General Sir David Richards: Economy Biggest Risk To UK

Army Tank

First Posted: 15/12/11 06:52 Updated: 15/12/11 07:43   PA

The biggest strategic risk facing the UK is economic rather than military, and the eurozone crisis is of "huge importance" to defence chiefs as well as City bosses, the head of the British armed forces has said.

General Sir David Richards, the Chief of the Defence Staff, said the country's main effort must be the economy, as "no country can defend itself if bankrupt".

In a lecture to the Royal United Services Institute in London last night Gen Richards said: "I am clear that the single biggest strategic risk facing the UK today is economic rather than military."

He continued: "Over time a thriving economy must be the central ingredient in any UK grand strategy. This is why the eurozone crisis is of such huge importance not just to the City of London but rightly to the whole country, and to military planners like me. The country's main effort must be the economy. No country can defend itself if bankrupt."

Gen Richards said the Strategic Defence and Security Review had "rebalanced" British defence and security for the next decade, and the decisions would still leave the country a "powerful relative to our allies".

He said all Western nations were changing their defence structures and argued Britain will still be a "front rank player" in the Nato alliance.

Gen Richards stressed the value of forming partnerships with other nations, saying that had been crucial to the successful operation in Libya. "Libya is not a template but one key lesson for us is this need for partners," he said. "Our alliances, formal and informal, established and new, will help shape our military actions over the next decade."

Commanders at all levels would have a duty to adopt tactics to "fit the kit we have rather than the kit we wished we had", he said.

"We need to combine realism with imagination. We must be content with the good enough and ensure training and relevant tactics make up for the exquisite technology we may have aspired to.

"It will require us to accept that some capabilities will be kept at lower readiness or sometimes provided by others. It will mean taking risk. But managing risk is ultimately what we do and none of us in the armed forces are discomforted by the challenge."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK POLITICS

The biggest strategic risk facing the UK is economic rather than military, and the eurozone crisis is of "huge importance" to defence chiefs as well as City bosses, the head of the British armed force...
The biggest strategic risk facing the UK is economic rather than military, and the eurozone crisis is of "huge importance" to defence chiefs as well as City bosses, the head of the British armed force...
Filed by Jacqueline Head  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 100
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
14:48 on 17/12/2011
Military expense needs to be scaled back. The cost of wars is too high in terms of people and treasure.
22:49 on 16/12/2011
The above photo is most apt. A WW2 american tank with a British gun, if I am not mistaken. Is that what CDS was really saying i.e. we will have to make do with what we have and cobble something together with any friends we can find, for the occasion? In the little history of warfare I know, that never seemed to work very well. The tragedy in it is the lives that will be lost.
20:47 on 16/12/2011
General Sir David Richards ,sir ,have`nt you heard General of all Dvid Cameron who has no Millitary background has deemed we are to scrap Harriers ,Nimrods AND WHEN HE SPEAKS the EU laughs
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
17:00 on 15/12/2011
General Sir David Richards should get some budgeting tips from the Taliban, after all they have just defeated the billion dollar budget NATO with 10 dollar Taliban in Afghanistan.
15:33 on 15/12/2011
General Richards mentions Libya, the Tornadoes, Elint (Electronic Intelligence) aircraft and the AWACS are all set to be scrapped over the next three years. He also says 'fit the kit we have rather than what we wished for'! The US marines have bought the Harriers, at a bargain price, they obviously have far sighted Generals in charge of their defence. A Roman general in the 2nd century said 'Let him who wants peace prepare for war.' A balanced defence force, buying properly costed and financially controlled equipment is necessary for the well being of any state. Politicians must decide, long term, what they want, the military should then say how much that the policy will cost and what equipment is needed, if we cannot afford that, then the policy must change, and the politicians and civil servants be made accountable. Of course the economy will dictate certain constraints, but history teaches us that poor defence costs us far more in the long run, and not just financially, but in human terms.
11:57 on 16/12/2011
The US marines have bought the Harriers,
--------------------------------
Over last couple of decades US marines have poured praise on their version of Harriers.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mokgee
Sabu.Satsang, Samsara, Solitude...
15:32 on 15/12/2011
Methinks it could be the picture, too revealing and truthful, it could upset the ethnic majorities, now that will never do hey.Anybody and everybody can kick us in the teeth, yet we are allowed to do nothing. Should this be the case, and they are the views of the majority, then once again, I don't think so....Great Britain, not Wimp Britain, thanks.......
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mokgee
Sabu.Satsang, Samsara, Solitude...
15:26 on 15/12/2011
It appears there is some kind of pecking order on this blog site. vetting is understandable, however for unknow reasons, mokgee, has his comments withheld, whilst many are duplicated very often. If my comments are too honest then do say so. I will cease to comment, Truth is essential for this country, most of the media organisations hide it for whatever reasons of fear and such like, I will have none of it..thanks
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:46 on 15/12/2011
From the picture above have the British Army started to buy old American Sherman tanks on Ebay. Buyer has to supply own 50 mm Machine gun. If the economy does collapse I guess the government will need the troops on the streets as part of martial law and to get us to pay the tax debt to the IMF and ECB banks.
11:48 on 15/12/2011
the EU is the problem...........
10:24 on 15/12/2011
I cannot believe a man in his position could make such at statement as he has done. The reason we are in the mess we are in is because of Europe. Countries unable to maintain their own finances are now being helped by us, yet those billions should be going to our Military our NHS and our Pensions to help our people not make others rich, mayb he forgets that were not all rich like himself.
10:49 on 15/12/2011
Quote: "The reason we are in the mess we are in is because of Europe"

