Medical Records To Be Accessed Online, Under Government-Backed Proposals

Computer

First Posted: 23/12/11 15:33 GMT Updated: 23/12/11 15:33 GMT   PA

Patients are to be given access to their medical records online under government-backed proposals, it emerged today.

The NHS Future Forum, which is advising the Government on its health reforms, said people should be able to download their medical history and view prescription and appointment details free, the Times reported.

Medical test results and hospital discharge notes would also be available under the scheme and patients would be able to obtain repeat prescriptions.

The group of doctors who make up the forum reportedly said the plans could be introduced in England within three years.

Health Minister Lord Howe said: "We fully support NHS patients having online access to their personal GP records.

"Our vision for a modern NHS is to give patients more information and control over their health.

"That's why the independent NHS Future Forum have continued to listen specifically on this issue and how we make it a reality for patients."

Under the scheme, patients will be able to point out mistakes in their records or request a second opinion from their GP, it was reported.

Patients can currently ask their GP for access to their records, but must explain their reasons for doing so.

The proposals could face opposition from GPs who may object to patients having unrestricted access to potentially sensitive information.

There are also likely to be concerns about the implementation of the scheme following the long-delayed attempt to upgrade NHS electronic medical records.

The Patients Association said the initiative would help people who are having difficulty persuading medical professionals to allow them access to their records, but stressed that patient confidentiality is paramount.

Katherine Murphy, its chief executive, told the Times: "There must be a guarantee that all patient data will be protected and that it will not be possible to trace back information to an individual."

Health Secretary Andrew Lansley said the Government was committed to the scheme in principle.

"I don't think the issue is whether we want to do it, it is simply how we go about doing it," he told BBC Radio 4's The World At One.

"We think patients should feel in the NHS that it is a case of 'No decision about me without me'.

"That means you have really got to have access to information and be able to participate fully in your care."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK POLITICS

Patients are to be given access to their medical records online under government-backed proposals, it emerged today. The NHS Future Forum, which is advising the Government on its health reforms, sa...
Patients are to be given access to their medical records online under government-backed proposals, it emerged today. The NHS Future Forum, which is advising the Government on its health reforms, sa...
Filed by Dina Rickman  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 6
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
11:37 PM on 12/24/2011
The way this is worded it looks like only selective parts of our medical records will be available .
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Steve LeRoy Moore
03:03 PM on 12/24/2011
It would certainly cut down on the cost of our health care system. I recently went to have a simple surgery at a outpatient clinic center. Each dept. in the center is ran as a independent business. Take your blood, fill out a form and show insurance card, get a ekg, fill out a form and show your insurance card, get a x-ray, fill out a form and show your insurance form, etc. Of course in each dept. there was a long wait. I was there day there for something that should have taken a couple of hours. It's amazing in this era of fast communicating tech., the medical industry is still in the dark ages, which drives our ever increasing costs.
07:55 AM on 12/24/2011
NO NO NO - yet another IT project that will cost more than the value it brings and an opportunity for our informatin to be hacked, lost and confused!
08:41 PM on 12/23/2011
My partner and I feel 'About time too.' It is ridiculous that people cannot easily access their own medical records. It could actually be safer if this information is readily available - anytime, anywhere - e.g. so that if you are in another part of the country, or abroad, you can easily show your records if you fall ill. It also means that people can check the information that is kept about them. My partner has an ongoing condition and a huge bundle of tatty paper records and sometimes mistakes can creep in. Recently he was taken on to a hospital ward and we heard the escorting nurse deliver some devastatingly wrong information to the ward sister. We tried to check his records to see what they actually said, and the sister was most annoyed - didn't we realise that the information about my partner - information about his own body - was 'confidential' - we had to go through the proper channels to find out what the records said (which can take weeks) - or go without. She seemed far more concerned about confidentiality than about possible errors - glad to see that this madness is finally going to end!
04:18 PM on 12/23/2011
Some practices already have part of this up and running. I am able to book my appointments and order repeat prescriptions via the EMIS system.

The sign on is complicated (three layer) and if you get it wrong you are locked out.

I beleive this is the system they are going to use ultimately and from what I have seen I do not have a concern (128bit SSL, part my password part surgery random generated password, so secure
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
killerbee256
06:05 PM on 12/23/2011
I don't think the issue is hacking so much as potential employers and insurance companies using the data. They could easy use there influence to with government to get legal access to these records. Look what happened to social security numbers, originally they were only supposed to be used for social security.