Daniel Radcliffe On Acting Doubts, Leaving Harry Potter Behind, And What Lights His Fire

The Huffington Post UK   First Posted: 20/12/11 11:58 GMT Updated: 20/12/11 12:23 GMT

Harry Potter actor Daniel Radcliffe says he's most motivated by the doubt of others.

In an exclusive interview with this month's EMPIRE Magazine, Radcliffe who has spent most of 2011 in the Big Apple, starring in the Broadway revival of comedic musical How To Succeed In Business Without Really Trying, says: "I'm very motivated by the doubt of others. Whenever I hear people talk about the Potter kids as if we're not going to be able to make it out of the series... That really lights a fire under me."

Radcliffe also says he doesn't think the acting profession comes naturally to him - something that has sometimes been evident, particularly in the early Potter pictures.

"It's only recently that I have become more aware of the problems people had with me in the films," he says, tentatively.

"And, you know, people are obviously entitled to their opinions. The way I come at everything is a place of subtlety and underplaying. In fact, if I'm guilty of certain things particularly - and I am in the sixth Potter movie, definitely! - it's of underplaying almost the entire film!"

He laughs. "But we learn from our mistakes. You know, I'm at the age most actors would be when they've learned from their mistakes in private and done drama school for three years. It's a double-edged sword - I had the amazing privilege of working with these fantastic actors for ten years and learning from them, but I also had - we all did - the slight curse of somebody seeing, basically, our acting exercises!"

He added: "Sometimes I really feel like I'm getting the hang of it, because I never really had a process. My process was mainly that I hit my marks and I said my lines. So I'm kind of trying to find a process that allows me to find a surefire way into a character, if it doesn't come easily. I'm working on that. And there are some days when I feel like, 'Yeah, God, I'm actually learning something! This is great!' and there are some days when I go, 'Oh my God, I'm never going to feel good at this. I'm never going to feel like I'm not a fraud."

Radcliffe plays Arthur Kipps in the eagerly anticipated film adaptaion of Susan Hill's unsettling novel The Woman In Black.

Speaking about the film's central theme - that of death, Radcliffe reveals it's a topic he has long had a curious interest in.

"I'm going to make myself sound very odd now," he says. "But when I was younger, about 14 or 15, there was a period of about six months where the last thing I did every night before I went to bed was read through the entire 'Last Words' section of the Book Of Quotations.

"I had a kind of fascination with death... I've lost a couple of friends and one relative - my grandmother, on my dad's side."

He pauses.

"Nothing that I've felt comes close to what it feels like, I imagine, for a young man to lose his wife. But I have a pretty active imagination..."

The hardest sequence of the film for Radcliffe was not the physical endurance test but the emotional one, when Kipps is left alone in the haunted house, facing one very malevolent Missus.

"The emotional stuff is the trickiest, absolutely," he says. "And that's why I feel I made some strides in this film because actually, for the first time, I felt able to really allow my own emotions to come out through the character. I know it sounds bizarre to say this now, but it was a fairly new experience for me, for whatever reason. I think I had a sense of it on the last Potter, but not before then."

Radcliffe is looking forward, hopefully, to playing a contemporary, non-fantastical character in 2012 and has "two very, very exciting films possibly happening... but it's 'welcome to the world of independent movies' now for me, so it's that thing of they may all happen and none of them may. I just want to keep working with interesting people and hopefully build up as diverse and varied a body of work as I can.

"When I look at Gary Oldman's career, that's what I look at and go, 'Oh my God! That's amazing!' The versatility and range shown there... And, you know, I believe I'm capable of that."

The February issue of EMPIRE magazine is on sale now.
SLIDESHOW: The final Harry Potter film in photos...

