High Speed Rail Decision Delayed Until 2012

Hs2

The Huffington Post UK   First Posted: 06/12/11 11:01 GMT Updated: 06/12/11 11:01 GMT

The government is to delay any decision as to whether to go ahead with High Speed Rail 2 (HS2) until next year, the transport secretary has announced.

Justine Greening said today that she needed more time to consider the options.

Ministers consulted on the HS2 project earlier this year and had initial pledged to report back its findings to Parliament in December.

"Since taking up office in October I have been considering the issues, raised as part of the consultation and additionally have listened to the views of Honourable Members," she said in a written statement to Parliament.

"In order to ensure that my decision is based on a careful consideration of all relevant factors, I have concluded that I should allow myself until early in 2012 to announce my decisions.

"I am therefore notifying the House that I will not be making a further statement on the subject of high speed rail this year, but I expect to announce my decisions in January."

The new rail link is link London to Birmingham and ultimately from Birmingham to the North West and North East of England.

But there has been widespread opposition to the plan, not least among Conservative MPs through whose midlands constituencies the track would dissect.

Opponents include Welsh secretary Cheryl Gillan who has promised to resign from the cabinet if the plan goes ahead. While she is secretary of state for Wales, Gillan holds a Buckinghamshire seat.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK POLITICS

The government is to delay any decision as to whether to go ahead with High Speed Rail 2 (HS2) until next year, the transport secretary has announced. Justine Greening said today that she needed mo...
The government is to delay any decision as to whether to go ahead with High Speed Rail 2 (HS2) until next year, the transport secretary has announced. Justine Greening said today that she needed mo...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 3
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
09:12 PM on 12/07/2011
The project costs are near $100 Billion. The Federal grants are a measley $3 Billion. That means Californians will need to pony up the nearly $97 Billion that's left. This - at a time when their Governor is begging voters to raise their own taxes just to cover their ALREADY deeply-deficited budget. What part of "you're broke" don't these pro-rail liberals seem to understand?????
11:01 AM on 12/07/2011
This is the biggest waste of money.
Why when the rail is private is tax payers money paying for this to be built??
Isnt the idea of it being private that it doesnt cost the tax payer?
If the tax payer is paying for it, then we may as well nationalise it again, and then maybe the cost of a ticket will come down.
01:03 AM on 12/07/2011
As the price of oil continues to rise we will all wish there were more public transit options we could use.

It is time to end the oil monopoly on transportation fuels.

Bring on the electric, flex-fuel, hybrid, CNG, LNG and hydrogen powered vehicles.