Margaret Thatcher Iron Lady Archives: Jimmy Carter Trident Deal Made Despite Opposition From Cabinet (PICTURES)

Margaret Thatcher Iron Lady

First Posted: 30/12/11 06:18 GMT Updated: 30/12/11 06:18 GMT   PA

Two-thirds of the cabinet in Margaret Thatcher's Conservative government opposed her decision to buy the Trident nuclear deterrent, according to official documents made public.

In 1980, Mrs Thatcher struck a deal with US President Jimmy Carter for Britain to buy the Trident submarine-launched missile system to Britain to replace the UK's ageing Polaris deterrent.

The following year, however, she was forced unexpectedly to reopen the agreement after Mr Carter's successor, Ronald Reagan, opted for the more expensive Trident II variant - leaving Britain to either follow suit or be left with an out-dated system.

Files released by the National Archives show defence secretary John Nott warned Mrs Thatcher that they would have to "deal with all the issues" surrounding the acquisition in the teeth of strong opposition from within the Tory ranks.

"It was essential to do so since two-thirds of the party and two-thirds of the Cabinet were opposed to the procurement of Trident," Mr Nott told her. "Even the chiefs of staff were not unanimous."

Although Mr Nott warned that the cost of the programme looked set to double - from £5 billion to £10 billion - he decision to press ahead received strong backing from the foreign secretary, Lord Carrington.

If Britain did not get Trident, France would be left as the only nuclear power in Europe. "This would be intolerable," he said.

However Mr Nott's concerns were echoed by trade secretary John Biffen who said the decision to go ahead with Trident could be seen as cutting the resources available for conventional forces at time when the military was already over-stretched.
"In such circumstances anti-nuclear sentiment will go much wider than in the 1950s and, in the circumstances, could be electorally harmful," he said.

Such views may have accounted for Mrs Thatcher's decision to avoid a full Cabinet discussion before the original decision to acquire Trident was announced by Mr Nott's predecessor, Francis Pym, in July 1980.

A note from the cabinet secretary Sir Robin Armstrong explained a cabinet discussion had be planned until a last-minute warning from the White House that The New York Times was about to break the story, including details of Mrs Thatcher's correspondence with Mr Carter.

"After consulting a few colleagues (who took the view that bringing forward the announcement by 48 hours would be the best way out of a difficult situation) you agreed that the timetable should be advanced by 48 hours," he wrote.

Sir Robin acknowledged nothing had actually appeared in the newspaper, but insisted the reporter concerned was "very angry at having been forestalled" by the decision to bring forward the announcement.

Was Margaret Thatcher good for Britain? Leave a comment below
Flick through a slideshow of the Thatcher years:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK POLITICS

Two-thirds of the cabinet in Margaret Thatcher's Conservative government opposed her decision to buy the Trident nuclear deterrent, according to official documents made public. In 1980, Mrs Thatche...
Two-thirds of the cabinet in Margaret Thatcher's Conservative government opposed her decision to buy the Trident nuclear deterrent, according to official documents made public. In 1980, Mrs Thatche...
Filed by Stephen Hull  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 3
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
08:32 AM on 12/30/2011
well, in today's situation, having nuclear power is a must.
It is crazy for Gadaffi to dismantle his nuclear program... and so he ended up having nothing to fight with against the West.
Wonder why Iran and North Korea are not invaded by America? Because they have NUKES!
12:12 PM on 12/30/2011
Actually, it was quite fortunate that Tony Blair was able to convince Gadaffi to relinquish is country's attempts to acquire WMD or he would have quickly put down the rebels. Iran does not have a nuclear weapon yet, but it is closer to having the ability to build one. And nuclear power is one thing, having a credible nuclear deterrence is another.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:21 PM on 12/30/2011
Pauline,

Rational explanations have no place in the geo-political ambitions of major powers.