Sir Richard Branson: Renewable Aviation Fuel Will Be Standard Within 10 Years

Branson

First Posted: 06/12/11 08:12 GMT Updated: 06/12/11 08:26 GMT   PA

Sir Richard Branson has voiced hope that planes could be powered mostly by renewable fuels by the end of the decade, as a scheme analysing options for "clean" aviation fuels was launched.

The Carbon War Room, founded by the leading businessman to help drive entrepreneurial solutions to climate change, is turning its attention to the aviation industry in a bid to cut a billion tonnes of greenhouse gases from the sector.

The RenewableJetFuels.org initiative analyses the leading companies who are developing green aviation fuels to assess their sustainability, economic viability and ability to scale up to commercial levels of production.

Sir Richard said innovative new aviation fuels, including fuels sourced from the carbon put out by steel and aluminium works and from algae, were being developed.

The new initiative aims to drive investment towards the most innovative and sustainable options for cleaner fuels for the industry, which contributes 2-3% of global carbon emissions, he said.

Biofuels, which create fuel from plant sources, have been controversial amid concerns they divert land from growing food and can contribute to the clearing of forests to supply land - which adds to emissions overall.

But Sir Richard said the Carbon War Room aimed to reduce carbon dramatically in sectors such as the airline industry without causing damage to the economy, environment or food supplies.

"If we can find fuels that can fuel our planes that are not polluting the environment, that is extremely good news for the planet," he said.

"I think by 2020 potentially, if these suppliers can supply enough fuel, we really could be flying most planes on clean fuels.

"The airline industry could be one of the first industries to go from being a dirty industry to being a clean industry and it could bring the costs of flights down, because they're already finding that producing these fuels is cheaper than the current price of aviation fuel."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK

Sir Richard Branson has voiced hope that planes could be powered mostly by renewable fuels by the end of the decade, as a scheme analysing options for "clean" aviation fuels was launched. The Carbo...
Sir Richard Branson has voiced hope that planes could be powered mostly by renewable fuels by the end of the decade, as a scheme analysing options for "clean" aviation fuels was launched. The Carbo...
Filed by Michael Rundle  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 14
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
12:05 AM on 02/02/2012
CONS:

Scale - difficulty replicating lab results into larger volume of production

Growing - using open ponds are easily contaminated, PBR's (photobioreactors) can be expensive

Processing - challenges to harvesting & extracting oil

Differing results from strains, environmental conditions, growing systems

If chemicals are used to extract oil or process fuel, exhaust can be toxic

Environmental Concerns - especially with GM (genetically modified) algae - what if it disrupts the ecosystem?

Carbon Capture - is it really feasible? Can algae keep up with the output? What about during the night when algae is not active? Can waste be reliably transferred into the algae? Are the right growing conditions and enough land there to cultivate the algae? ("to fully use the emissions from a 50 MWe natural gas fired power plant land would require 2200 acres of algae.") Additional nutrients are required, such as N, P, or K, which must be added in precise amounts and typically come from chemicals like ammonia or nitrate and phosphorous. Taking into consideration all of the processing, is there a net capture of CO2? Also, capturing the carbon is not true sequestration, as it will be burned again as fuel.

Learn how to make algae biofuels:
Algae Biodiesel: http://www.organicmechanic.com/algae-to-biodiesel/
Algae Ethanol: http://www.organicmechanic.com/algae-ethanol/

To see how to scale algae fuels and materials into entrepreneurial pursuits, see Algae Business:
http://www.organicmechanic.com/algae-business/

Let me know if there are any questions about algae, or biofuel equipment!

Best,
Chris
12:00 AM on 02/02/2012
I think we are on the verge of a revolution in biofuels and materials due to algae.

