Almost 1,000 Police Officers Have Criminal Records, Including Senior Detectives

Police

First Posted: 02/01/12 10:10 Updated: 02/01/12 21:29   PA

More than 900 serving police officers and community support officers have a criminal record, official figures show.

Forces across England and Wales employ policemen and women with convictions including burglary, causing death by careless driving, robbery, supplying drugs, domestic violence, forgery and perverting the course of justice.

Those with criminal records include senior officers, among them two detective chief inspectors and one chief inspector working for the Metropolitan Police.

At least 944 currently serving officers and police community support officers (PCSOs) have a conviction, according to figures released by 33 of the 43 forces in England and Wales in response to Freedom of Information requests.

FULL LIST OF CONVICTIONS, BY POLICE FORCE

Many forces could not provide details of criminal records dating from before their staff joined the police, meaning the true figure will be significantly higher.

The Metropolitan Police, Britain's largest force, came top with 356 officers and 41 PCSOs with convictions.

It was followed by Kent Police (49), Devon and Cornwall Police (44), Essex Police (42), South Yorkshire Police (35), Hampshire Police (31) and West Midlands Police (27), although not all the figures are directly comparable.

The criminal records include:
  • Devon and Cornwall Police - a Pc convicted of burglary as a teenager
  • Essex Police - one inspector convicted of dangerous driving; another inspector convicted of possessing and supplying cannabis; a detective constable convicted of robbery; a Pc convicted of data protection breaches for viewing intelligence records relating to friends, relatives or other people living in the local area, and a special constable convicted of stealing a set of car number plates, putting them on another vehicle and obtaining petrol without paying
  • Hertfordshire Police - a sergeant convicted of dangerous driving
  • Kent Police - a Pc convicted of perverting the course of justice in 1998
  • Merseyside Police - five officers convicted of assault and one convicted of causing death by careless driving
  • Norfolk Police - a Pc convicted of causing death by careless driving
  • North Wales Police - an officer convicted of forgery
  • Staffordshire Police - an inspector convicted of assault causing actual bodily harm and a Pc convicted of keeping a dangerous dog
  • Surrey Police - a detective constable convicted of obstructing police officers; a Pc convicted of wounding; a Pc convicted of drink driving in 1988 and resisting arrest a decade later, and a Pc convicted of animal suffering in 2006

Most of the convictions are for traffic offences such as speeding and drink-driving, but the records also include a South Yorkshire Police officer convicted of fishing without a licence.

Home Office guidelines issued in 2003 say police officers should have "proven integrity" because they are vulnerable to pressure from criminals to reveal information.

The guidance says forces should reject potential recruits with convictions for serious offences - including causing actual bodily harm, burglary, dangerous driving and supplying drugs - unless there are "exceptionally compelling circumstances".

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK

More than 900 serving police officers and community support officers have a criminal record, official figures show. Forces across England and Wales employ policemen and women with convictions inclu...
More than 900 serving police officers and community support officers have a criminal record, official figures show. Forces across England and Wales employ policemen and women with convictions inclu...
Filed by Stephen Hull  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 155
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
21:33 on 12/01/2012
Never trust a police officer. I have seen for myself how they disregard the law and do what they want to do. I have seen the Officer Smellie get cleared by a court of assaulting a young lady. He slapped her in the face and then hit her on the leg with a baton. All captured on video clear to anyone watching it that nothing the officer did could be considered legal. The court took the side of the police. Why? Both the Court and the Police belong to the same club. The "Crown".

For this reason Officer Smellie was told his actions of slapping a defenceless woman across the face and hitting her with a weapon was lawful. Where was the justice? Why bother having a court system and going after criminals if someone in a police uniform can get away with crime?
09:38 on 03/01/2012
when you are young you are bullied into pleading guilty when you are older its just the cheapeast option to plead guilty
09:13 on 03/01/2012
An armed police officer investigating a case involving some some government dealings gets out of his depth it results in him having to phone to phone a newspaper to negociate a safe place so he can turn him self in with a solicitor ,because the police released story that he was unstable and a manhunt was underway because he was armed and could be dangerous ,well he may have lost his job at least he came out alive . trust the police i dont think so !
08:58 on 03/01/2012
bloke gets stopped by the police for driving a car with accident damage in the rear he has tax insurance and an mot he explains that he had an accident the day before,the attending officer says get the exaust fixed and lets it go ,2 weeks later the driver gets a summons ,the short one is it goes to court the driver remembers the officers number,but its a different number on the list the officer takes the oath and proceeds to give his account the driver tells the judge that he was not the officer in attendance and the judge had to ask the officer 3 times before he admitted he was not ,did he get done for perjury false evidence wasting court time no he did not ,the case got thrown out of court . i know this i was that driver !
KenInd
We too shall get through this.....
08:35 on 03/01/2012
Three quick observations:

-every case will have different circumstances, and must be viewed that way.

-it does not mean the rest have never committed a crime. They just haven't been prosecuted and convicted.

-"it takes one to know one' - a reformed cat burglar knows how to catch a new cat burglar.
05:47 on 03/01/2012
Not so concerned with the one that committed an offence when they were a teenager but some of these offences - How can they possibly be kept on in the Police Force. They would be dismissed from the Health Service with some of these convictions as not being able to be trusted.
KenInd
We too shall get through this.....
08:37 on 03/01/2012
Union pressure? Or a culture of 'protect each other' cronyism? Just a guess.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:07 on 03/01/2012
I'm not so concerned about police officers having a criminal record as it's a poor indicator of risk but i am concerned about the cosy relationship between police officers and the courts, chiefly the magistrates.

The collusive relationship that exists between the solicitors, magistrates and police officers damages the whole concept of the rule of law and is a cancer that will eventually lead to the death of civil liberties in this country and commits untold damage onto many communities in the UK.

I'd rather have a police officer that had a criminal record yet was conducting himself professionally and honestly than an officer without one, who was behaving criminally.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:10 on 03/01/2012
Opps ...

As an addendum I think the nature of the conviction of an officer would matter, such as one for perjury.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kritikos
Intelligence is not a science
02:58 on 03/01/2012
Dayum.
02:36 on 03/01/2012
there must be some truth to the tv series american dexter where hes a serial killer, the politicans are a bunch of thieves with their expenses del boy dave cameron and ed sillliband are as bad as each other. i am not suprised they have criminal records i applied to work in a care home once i had to
go for a crb check guess what took several months luckily i am clear, they even crb checked my husband several years after working for a labour local authority as he worked in a library they did it on the quiet i only knew when the crb came through clear
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Vapula
Failure is not an option
00:29 on 03/01/2012
Always knew the Police was the last refuge for criminals who wanted work.
23:32 on 02/01/2012
Apart from an idiot! Who would want to send out a message that a criminal record is OK? It's a necessary qualificat­ion to be in respectabl­e job & to uphold the law!
No wonder the youngsters have got such mixed messages! & there's problems!
Reality always bites!
00:03 on 03/01/2012
Hear! Hear!
00:18 on 03/01/2012
The law is an *ss!
23:11 on 02/01/2012
Now we know why all that property has been "removed" from Police stations! It was an inside job after all.
23:00 on 02/01/2012
Stats given by the Public Sector are usually not truthful - fixed in their favour! These stats are probably the tip of the iceberg!
21:59 on 02/01/2012
It takes a criminal to find one arent we all lucky they know what they are doing or is this the reson we are not allowed to defend our property with FULL VIGOUR as we may injure a police man in the execution of his criminal activities.
21:52 on 02/01/2012
Just show's the corruption that goes on & bending! Also in other Public Services & Government
Trust none of them!