Nigel Farage: It Was Wrong To Launch Tirade Against Herman Van Rompuy (VIDEO)

Nigel Farage Eu

Huffington Post UK   First Posted: 19/12/11 12:17 GMT Updated: 19/12/11 12:33 GMT

Nigel Farage has admitted it was wrong to accuse European Parliament president Herman Van Rompuy of having "the charisma of a damp rag and the appearance of a low-grade bank clerk", nearly two years after he first made the remarks.

In a broadside at Rompuy he said it was his intention to be the "quiet assassin" of European democracy and called Belgium a "non-country".

"Who voted for you?... We don't know you, we don't want you and the sooner you're put out to grass the better," he said in February 2010.

But the Ukip leader has finally taken back his words telling the Guardian that his tone was "wrong" and he had "apologised to bank clerks the world over".

"In parliaments all over the world you get real confrontation. But the European parliament is not designed for that, because we're not politicians; we're technocrats."

Farage also said his party's anti-European position could end up "forcing David Cameron into giving us a referendum" and he would consider an electoral pact with the Conservatives.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK POLITICS

Nigel Farage has admitted it was wrong to accuse European Parliament president Herman Van Rompuy of having "the charisma of a damp rag and the appearance of a low-grade bank clerk", nearly two years a...
Nigel Farage has admitted it was wrong to accuse European Parliament president Herman Van Rompuy of having "the charisma of a damp rag and the appearance of a low-grade bank clerk", nearly two years a...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
10:05 AM on 12/21/2011
Did you read the article or just the headline, or are you devoid of an irony button? Just wondering.

He takes back his words? Not really, he maintains his apologies to bank clerks. Yes maybe the tone was a touch strident, but not the content of his comments as is clear if you read the article.

As to a pact with the Tories, go and read it again and tell me if that is what you see there.