Algae can be made into a variety of biofuels, including biodiesel, ethanol, hydrogen, and biogas. To add to the conversation, here are some pros and cons to algae as fuel:

PROS:

Algae grows in all directions
Single celled, no superstructure required for algae (roots, trunks, leaves)
Growth: 140 days for land crops; algae is year round, mature in 1-2 days
Algae weathers extreme conditions, is resistant to drought, wind, rain
Grow 30-100 x more oil per acre than corn or soybeans
No sulfur, non toxic, biodegradable
Can mix with existing fuels in existing vehicles
Can also produce bioplastics, medicine, nutrition, feed, fertilizer, more
Can absorb CO2 and other pollutants from power and cement plants, fossil fuel refining, fermentation based industries, ethanol production, etc

(Cons on next post!)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
haydengr
11:40 PM on 12/06/2011
If more billionaires shared the same morals and values as Sir Richard Branson, this world would be a better place. His intentions for the most part always seem to be of good nature.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BeasleysMom
Liberal Elitist
03:37 PM on 12/06/2011
How many of the low IQers among us know that Branson, one of the wealthiest men in the world through his own efforts, is a socialist, who lives and works in a socialist nation? While he was building his fortune he got nationalized health care and benefited  from nationalized banks and nationalized utilities plus various nationalized industries. The folks on the left keep saying that socialism is a bad thing. Hardly.
photo
FoxIslander
Fox Island...no relation to Fox News
02:38 PM on 12/06/2011
The right doent know what to think about this guy...they love him because he's a billionaire, but they hate his social and environmental consciousness.
02:19 PM on 12/06/2011
The only real option is to create "drop-in" fuels made from hydrocarbons, 4 carbon molecules to ethanol's 2, which is more similar to fossil fuels without the emissions. n-Butanol is probably the best of them, and it's where I'd put my money for the future. It has tons of industrial applications. Can be made from any cellulosic source. Problem is the technology and efficiency are not yet there. Needs to be gmo bacteria clotridium to create a more efficient breakdown of sugars to maximize yield. Current forms of bacteria will produce n-butanol, but will also reverse the process if batches are given too long, thus they are trying to genetically modify the bacteria clostridium and use certain enzymes to inject in a strain e-coli.
01:59 PM on 12/06/2011
the more i learn about biofuels, the more they look like snake oil...does anyone have a semi-objective resource that illustrates the pros/cons of them?

i'm all for a cleaner approach to energy, but i don't know if biofuel is the way to go.
02:26 PM on 12/06/2011
There really aren't many alternatives. If you use electric motor fleets, you have to power it somehow, that takes energy. Biomass to energy is actually a more efficient way to use it than ethanol production. You can create syngas, which can also be converted to biofuels, to power the power plants.

The main problem is that using corn based ethanol and other row crops that are "leaky" produce a lot of nitrogen gas in the soil, in the form of nitrous oxide, "laughing gas". N2O is far more "potent" as a greenhouse gas then CO2, up to 300 times worse, and lingers in the atmosphere longer.

Switching from monoculture row crops to cellulosic sources like switchgrass, which have a deep root system and are perennial, is a better option in the US. Corn stover (stalks) can also be used after harvest, but the food crops should remain for food.
02:47 PM on 12/06/2011
Thanks...i appreciate the insight!
01:22 PM on 12/06/2011
More of Branston's publicity puff, where do we grow the bio-crops, cut down more forest and grow them on the land or do we genetically engineer algae so efficient they'll choke our seas and oceans within a few years? So-called 'green' measures have cost us dearly, solar panels in the UK is about as stupid as you can get, in the desert solar panels rotate with the sun, on a house roof they don't, on a sunny day we could provide all our energy needs if we covered the whole of the UK and Ireland with solar panels. On a cloudy December day we could just about power Milton Keynes.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
I Think
01:07 PM on 12/06/2011
OOOPS make that efficiencies of scale
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
I Think
01:05 PM on 12/06/2011
Good for Branson, it is time that the business leaders got on the bio fuel wagon. We need to produce bio fuels for the airlines and for freight trucks, and we have the technology, so it is simply a matter of allocating the resources and developing inefficiencies of scale.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jeffhintx
Yummy gruel! Thanks 1 percent!
12:55 PM on 12/06/2011
ALGAE, I don't know how much simpler it can be said. The stuff eats CO2, poops diesel and can be grown in sunny areas. Nuff said.
Now get busy and scale that sucka up.
12:30 PM on 12/06/2011
Humans should invest heavily in research of Electro-magnatic-pulse-propultions
( UFO stuff ) .... it is abbundant and free to find and use
and no foot print whatsoever