Iran: EU Impose Fresh Sanctions Following Nuclear Report

Iran

The Huffington Post UK   First Posted: 01/12/11 16:28 GMT Updated: 01/12/11 17:40 GMT

The European Union has agreed to impose fresh sanctions on Iran following a report by the UN's atomic agency that said Tehran was planning to build nuclear weapons.

Sanctions have also been extended to Syria, following 10 months of a brutal crackdown against pro-democracy protesters, in which more than 3,500 people have been killed.

Following a meeting of in Brussels on Thursday, ministers agreed to place sanctions on 39 individuals and 141 businesses, including the freezing of assets and travel bans.

In a statement released after the meeting, the sanctions on Iran were said to be aimed at "severely affecting the Iranian financial system, in the transport sector, in the energy sector".

Before the meeting, William Hague had called for an increased "isolation" of the Iranian regime after the storming of the British embassy in Tehran on Sunday.

A week before, the British Foreign Office imposed its own sanctions on all Iranian banks, leading to chants of "death to Britain" in the Iranian parliament.

However, the EU said the new sanctions had no connection with the breach in the Vienna Convention, covering the security of diplomats and foreign property.

Subsequent to the ransacking of the embassy, the British government withdrew its diplomats and consulate staff. France, Germany, Netherlands and Italy have since done likewise.

In a statement, EU ministers said: "The council agreed to broaden existing sanctions by examining, in close co-ordination with international partners, additional measures including measures aimed at severely affecting the Iranian financial system, in the transport sector, in the energy sector."

The sanctions will not include the banning or Iranian oil, though minister did leave the door open for a new round of sanctions in January.

Speaking to BBC Radio 4's Today programme, Hague said: "Our long-term concern is, of course, the nuclear programme, the danger that poses to the peace of the Middle East and the wider world, the threat of proliferation spreading to other countries in the region."

After the meeting, Hague welcomed the further package of EU sanctions

"This tenth round of sanctions aims to increase pressure on the Syrian regime to stop the continuing violent repression of the Syrian people. EU sanctions stand alongside measures introduced by Turkey yesterday including the freezing of assets belonging to Assad and individuals in the regime, and the Arab League’s decision to impose unprecedented sanctions. I welcome these moves which send a clear message that the Syrian regime’s actions have left it isolated. “EU sanctions are part of a broad international response to the horrific abuses perpetrated by a regime that has lost legitimacy. The UN Human Rights Council’s Commission of Inquiry report, issued on 21 November, highlighted the systematic and wide ranging nature of these abuses including through compelling testimony from many of those who have suffered at the hands of the Syrian regime. The UK worked closely with international and regional partners to secure a third UN Human Rights Council special session on Syria, on Friday 2 December."
The foreign secretary also added his support the Arab League’s efforts to end to the violence in Syria.
FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK

The European Union has agreed to impose fresh sanctions on Iran following a report by the UN's atomic agency that said Tehran was planning to build nuclear weapons. Sanctions have also been extend...
The European Union has agreed to impose fresh sanctions on Iran following a report by the UN's atomic agency that said Tehran was planning to build nuclear weapons. Sanctions have also been extend...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 41
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
01:36 AM on 12/04/2011
Need a new war to replace Iraq and Afghanistan. That's all it is. Our MIC needs fresh meat.
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
01:45 AM on 12/05/2011
http://www.thebulletin.org/web-edition/features/deconstructing-the-meaning-of-irans-20-percent-uranium-enrichment

It's political posturing, not bombs, not fueling the research reactor.
Syllogizer
Barely Left of Pobedonostsev
05:04 PM on 12/05/2011
That is a good article. However, it is not as unequivocal as you are in making that conclusion. On the contrary: they are quite explicit about admitting that this could be a significant step on the way to making a bomb. Several times, it says things like, "And a stockpile of 20 percent enriched uranium would significantly reduce Tehran's time to a bomb."
01:08 AM on 12/02/2011
I feel sorry for the decent people of Iran, so many face extra hardship because of their maniacal government and leadership. Iran does not need nuclear power for heating, lighting etc. There is enough oil there for a thousand years. It will not be long before the people who really matter ie the 99% have their own arab spring and get rid of this fascist, islamic dictatorship. There is no place in this world for this lot, it will only lead to more war and missiles raining down on innocent people.
12:26 AM on 12/02/2011
The EU said new sanctions had no connection with the security breach of diplomats and foreign property................but it helped.

