Euro Crisis: Cameron Vetos Eurozone Agreement After Night Of 'Bad-Tempered' Talks With 'Merkozy'

Euro Crisis Cameron

The Huffington Post UK   First Posted: 09/12/11 09:28 Updated: 09/12/11 09:52

French President Nicolas Sarkozy hit out at David Cameron's "unacceptable" demands following a night of difficult talks in Brussels.

After clashing with eurozone leaders over exemptions for City of London banks and financial services, the prime minister pulled out of the talks over the future of the beleaguered currency.

Vetoing the treaty change, the prime minister told the press that it was not in Britain's interest "so I didn't sign up to it".

Sarkozy hit back, criticising Cameron's intransigence on the issue of the financial regulation for Britain's banks.

"We were not able to accept (the British demands) because we consider quite the contrary - that a very large and substantial amount of the problems we are facing around the world are a result of lack of regulation of financial services and therefore can't have a waiver for the United Kingdom," said the French leader.

Alongside Britain, Hungary Sweden and the Czech Republic look likely to demur.

According to The Telegraph, the "bad-tempered talks", which lasted for more than 10 hours, resulted in deadlock, with Sarkozy quipping that an agreement "wasn't possible, given the position of our British friends".

Speaking after the breakdown of talks, Cameron explained his reluctance to go along with the accord: "We want the eurozone countries to come together and solve their problems. But we should only allow that to happen within the EU treaties if there are proper protections for the single market, for other key British interests.

"Without those safeguards it is better not to have a treaty within a treaty, but have those countries make their arrangements separately.

"It was a tough decision but the right one," he said.

Following the collapse of negotiations, German Chancellor Angela Merkel backed a new deal for the core eurozone countries. "I have always said, the 17 states of the eurogroup have to regain credibility," she said. "And I believe with today's decisions this can and will be achieved."

Speaking earlier to a group of centre-right parties in Marseille, Sarkozy stepped up the rhetoric, warning that the risk of the disintegration of the eurozone had "never been greater", adding: "If we don’t reach a decision, we won't get a second chance."

Now it looks all but certain that the 17-nation eurozone countries, along with at least five nations outside the currency, will forge ahead with a separate "fiscal pact". Experts remain divided over the long-term economic consequences for the UK and the short-term political consequences for the coalition following the split.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK

French President Nicolas Sarkozy hit out at David Cameron's "unacceptable" demands following a night of difficult talks in Brussels. After clashing with eurozone leaders over exemptions for City o...
French President Nicolas Sarkozy hit out at David Cameron's "unacceptable" demands following a night of difficult talks in Brussels. After clashing with eurozone leaders over exemptions for City o...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 6
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
11:44 on 09/12/2011
Sarkozy is a lightweight on the international stage sespite his rhetoric. Its all very well and convenient to blame the whole Worlds ills purely on the financial sector but the fact is that the Eurozone was badly planned and implemented, and that had absolutely nothing to do with the UK.

The World wants the ECB to act as lender of last resort and ease the immediate problem, the Germans do not. So who is being intransigent here?
wolf2012
alive & well
15:40 on 09/12/2011
O la la .... someone having a very isolated view of the issue. The Euro crisis is nothing but the continuation of the 2008 crisis, when governments had to bail out their banks that were loaded with assets that lost their value virtually over night. Besides, Sweden, Czech, Hungary and Danmark have already signaled to agree to the treaty. That is altogether 26 out of 27 countries, leaving the UK isolated. What Europe wants is to separate the system relevant banks from investment banks and speculators which have ruined not only Europe's finances. Virtually the whole world except the USA and the UK agree on this. And the role of the ECB is not to bail out countries. This crisis needs regulation, regulation, regulation - otherwise all of us are going to be held hostage indefinitely. And concerning Sarkozy ... if he is a lightweight, what is Cameron, who ranks 5 levels lower? UK has always demanded special excemptions, and has gotten them in Europe for the most part in the last 30 years. That time is over. Europe certainly does not need the UK half as much as it needs Europe. Simple as that ...
16:02 on 09/12/2011
I completely agree with regulation. The issue here was about the EU going it alone on a financial transaction tax. The UK is not opposed to a financial tax as long as its observed globally not just the EU. I disagree on regulation the UK is working on separating high street banks between retail and investment banking to isolate risk.

The fact that 9 of the non Eurozone countries chose to go along with a new treaty is for them to decide, but I doubt very much they would have be in anyway near as badly affected by a go it alone Tobin tax. Thats for their electorate to debate and their decision.

The UK doesnt need Europe. It just needs to trade freely with Europe, and vice versa. Thats what the UK population voted for in 1975. If the EU doesnt need the UK then I dont understand what all the fuss is about.

The UK has paid its way in Europe I disagree on your comment there. There are many nations that have lined their pockets from Europe I dont believe we have.
11:33 on 09/12/2011
The proposed new treaty can stop FUTURE fiscal excesses. But, it does not provide what the financial markets demand: a firewall against the collapse in the Eurozone bond market resulting from PREVIOUS excesses, and CURRENT refinancing needs. The ECB could do that but refuses.
So, if not the ECB, what such firewall against near-term financial collapse have the EU leaders now proposed — and can their new proposals work?

In addition to the EFSF already in place (which is vastly underfunded for the job and seemingly unable to raise additional funds), the Eurozone leaders now propose speeding up the addition of the new ESM. But not until July! They also have proposed IMF intervention — but any such IMF intervention to aid rich Europe is likely to face strong political opposition outside the Eurozone and can therefore only be limited. Moreover, the IMF is ill-equipped for the sort of financial market intervention needed to prevent a run on bonds — the sort of intervention that would be simple for the ECB.

To make matters even worse, to finance these new ESM and IMF roles, the national banks of each Eurozone country are expected to produce the funds — 500b for the ESM and 150b for the IMF. But where are the banks supposed to come up with these funds since they cannot print Euros, and will have a hard enough time bailing out their local banks and private companies in the months ahead.
wolf2012
alive & well
15:48 on 09/12/2011
"The ECB could do that but refuses" ... this statement is completely wrong. The ECB does not even have the authority to do what is asked, so far it has only been tolerated. It's role is not to bail out countries. As a matter of fact, some even prepare cases for the EU court to make sure the ECB stays within it's legally defined roles. Bailing out countries is not one of them! "The markets" are nothing but financial interests. The question you should ask why countries like the USA and UK block any attempt to regulate separate "normal system relevant" banks from the investment banks and speculation business. That way, nobody would have to bail them out and as a matter of fact would (under that regulation) for the most part would have been wiped away by the current crisis. The regulation of these private institutionsis absolutely necessary. It should be their risk alone to invest and speculate! And exactly this is the European position, as well as of by far the most countries in the world, just not the UK and the USA.
11:24 on 10/12/2011
Then why is Merkel putting the pressure on the ECB,as for the UK,it is now law that the high flyers who run the banks are now answerable for any cock-ups they may make,as for Europe is this why they want a part of the UK financial market as it yields in tax approximately 55billion per annum and does cover 40% of trade in the EU.
It has taken time as for the bailing out of banks in the past but we are getting our act in order making the Officials who run the banks responsible for their actions,if only it could happen to the non-elected shower who run Europe.