So nothing to do with the meltdown in the financial services sector and the massive overspending by the last Labour government leaving the UK with the second highest budget deficit in the EU? Gordon Brown would be so happy to hear that!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Roy Fowler
I try....I really do!
10:12 on 15/12/2011
If we decided to pull out ALL our troops from Afghanistan and Iraq now; we would not only save lives but save BILLIONS of cash. Part of this money will keep and improve the Armed Forces themselves and the remainder can go towards looking after OUR countries weak and venerable this winter!!!
11:13 on 15/12/2011
Quote; "Part of this money will keep and improve [x, y, z]"

Why is that people believe that if money is saved in one area it will be spent in another? It won't. Any saving will reduce the budget deficit which will take years to eliminate before the UK even starts to repay it accumulated debt.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Roy Fowler
I try....I really do!
12:08 on 15/12/2011
I agree and understand your point 100%.

I was simply stating that the withdrawal of UK troops from our semingly endless foreign conflicts, could, allow a resdistribution of some of this cash into our hard pressed armed forces; amongst others.

But of course, its like paying Road tax for your car, not much of that payment actually goes towards maintaining and growing the Road network.
photo
rabidrightwatch
Green lefty & active environmentalist
11:52 on 15/12/2011
...point of accuracy Roy - we don't have any troops in Iraq...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Roy Fowler
I try....I really do!
12:01 on 15/12/2011
Happy to stand corrected........I was going to say soon to be in Iran (but maybe my crystal ball is getting a bit cloudy these days!)
09:58 on 15/12/2011
The defence problem in Great Britain has been getting worse since ww2, the first big mistake was building a tunnel joining us to France, mind you asylum seekers love it, during the Falklands war we had help from our American friends ( where were the French & Germans ) pretty similar in the gulf war, we are dumping ships left right and center and we tell the world we are doing it, what a sorry state of affairs.
This comment has been removed.
09:23 on 15/12/2011
One our of problems is that we are joined up to Europe via the Channel Tunnel. I must admit it is a good mode of transport, but a bit of a worry when, theoretically, we are not an Island any more.

I agree that we need our defence for our own country, not for everybody else's.

However, we do not want a military coup. Whatever anybody might say about Britain, our police do not go around brandishing guns, unlike other countries.

We now need to look out for ourselves - I believe others will follow now. Looking at the news last night there is unrest in other Eurosceptic countries. We don't want to be dictated to by the French and Germans. Entering the "Common Market" as it was originally called was a trading agreement not a dictatorship. Keep the flag flying David you are doing a grand job.
09:20 on 15/12/2011
I don't think that there is the slightest possibility of the UK being invaded in todays world. For one thing, it is an island and therefore has natural defenses.
No, the reason the general and others require the economy to recover (as well all do) is so that he and his cronies can carry on invading other countries and fighting illegal wars in other parts of the world. Who is next? Iran perhaps? I say cut the money the politicians are planning to spend on WMD's and the military spend the money on the economy.