Cable Says Vickers Report On Ring-Fencing The Banks Will Be Accepted By Government In Full

Cable

The Huffington Post UK   First Posted: 18/12/11 10:29 GMT Updated: 18/12/11 11:18 GMT

The Business Secretary Vince Cable has revealed that the government will tomorrow accept in full the recommendation to ring-fence Britain's banks. The Vickers Report on banking, published in September, called for strict firewalls between the retail and investment arms of banks to protect consumers. The plan is designeed to prevent another financial crisis similar to the one seen in 2007-2008 when banks had to be bailed out to avoid the entire financial system, including cash machines, shutting down.

Vince Cable told Andrew Marr on BBC One: "We can't have a position where the banks are too big to fail. We've accepted the recommendations of the commission."

The Chancellor George Osborne will make a statement to MPs on Monday afternoon, but Vince Cable told Marr that the attempts by the banking industry to lobby against the ring-fence had failed. "We're getting on with it," said Cable, saying a "common view" had been reached between the two ministers.

"We just cannot risk having a repetition of the financial catastrophe that we had three years ago," said Cable, who claimed the major structural reform of the banks was part of the Liberal Democrats' influence on the coalition agenda.

The Vickers report calls for a "high ring-fence" to separate the retail and investment arms of banks. Its recommendation was considered radical, even though it stopped short of calling for a full break-up of Britain's banks.

The report also calls for significant reforms to make it easier for customers to switch their current accounts between banks.

Speaking to HuffPost UK on Sunday morning, Angela Knight from the British Banking Association said: "Now we know where the government is setting the consultation, we need to work closely with the government and others to effect the right sort of outcomes for our customers."

Warning that if the ring-fence was wrongly applied then it would become difficult for the banks to lend to consumers and businesses, Ms. Knight added: "If ring-fencing and capital are set in wrong places, customers will have to pay more or go to non-UK banks, of which there are plenty. Getting the balance right is crucial."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK POLITICS

The Business Secretary Vince Cable has revealed that the government will tomorrow accept in full the recommendation to ring-fence Britain's banks. The Vickers Report on banking, published in Septembe...
The Business Secretary Vince Cable has revealed that the government will tomorrow accept in full the recommendation to ring-fence Britain's banks. The Vickers Report on banking, published in Septembe...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 16
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hmagbie
09:13 PM on 12/18/2011
Why aren't we doing this in the states?
09:12 PM on 12/18/2011
The Vickers so called “ring-fence” is a farce, if you look at the small print. It doesn’t really separate anything from anything else.

Deposits by and loans to retail customers are inside the so called “ring-fence”. As are deposits by and loans to what they call “Small and Medium size Enterprises”. See 2nd last paragraph p.11.

As to whether deposits by and loans to large corporations are in or outside the fence, Vickers & Co have not made up their mind! See lst paragraph of p.12. And their so called “final” report has been published, and the “Vickers commission” is now disbanded.

This is a shambles.
07:43 PM on 12/18/2011
Of course the power belongs in your hands.
If the powers that be, no longer represent you, then stop funding them.
TV licence, Council tax, car tax, income tax, VAT etc
(no one is suggesting you should be allowed anything for free, however if you are going to pay for something you should have a contract and your consent.)
We have a core belief system that most people believe it is the only system, for instance did you know that acts of parliament are not actually law, it's only given the force of law if you consent.
Parliament is operated like a company the politicians are the directors of the company and you are the employee of the company.
The Acts of Parliament are only enacted on the employees of the company, how did you become an employee of the company?
Your birth certificate which you had no choice your parents unwittingly signed you over to the company and when you come of age you are given a National Insurance number which is your employee number.
In other words you have never consented, you have never been asked.
This doesn't mean you don't want to pay your way, but it does mean that you have to give your consent.
There is common law, and is corporate law (Acts of Parliament)
of course under common law murder, theft, causing harm or loss to anyone else is unlawful.
Type into Google Roger Hayes, Brian Gerrish, John Harris
education is the key.
08:50 PM on 12/18/2011
Spot on as usual bertie. If only people knew how they were being scammed. As you rightly say, acts of Parliament are not 'lawful'.....on the spot fines are not 'lawful' and so on.