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK ENTERTAINMENT

Harry Potter actor Daniel Radcliffe says he's most motivated by the doubt of others. In an exclusive interview with this month's EMPIRE Magazine, Radcliffe who has spent most of 2011 in the Big Ap...
Harry Potter actor Daniel Radcliffe says he's most motivated by the doubt of others. In an exclusive interview with this month's EMPIRE Magazine, Radcliffe who has spent most of 2011 in the Big Ap...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 14
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
12:05 PM on 12/26/2011
i am one of the people that criticised his acting in the early films (i know its harsh as he was only young), i think i was always trying to find the negatives in harry potter as i always preferred lord of the rings. But as the series went on you could see Daniel Radcliffe maturing as an actor whilst the films themselves matured, it didnt take long for me to change my opinion of him and the movies and hopefully the only way is up for his career
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:06 PM on 12/25/2011
The lad's done his best, the films are enjoyable and he's made a good living. Nothing to feel bad about is there? I think Rupert Grint is far and away the best of the HP kids, and who ever plays Neville Longbottom is probably the worst, but they were only kids, so lets not be mean to them, eh?
04:00 AM on 12/23/2011
hey daniel radcliffe -

my guess is that some of what you're feeling might have its roots in the fact that you were privileged/cursed to have a central role in something frightfully larger than you: the high-budget treatment of a masterpiece and a cultural phenomenon, replete with A-list, phenomenally talented actors playing supporting roles to your title character. it would be reasonable to feel that you have, to some degree, ridden into superstardom on the coattails of others.

on the other hand, the word on the street is that you have done a respectable job - even in the early stuff. you carried the role with credibility – not once but repeatedly. this means, at least to me, that you entered into something waaaaayyyyy over your head, rose to the challenge, and owned it.

don't feel too bad about yourself mr. radcliffe. you appear to be earning your keep.
11:57 AM on 12/22/2011
I can only view nasty comments from others as simply jealousy at Daniel's early success. He played potter convincingly, particularly in the last film. He was lucky enough to work with some of the most supreme actors of our time such as Dame Maggie and Alan Rickman and he has acknowledged that. The acting profession is one that involves a lot of luck, he has been one of those people who through his connections has been lucky. There are many people on our screens that have varying degrees of 'talent', but the reason why they are successful is probably the thing that makes bitter jealousy surface. I personally find Rupert Grint to be the most talented of the three main child characters, but the whole ensemble did a good job in the films. It is not their fault the director chose to ignore some of the more significant and interesting aspects of the books and put in his own insignificant offereings to waste time.
07:10 AM on 12/21/2011
Why do people make comments that are so darn rude to others there really is no need for it
07:03 PM on 12/20/2011
Now that's the first time I had heard an actor say that he scuks at acting. Daniel if you are reading this I think that you are an AMAZING actor and sofar I had not missed a singel move you made. You are an AMAZING actor and I hope that you never stop acting as long as there is a fan like me in the world.:)
05:43 PM on 12/20/2011
You are a parent? Ifeel deeply sorry for your children having such a prat as a father and surprise that any woman couuld go with such a pompous git.
07:02 PM on 12/20/2011
That not nice how woul you feel if some one said that to you! And any ways he's NOT married so you cant way that!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jlab
Looks like it's another snark week.
02:31 PM on 12/20/2011
Well, young Mr. Potter, there's underplaying it ... and then, there's not playing at all. After doing that in those super-successful movies for all those years, you might enjoy giving it a shot in the privacy of your home.
04:35 PM on 12/20/2011
After his stage successes in Equus and How to Succeed In Business Without Really Trying, I think he's established his acting credentials. I assume you saw the need to be a pillock and leapt at it. Perhaps next time have a shot at it in the privacy of your own head.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jlab
Looks like it's another snark week.
05:09 PM on 12/20/2011
Very clever. I am a parent. I've sat through at least five of those pretentious movies, I've seen this hapless, likeable guy try to become a passable actor... and fail. I've earned my right to sling some harmless internet snark at an international celebrity.

You, however, should probably ask yourself what your motivation is for your response. Are you a very sensitive magic person? I'm so sorry to have hurt your fee-fees.