IVF Babies From Frozen Embryos 'Healthier And Heavier' Claim Experts

Frozen Embryo Babies Healthier

The Huffington Post UK   First Posted: 6/01/2012 04:03 Updated: 6/01/2012 07:55

IVF babies born from frozen embryos are heavier and healthier than those born from fresh embryos, new fertility research has discovered.

The research by the Centre for Reproductive and Genetic Health found that frozen embryos are bigger and have better health as a result of longer pregnancies, giving the foetus more time to grow into a healthy birth weight than fresh embryos, which were born on average 0.65 weeks earlier.

The findings, presented at the British Fertility Society Annual Meeting in Leeds, involved measuring the weight and length of gestation of 384 single babies born after a fresh embryo transfer and 108 born from frozen embryos.

Researchers discovered that babies born from a frozen embryo through IVF were on average, 253g heavier than those born from fresh. They also found that the proportion of low birth weight babies (weighing less than 2.5g) was also lower in the frozen group (3.7% compared to 10.7% for babies born from fresh embryos).

“For all assisted reproduction technologies, it is important that we ensure the procedures promote optimal health in the resulting children throughout their lives,” says lead researcher, Suzanne Cawood, deputy head of embryology at the Centre for Reproductive and Genetic Health.

“Our study suggests that babies born from frozen embryos have a significantly longer gestation period and are significantly heavier at birth compared to babies from fresh embryos.

“This is important because prematurity and low birth weight are both risk factors for poorer health later in life and are linked to higher rates of behavioural and learning difficulties.

“This means that resulting babies may potentially be healthier if frozen embryos are transferred rather than fresh embryos.

“The reasons behind these findings are not yet fully understood, but one possibility may be that there is a difference in the uterine environment between fresh cycles, when embryos are transferred soon after the eggs have been collected, compared to frozen cycles when the uterus has not been stimulated in the days before transfer.

“However, further research is needed to test this hypothesis,” Cawood added.

The recent findings follow a Danish study in 2008, which found that babies born from a frozen embryo had higher birth weights than those born from fresh embryos. Danish researchers suggested that this was because only top quality embryos survive the cryopreservation process of being frozen as well as the thawing process before IVF.

Researchers hope that these positive findings will cut the number of multiple pregnancies from IVF as it supports the move of transferring a single embryo at a time.

“These initial findings, if proved accurate following further research, will give the medical profession more evidence to encourage patients to accept single embryo transfer, which reduces the risks of multiple births to both mother and babies,” says Clare Lewis-Jones, chief executive of the Infertility Network.

“Single embryo transfer gives the best possible outcome - a healthy singleton baby - with the chance of further frozen embryo transfers in the future. If these results prove positive, then we would welcome this and hope it benefits infertile couples everywhere.”

In the UK, over 45,264 women have IVF treatment, according to the Human Fertilisation & Embryo Authority (HFEA). These women go on to have 57,652 cycles between them resulting in 12,714 babies being born.

“If IVF babies born from a frozen embryo are heavier and pregnancies last longer, communication between the mother and midwife is key,” says independent antenatal teacher and doula, Janine Rudin from Birth Basics.

“Parents need good information and support from their medical team as well as good antenatal education to help them feel more confident about birthing a bigger baby and knowing what is to be expected and considered normal for them.”

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK LIFESTYLE

IVF babies born from frozen embryos are heavier and healthier than those born from fresh embryos, new fertility research has discovered. The research by the Centre for Reproductive and Genetic Hea...
IVF babies born from frozen embryos are heavier and healthier than those born from fresh embryos, new fertility research has discovered. The research by the Centre for Reproductive and Genetic Hea...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 11
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
01:55 PM on 01/06/2012
I've often wondered if IVF babies have the same fertility isses as their parents, so is this just snowballing a population who are unable to give birth? I don't see this as a bad thing however, as overpopulation is the most pressing concern we as a species should be worried about.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ppenguinator
Life's too imprtant to be taken seriously.
10:10 PM on 01/06/2012
That's a very interesting question.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cynic123
01:40 PM on 01/06/2012
What a load of rubbish. If you have sex them loads of spurm runs out. With ivf it all goes in and with no dribble. A woman told me once that is why she had ivf because it was not messy, (her words)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SATCHMAN99
02:01 PM on 01/06/2012
You don't know a lot about IVF then!! They fertilise the egg out side the body then place it back.
10:29 AM on 01/06/2012
Sounds absolutly disgusting relating babies to "fresh" and "frozen". What about all the healthy babies that are aborted every year? These are the babies that need looking after and protected, but there goes another money making scheme with the result of dead children. The amount of babies lost through IVF is more than the ones who make it. Lets start promoting adoption, much better method of having children and much safer for mum and baby!
11:17 AM on 01/06/2012
you make it sound as if it is easy to adopt, it isn't!! And people who for whatever reason abort their healthy babies will have already been advised about carrying the child to term and putting them up for adoption and have obviously chosen not to. It isn't a crime to want to have a child of your own and for some people IVF is the only option. Yes, a lot of embryos don't survive the process but a high number of natural prgnancies result in miscarriage which is just as heartbreaking. I agree the costs are too high and a lot of it is money making but most people are not eligable for nhs funding. I wasn't because we had custody of my partners two children. People should not be critisised for following their heart.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SATCHMAN99
12:55 PM on 01/06/2012
Lets make adoption easier then. My son is 12 years old and was from a frozen transfer. He is 5ft 5 and wears size 7 shoes. Says it all I think LOL!! The IVF was a lot easier than the adoption proccess that we started and finished when a parentless social worker started to ge too intrusive into our lives an dtryed to tell us what makes a good parent!! Yeah right ..who is educating who on the subject!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kehlan Sutai Inigan
08:59 AM on 01/06/2012
a misleading and biased article. the HFEA are only in this to make money out of peoples desperation to be parents. The fact that a frozen embryo baby is slightly larger than fresh, does not magically mean the treatment will work. Usually two embryos are implanted due to low success rates. The HFEA want to make it only one embryo... why? Well if you look at the figures it speaks for itself. 57,652 cycles, resulting in 12,714 babies. thats (without a calculator) approximately a 20% success rate. Each of those attempts costs the parents thousands and the HFEA gain a substantial fee from each attempt. Go to single embryo implantation and you'll lower the rates even further, meaning even more futile attempts by families desperate to conceive and even moer money int he pocket of the HFEA... way to go, its nothing to do with health, youer just getting rich out of us.
10:29 AM on 01/06/2012
This is true!!!!
02:32 AM on 04/24/2012
Well, of course you have to wonder about motives of making money, but I wouldn't say transfering only one embryo has nothing to do with health. I'm going though this process myself, and my husband and I have decided to tranfer only one embryo at a time (my clinic's standard recommendation is two), because of the increased risks associated with multiple gestation. I'm sure there are plenty of people in this business for the money, but there are others who genuinely want to help people build families. It's very important to visit several fertility clinics and get a feel for the people there, because it can make all the difference.