Just google the British Constitution Group, Lawful Rebellion and the The Peoples United Community to find out more. Also watch the videos from Roger Hayes on the 'Lawful Bank' which is being set up, I think you will all be shocked at how consecutive governments in cahoots with the bankers have stripped all our wealth from us.

CorshamCrusader
Deputy Editor of The British Resistance

http://www.thebritishresistance.co.uk/
05:57 PM on 12/18/2011
This " Ring Fencing" is not due to be implemented until 2019, when another government will have been elected, and can change its mind about this thought that Vince Cable has thrown into the ring!!!!!i What a waste of air! There is absolutely no point in bringing this up ! Does he think we are all stupid, and watch Strictly come dancing and X factor.??? Some of us have a brain (thank goodness)!!!
08:16 PM on 12/18/2011
Yep!!!!! Cleg and Cable think the british voters are stupid. They only had 20 % of polls so they lied on their manifesto to get more votes.Because they were never going to be in power they did not care what they promised. Remember at the next election vote lib dem to get a torry goverment
05:17 PM on 12/18/2011
Investment Banks in the main are not legitimate businesses as we would think of one..
They take people's money and gamble with it in the hope of making a profit and taking a slice for themselves.
As with every gamble for every winner there has to be a loser and no wealth is created,it is only redistributed.amongst the stakeholders....for a fee of course.
It is unsustainable as a business model and that's why it collapsed in 2007 and will again.
Ironically if you went to a bank for a loan to start a business using this model you would be met with a flat refusal.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
minimemo
Can I be your friend...if they let me out...
08:03 PM on 12/18/2011
The reason it collapsed is they were using peoples money who had never authorised the use of their money! The money being used originally used to just be the money of those who chose to invest and thus gamble. Labour removed the regulations that kept ordinary peoples money safe and the investment banks plundered the man on the street's accounts to gamble.
04:51 PM on 12/18/2011
I don't care what restrictions are put on banks just get them to pay back all of their debts, and get donkey brain Osbourne to make Virgin pay the proper price for NR as well, selling assets is all the Conservatives have ever done, apart from closing industries, business's and shops down that is
05:06 PM on 12/18/2011
Glad you mentioned Virgin. They have walked off with more taxpayer's money than any other large corporation I know of. Richard Branson has had a lot of help from the British taxpayer for his very nice lifestyle.
04:22 PM on 12/18/2011
Agree that there should be a ring fence between retail and investment banking operations. But in the case of Lloyds TSB it was my understanding that the Government told Lloyds TSB that Halifax and BoS were problem free and there the Governments auditors had just confirmed this. As a result LloydsTSB accept the Governments say so without having due diligence done. We all know what happened after that millions had to be written off because BoS was techinically bankrupt and bankers in general got slated becausde of Government bail outs.
Why didnt the Government aka Gordon Brown get taken to task for destroying the finances and reputation of such a long standing Bank.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paul Wagland
Resistance is fertile
04:01 PM on 12/18/2011
And that, fellow readers, is the sound of a door slamming in an empty stable.
02:42 PM on 12/18/2011
Quote -- " The Vickers Report on banking, published in September, called for strict firewalls between the retail and investment arms of banks to protect consumers. The plan is designeed to prevent another financial crisis similar to the one seen in 2007-2008 when banks had to be bailed out to avoid the entire financial system, including cash machines, shutting down."
---------------------------------------------
What is taking so long...... We saw what happened in 2007-8.

It is time to separate retail and investment arms of banks.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jesuswasademocrat
01:03 PM on 12/18/2011
"Vince Cable told Marr that the attempts by the banking industry to lobby against the ring-fence had failed."

How lovely for England that their legislative bodies can still put the country before powerful interests.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:42 PM on 12/18/2011
Believe it once you actually see it happening.
11:58 AM on 12/18/2011
old vinnie promising again,heardit all before you old duffer