''proliferation'' ...........rapid increase and excessive spread: nuclear proliferation.
12:06 AM on 12/02/2011
Err....Didn't the Japanese bomb Pearl Harbour after the USA had imposed economic sanctions on Japan? Yes, and the Japanese got nuked.

If Iran manages to produce a weapon, how swiftly will they use it? Are EU defence systems about to be switched on? Is there enough time for the UN to debate?
10:57 PM on 12/01/2011
Not too long now until another election in iran , this time after the arab uprisings I think the people will not be silenced .
Syllogizer
Barely Left of Pobedonostsev
04:31 PM on 12/04/2011
Then think harder. Iran already had its own attempt at "arab spring" -- it was brutally and successfully repressed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paul Wagland
Resistance is fertile
10:14 PM on 12/01/2011
I have to say, if I had a neighbour like Israel I'd want a nuclear deterrent. It would be greatly preferable if neither Iran nor Israel had the bomb, of course.

I do feel like this beating of chests (mostly by the UK) is contrived though. Couldn't Europe just guarantee Iranian security in the face of Israeli aggression? Make a treaty, like we used to? Maybe that's totally naive, but I don't think isolating the Iranians is the way to avoid conflict.
11:10 PM on 12/01/2011
I would be happy with an agrement that any Israeli attack on Iran would result in an all out immediate European retalitory strike on Israel - and any attack by Iran on any of its neighbours or Israel would bring about an all out immediate retaliatory strike - whoever started it would cease to exist within hours - that would concentrate minds wonderfully .
09:52 PM on 12/01/2011
I hope they can solve the problem with Iran with talks . The people of Iran do not want a war its the regime .
12:02 AM on 12/02/2011
That is what they said in the 1930's turned out the German people were just as keen on a war as Adolf - I suspect a piece of paper from Iran promising " peace in out time " would prove to be about as convincing .


What they need to be told clearly is that any agression or preparations for agression will result in their elimination- when you have them by the short and curlies their hearts and minds quickly follow !!!!!!
09:48 PM on 12/01/2011
Bet Tehran are worried by the prospect of a bankrupt dictatorship imposing conditions and sanctions upon them in the name of a democracy that none of u have!
10:54 PM on 12/01/2011
May I remind you that brown and labour have left the building , some 18 months now .
10:20 AM on 12/02/2011
yes but the country is still Bankrupt & a dictatorship? - possibly not in the traditional sense but ALL their policies seem to revolve around their millionaire buddies in big business & the financial sector - the people they were elected to represent are getting screwed hence all the strikes, civil unrest, state surveillance -

I think it is known as corporate fascism
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mfa11e
Tell the truth ,regardless
09:41 PM on 12/01/2011
Iran has over 1 million soldiers.Think about that.Remember Blair saying in a solemn manner that Iraq had WMD and we were forced to believed it.Show me the proof,,actual proof,photos etc,not rhetoric Certain people and countries want us to go to war,regardless off the suffering and deaths.,and certain people will make millions ,if not billions at the end of it.Look at the Bush family and the Blairs
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Lawyer13
retired Lawyer, General and Psychiatric Nurse, wit
09:26 PM on 12/01/2011
Sanctions by the EU are welcome, but unfortunately most of the wealth of Iran is in oil and this mainly goes to China.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paul Wagland
Resistance is fertile
09:51 AM on 12/02/2011
True, Iran has a very robust economy. One of the World's best credit balances.
12:02 PM on 12/02/2011
Iran could have the last laugh here
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/9bae9a54-1cc2-11e1-a134-00144feabdc0.html#axzz1fAzBhWCM
09:13 PM on 12/01/2011
EU concentrate on the mess you'r in and get your house in order, before you poke your nose into other countrys affairs
08:13 PM on 12/01/2011
I genuinely do not believe that the West is seeking war with Iran, and further believe that this is not about oil which seems to be the usual stock excuse that everyone uses to diss the actions of the West.

