Labour Calls For More Support for Women Over Breast Implants

Breast Implants

First Posted: 03/01/12 08:38 GMT Updated: 03/01/12 08:38 GMT   PA

Private cosmetic surgery firms have a duty to support women with faulty breast implants, Labour said today.

Shadow health secretary Andy Burnham called on companies to honour their responsibilities and offer help to patients who have gone under the knife.

His demand came amid fears for 40,000 British women who are thought to have received silicone implants made by Poly Implant Prothese (PIP).

The French authorities shut down PIP last year after the company was found to be using cheaper industrial silicone. Officials in Paris recommended women have the prosthetics removed because of fears they could rupture.

But the UK's Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) said the risk of rupture is only 1% and that removal is unnecessary.

Health secretary Andrew Lansley launched a review of the risks from faulty breast implants after receiving new evidence from major cosmetic surgery firm Transform.

Mr Burnham said that private firms should fund consultations for women who want to see a doctor and discuss their options.

He added: "The industry should meet that cost.

"You get the distinct impression here we are dealing with an industry that's good at the sales pitch and taking the money up front, but less good at the after-care and facing up to responsibilities when things go wrong."

He accused the industry of "evading responsibilities" and told the BBC Radio 4 Today programme: "I would ensure that people who have had a problem, where there has been evidence of rupture, that they get immediate corrective surgery paid for by the private cosmetic surgery industry.

"It's just not acceptable to hear they have refused to do that."

A top surgeon yesterday called for all women who have the implants to have them removed because of the "uncertainty and lack of knowledge".

Tim Goodacre, president of the British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons and a member of the government-commissioned panel investigating the scandal, said: "Even with a very low rupture rate, we would want to see most implants removed on a staged basis.

"If you believe a device is faulty, I think this would be true in your car or any other object that you buy, you would want to have that replaced on a staged basis."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK

Private cosmetic surgery firms have a duty to support women with faulty breast implants, Labour said today. Shadow health secretary Andy Burnham called on companies to honour their responsibilities...
Private cosmetic surgery firms have a duty to support women with faulty breast implants, Labour said today. Shadow health secretary Andy Burnham called on companies to honour their responsibilities...
Filed by David Hobbs  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 28
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
08:05 AM on 01/04/2012
NHS should only treat patients, who recieved NHS operations, As for the others you found the money to get the job done So find the money to have it done correctly. its not something you really needed to have done Vanity comes at a price in general they look awfull anyway
02:42 AM on 01/04/2012
They could approach a No Win No Fee company of lawer's. There are enough of these vultures about. They might take the case.
Southern law girl
Researching my viewpoint....
11:15 PM on 01/03/2012
When making a decision to have such foreign bodies placed into ones body, surely most sensible people would understand there are risks involved. Everyone knows about foreign bodies and rejection, quite apart from the actual 'thing' going technically wrong. I don't really believe the taxpayer should have to foot the bill, because it was those individuals informed choice, and if they were not furnished with the pros and cons they should take action against the clinics; most of the cosmetic surgery would have been done by private clinics. Moreover, those private clincs should now be made to address their negligence and compensate, after all, they purchased the 'thing' in the first place. There is always the scenario of the clinic itself going out of business, then it is a matter of the individual finding the funds themselves, they found the funds to have the cosmetic work done, but obviously providing the surgery was done for cosmetic reasons and not rebuilding due to cancer. In the case of genuine reasons, an entirely different matter.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TAXPAYER12
09:28 PM on 01/03/2012
The NHS should only remove implants at the tax payers cost, IF those implants were placed for MEDICAL reasons. All the others should pay for the removal of implants, out of their own pockets. As I said previously, It's a French product, sue the French.
09:21 PM on 01/03/2012
The Labour and the Government should be worried about the Elderly, the state off this country now about people wanting to make themself look better. Get your priorites right Government. We Need More Jobs for the English Born people. We Need lower taxes lower VAT and the government to stop Utilies companies having HUGE Profits when we are all strugglying to paid our electricity and gas bills. Also Housing Associations seems to find it easy putting up rents not caring if their paying tennants can afford the huge increases every year. And by the way thats again down to the Labour Government. So NO WE TAX PAYERS SHOULD NOT PAY FOR THE REMOVEAL OFF BREAST IMPLANTS.
08:34 PM on 01/03/2012
Why should the tax payer pick up the bill for implant removal. If you go and stick foreign objects in your body expect problems - you paid for it to be put in, you pay for it to get taken out!!
07:28 PM on 01/03/2012
If your new car breaks you take it back to the garage you bought it from, sorry ladies self inflicted, sue the clinics that put them in the nhs is over burdened
05:21 PM on 01/03/2012
Those who recommended and fitted these implants whether NHS or private clinic, should pay for their removal - not just the NHS/taxpayer. Trust Labour to climb on the band wagon, but Burnham is right, the cosmetic surgery clinics should pay up.
05:53 PM on 01/03/2012
That is what is being proposed- the company that produced the defective implant should pay for their removal/replacement...not the NHS.
03:38 PM on 01/03/2012
If those who had implants for a valid, medical reason now wish to have them removed, then I see no problem.
If silly women had implants, purely for reasons of vanity, then they should pay to have them removed. Although I doubt if they'll bother. If they didn't mind having foreign bodies inserted then, why would they mind now?
05:56 PM on 01/03/2012
Er no, those women were sold a defective product, the company that produced the implants must pay for their removal/replacement.
03:34 PM on 01/03/2012
If Andy Burnham wants more support for women, tell them to get a stronger bra.
photo
rabidrightwatch
Green lefty & active environmentalist
03:07 PM on 01/03/2012
Difficult one this...

Many women have had breast augmentation procedures following NHS operations, so there may be a valid reason for assisting them.

However, those carried out for cosmetic and/or vanity, the overwhelming number of which were carried out privately, should be referred to the clinic which implanted them in the first place.

This is a misrepresentation case if ever I heard one, and should be corrected promptly at no additional expense by the offending clinic.
After all, they are clinically responsible for the welfare of their patients and as such should be morally obligated to correct their potentially dangerous mistake.

For those unfortunate women whose clinics have gone into liquidation, then of course the NHS should assist wherever possible.
10:45 PM on 01/03/2012
NO the NHS shouldn't pay for anything regarding these implants,No No No.
02:24 PM on 01/03/2012
Apart from women who may have had transplants after mastectomy, any who chose this procedure from misguided vanity should at least pay half and be treated in the private sector.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
meddleman
01:47 PM on 01/03/2012
Yet another example of the wonders of private medical care! Let's have more of this in all areas of medicine. Great idea Dave.
01:40 PM on 01/03/2012
They can afford to have them put in so unless the clinic pays, let them pay to have them out. This is not an NHS issue neither foir that matter is tattoo removal.
01:32 PM on 01/03/2012
Und wo landet das jetzt hier?
photo
rabidrightwatch
Green lefty & active environmentalist
02:57 PM on 01/03/2012
Das wissen Wir alle nicht.
06:44 PM on 01/03/2012
what??