist from the NOTW, she denied she was pregnant. When she confirmed the pregnancy some time later, the paper called her a liar.

Share this:

Diamond says there were consistent negative stories about her following an encounter with Rupert Murdoch when Diamond asked the media mogul how he could sleep at night when sections of his empire were intent on ruining people's lives.

Share this:

Anne Diamond 'catapulted' into the public eye when she joined Breakfast TV in 1983. She says that as a journalist she has seen both sides of press activities in terms of writing about others as well as being written about.

Share this:

Church responds to Paul Dacre comments that newspapers are reporting on the misdeeds of the 'rich, powerful and pompous' by claiming many of these editors are probably rich and powerful (while demurring from adding pompous) and that they could be targets for similar press attention.

Church ends her evidence to Leveson.

Share this:

"[The PCC] is totally inadequate. They don't deal with the problems, they don't deal with it at all."

Share this:

Church describes how media reports twisted and distorted comments she made following the 911 attacks and how it led to a huge backlash against her in the United States, so much so that her record company sought protection for her chruch was 15 at the time.

Share this:

The Daily Mail wrote a story about a holiday she took with a group of girlfriends when when she was 18. The piece was titled "Vice of an angel". Church says it was massively exaggerated.

Share this:

Church's first boyfriend sold a story about their relationship when she was 17, revealing "intimate sexual details."

Share this:
@ rosschawkins : Charlotte Church at #leveson : says she kept friends out of her life for fear they were leaking. In fact her phone was hacked

Share this:
@ benfenton : #Church prefers mags eg Hello! because They do take nice photos and they actually print what you say. Lesser of 2 evils. #leveson

Share this:
@ rosschawkins : Charlotte Church at #leveson : threat to kidnap her was published in News o t Wrld asked paper not to say where she lived. They did anyway

Share this:

News of the World article published detailing allegations that her father was having an affair. "I see no public interest in this story except to sell papers." Had a huge effect on her mother and a "massive psychological impact on me".

Share this:

Church talks about the increase in paparazzi focus on her as she got older between the ages of 16 and 20 and believes the media got hold of the fact that she was pregnant through underhand and possible illegal methods.

Share this:

Tells Leveson about a 'countdown clock' in The Sun running down to Chuch's 16th birthday with the innuendo of her reaching the age of (sexual) consent. "It made me feel horrible... I was really uncomfortable with it."

Share this:

Church claims that she was asked to sing at Rupert Murdoch's wedding in New York. She was offered a £100,000 fee or assurances that his media organisations' would look 'favourably' on her.

Share this:


FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK

Charlotte Church sang at Rupert Murdoch’s wedding for free in exchange for favourable publicity, the Leveson Inquiry has heard. The 'Voice of an Angel' singer, who was 13 at the time, could char...
Charlotte Church sang at Rupert Murdoch’s wedding for free in exchange for favourable publicity, the Leveson Inquiry has heard. The 'Voice of an Angel' singer, who was 13 at the time, could char...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 19
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Lawyer13
retired Lawyer, General and Psychiatric Nurse, wit
10:24 AM on 11/29/2011
She has a great voice, and was only 13 years old when this offer was made, her Management told her to turn down the money, but I ask myself is anyone worth £100,000 for singing at a wedding, I think such a sum is outrageous by any normal standards.
09:44 AM on 11/29/2011
No excuses for the mafia like tactics of Murdoch and associates, but you get the feeling that these so called celebrities only want the public to see them on their good side , as well as now jumping on any possible compensation bandwagon.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Vapula
Failure is not an option
03:51 AM on 11/29/2011
The Murdoch's are like festering boils on society. They need to be lanced.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Lawyer13
retired Lawyer, General and Psychiatric Nurse, wit
10:25 AM on 11/29/2011
Times two my good friend.
09:50 PM on 11/28/2011
Very simple - you make it a CRIMINAL offence with a fixed penalty of 10 years for the Editor of any paper that publishes matters concerning the private life of people without their express permission - you can bet all these salacious stories in the gutter press would cease after the first Editor who transgressed was sent down - self regulation of the press is a joke - it is like expecting turkeys to vote for Christmas ..

You don't get these salacious stories in the French press as the Editors and journalists would be jailed - there is a world of difference between what is " in the public interest " and what is " of interest to the public " Ms Church's private life may be of " interest to the public " but is NOT a matter of " public interest "
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paul Houston
British and a London resident
09:05 PM on 11/28/2011
Some of the most shocking allegations made at the inquiry have been by people who have come under suspicion of having committed a crime, which is then followed up by media speculation and innuendo about the suspects life. And the media complains about the UK libel laws. The only way to make the press behave is if they have to make large libel payouts in the courts.
photo
Theatrixnyc
Remember John Lennon:Power To The People!
09:26 PM on 11/28/2011
Sure. And Prison Time. Some sort of time spent alone, thinking about the hurt their lies created.
10:06 PM on 11/28/2011
The problem is the libel payouts are insufficently high - if the litigant says they will donate the award to charity the Judge should have powers too then uplift the award 100 times - the first time a paper has to pay out £100 million you can bet libel will end - or at least some charities will benefit !!!
06:13 PM on 11/28/2011
When does cooperation with the paper "or else" turn into blackmail and forced cooperation with the threat of bad press? Has an ethical line been crossed here?
07:26 AM on 11/29/2011
Yes, Kenz300, I share your concerns. The allegations are disputed, but if proven would arguably amount to a PROTECTION RACKET.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Lawyer13
retired Lawyer, General and Psychiatric Nurse, wit
10:27 AM on 11/29/2011
It's a typical Mafia tactict and that's what the Murdoch's are gangsters pure and simple
06:11 PM on 11/28/2011
How much of the "press" coverage of all the "news" was political spin and infomercials for those favored people, politicians and policy that News Corp and its wealthy, connected owners were promoting?

These do not appear to be news organizations. They appear to be carefully crafted, agenda driven advertisements for what ever the paper was promoting.
05:48 PM on 11/28/2011
Sticking the boot in 12 years later sort of wrecks her credibility.
06:26 PM on 11/28/2011
Absolutely - she should have insisted that the Leveson inquiry took place in 1999, so as not to destroy her credibility. Pretty stupid for a 13 year old not to have thought of this.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Fozwords
Abandon hope when you post on here
08:48 PM on 11/28/2011
I think the words pretty and stupid sum her up perfectly
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Lawyer13
retired Lawyer, General and Psychiatric Nurse, wit
10:30 AM on 11/29/2011
What a well crafted insightful post. F & F.
05:46 PM on 11/28/2011
glorified perverted peeping toms
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paul Wagland
Resistance is fertile
05:30 PM on 11/28/2011
Charlotte Church seems to have had three choices:

1) Don't sing at Murdoch's wedding.
2) Sing at the wedding for her normal fee (£100k).
3) Sing at the wedding for free.

Only if she goes with choice 3 does Murdoch promise his media empire will play nicely.

Until now I'd thought the Mafia comparisons were a bit 'over the top'. Seems like he made her an offer she couldn't refuse.
05:24 PM on 11/28/2011
The evidence is clear, Murdoch "newspapers" routinely engage in criminal behaviour and uses menaces to get co-operation. In any reasonable society they would be closed down and prosecuted, the management is not fit and proper because they have set this culture and it goes right to the top of the organisation with Rupert himself acting like a latter day Don Corleone.
If the authorites have the guts and poitical will to confornt this gang then other players almost equally culpable may be restrained, but that's doubtful with the craven cowardice and corruption that seems so endemic in British public life.