The UK is simply not equipped to invade Iran it would probably struggle to take the Isle on Mann after recent defence cuts.

I just wish the Iranians would just open up for inspections. I thought that after the mutual goodwill shown after the Bam earthquake that the spirit of openness was to follow.

You do have to ask, if there is no nuclear weapon programme, why they dont allow neutral inspections?
photo
karim banned
A fool's mind is at the mercy of his tongue and a
08:51 PM on 12/01/2011
Iran is the most ispaected country in history of IAEA with regards to number of cameras and inspectors and resources IAEA allocate to Iran.

What do you mean open up for inspection? Like if Iran is like Israel or North Korea that closed their doors to IAEA.
06:03 AM on 12/02/2011
So Iran would rather go to the brink of war than comply with inspection? This seems rather ridiculous if all they have to hide is a domestic nuclear energy programme.

Im not a great fan of Israel or North Korea either. They are not however party to the NPT (Israel never signed and North Korea withdrew) whereas Iran is. If Iran wants or is developing nuclear weapons why doesnt it just say so and withdraw from the NPT?
10:25 AM on 12/02/2011
but they do allow the inspectors in - Unlike Israel who has hundreds of Nukes & is threatening to attack Iran on a daily basis and who has NEVER admitted IAEA inspectors in.
07:36 PM on 12/01/2011
I take it we can expect to be invading this country before long then?
I hope im wrong as it is the last thing we need.
The problem with Iran is the population are scared for their lives, if they do anything wrong that the leader doesnt like, then the are likely to be killed.
If we was to invade then, it would probably be quick, as the vast majority of the country would be behind anyone that would help get rid of the dictoator that has ruined there lives.
10:29 AM on 12/02/2011
It would not be quick.
Iran is not iraq, Afghan or Libya. It would be catastrophic & quickly escalate into a massive regional conflict
They would sink half the US fleet in the region within days, destroy US bases across the region
They would hit Israel with 150,000 missiles within hours of being attacked
Dont forget Russia & China support Iran & they DEFINITELY do have nukes - thousands of them
01:27 PM on 12/02/2011
Yes i agree Iran isnt Iraq, the difference is that the Iranians live in fear, and would turn on there leader in seconds.
And i think you over estimate the links with Russia and China, as we have a great economic hold over both of these countries.
Just about all Russias gas sales are to Europe, and China sells just about every export to Europe and the US. So with that kind of financial pressure those countries would be very reluctant to back Iran, especially with the whole world against them.
Syllogizer
Barely Left of Pobedonostsev
06:08 PM on 12/01/2011
I am glad the EU can see so clearly what Iran's apologists cannot: Iran really is working very hard on a nuclear bomb program.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jacksdad41
Quant Je Puis
06:37 PM on 12/01/2011
It appears the President went to the Ayatollah in order to release the 6 kidnap victims who were just about to be moved to a different location, presumably to be used as bargaining chips for withdrawing sanctions. The Ayatollah intervened and the 6 were freed. The president is keen to heal the rift between Iran and the rest of the world as their only ally of note in the region is Syria. In return for resumption of relations he requests the unfreezing of EU held assets and the further production of highly enriched Uranium - Seems pretty reasonable on the surface but within the above lies 2 critical points - why should or how come the President of any country needs to seek the help of a cleric in order to gain any sort of permissions and why is he seeking highly enriched Uranium when low enriched Uranium would suffice for power generation purposes. My short answwer would be that we would have a fundementalist Islamic country in the region with a nuclear capability. How scary is that scenario??
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Lawyer13
retired Lawyer, General and Psychiatric Nurse, wit
09:29 PM on 12/01/2011
You are quite correct the have already said they want to wipe Israel off the map. F & F
12:01 PM on 12/02/2011
except if you read the actual translation of the speech he did not say that at all - you are just parroting a soundbyte