NASUWT Rejects Teachers' Pension Deal Proposed By Government

Nasuwt

Huffington Post UK   First Posted: 06/01/12 14:09 GMT Updated: 06/01/12 17:24 GMT

One of the UK's largest teaching unions has rejected the government's proposals for the reform of the teachers' pension scheme.

The National Association of Schoolmasters Union of Women Teachers (NASUWT) met to consider the offer made by the Department for Education (DfE), which was presented to teacher unions on 20 December last year. The national executive of the NASUWT "unanimously" endorsed the stance previously taken by the union's negotiators not to sign up to the government's "Heads of Agreement".

The decision comes after thousands of teachers downed their tools on 30 November in protest of the pension proposals.

Chris Keates, general secretary of the NASUWT accused the DfE of wasting "valuable time" and described the consultation process as a "debacle".

"[The DfE] failed to provide the necessary information on which meaningful discussions could take place and presented some potential changes which did not have Treasury approval.

"Unions were pressurised and threatened to sign up to a document when a final draft was not even available. Even when a document was produced as the final meeting was breaking up, the wording was changed unilaterally by the DfE overnight."

Keates said it would have been "completely irresponsible" for the union to sign up to the Heads of Agreement under the circumstances.

"These are critical issues which have profound implications for teachers, for the profession and for the education service."

Keates added she would be writing to Michael Gove requesting he meets with the union as a "matter of urgency".

A Department for Education spokesman said it was "disappointing": "The deal we set out before Christmas is a fair one for teachers and affordable for taxpayers. It means that teachers will still get a far better pension than the vast majority of people in this country - while we can keep long-term costs firmly under control.

"It's disappointing the NUT and NASUWT restated their position on last month's deal. We've already addressed many of teachers' concerns, particularly around early retirement. We are now ready to have detailed, technical discussions to reach a final settlement - but have made clear that the broad deal on the table is as good as it gets. Other unions have given a far more positive response and will be consulting with their executives later this month.

"Reforms to public sector pensions are essential - the status quo has never been an option. The cost to the taxpayer of teacher pensions is already forecast to double from £5 billion in 2006 to £10 billion in 2016 and will carry on rising rapidly as life expectancy continues to improve."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK UNIVERSITIES & EDUCATION

One of the UK's largest teaching unions has rejected the government's proposals for the reform of the teachers' pension scheme. The National Association of Schoolmasters Union of Women Teachers (NA...
One of the UK's largest teaching unions has rejected the government's proposals for the reform of the teachers' pension scheme. The National Association of Schoolmasters Union of Women Teachers (NA...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 21
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
03:01 PM on 01/07/2012
If they go on strike, make them reapply for their jobs with the same kind of hours and holidays that everyone else gets..
10:18 PM on 01/06/2012
The Government would have credibility in their argument if they actually invested the contributions Public Sector make to be paid out at a later date. What they are doing is using the extra money they want to collect to pay off the deficit create by the bankers. They have been clever in creating the public v private sector argument as cover but all this really proves is that the disgraceful provision of pensions in the private sector is now seen as the way forward.
The Government also completely misses the point that it is actually cheaper to pay a pension to a worker at aged 60 than have to pay their salary for an extra 6 or 7 years because they are forced to retire later. The danger is that public sector workers will simply opt out of the Government pension scheme and end up claiming state benefits in retirement just as many low paid private sector workers have to. This is a short term way of raising capital to pay for the mistakes of the City. The private sector should not forget it was their employers who opted not to contribute to pension funds when the stock market falsely inflated their value. When the market crashed the huge pension fund deficits caused the closure of most final salary schemes in the private sector. It is hypocritical of the private sector leadership to call for cuts in public sector pensions when they have let their own workers down so badly.
12:55 PM on 01/07/2012
Well Said!

You have stated so many facts that the public are not aware of and if the government has their way, they will try to make private hate public so that the real facts are disguised.
photo
Reality always bites
Sometimes just a bit peckish
10:38 PM on 01/10/2012
Diane Abbotts 'Divide and rule' principle appears to be alive and well. Just working against the proletariats!
06:08 PM on 01/06/2012
The unions are really quite good at saying that the government is wasting time by not..., yet they agree, and then disagree. It is clear that the issues are not the benefits, but politics. No matter what a non-labour government proposes, it is unacceptable. Even when a former Labour minister states that there is no better plan available, the unions refuse to listen. They want a government which they control, one that owes its existance to the unions, one that is bought and paid by unions. If this same offer was present by Ed Balls' people, the unions would jump at it.
photo
Reality always bites
Sometimes just a bit peckish
10:43 PM on 01/10/2012
Not really- Any changes to existing terms and conditions must be challenged. When you sign a contract it is' or should be legally binding on both sides. Amendments that are made to counteract profligacy by the previous government are unacceptable to any union or individual.
If you had paid fifteen years into a pension scheme and then been told your benefits from that scheme were to be reduced would you be happy?
05:47 PM on 01/06/2012
My son's school is very hot on attendance rates. It would be 100% if not for his teachers ensuring he missed a days education.

Sadly the Unions are leading there members astray. It was only last year that the Unions in Southampton (Conservative Council) went on strike because of pay cuts across the board of 2-5% but.no jobs lost mind you. in some northern Labour led councils 1000's of jobs were axed. Not a strike in sight.
photo
Reality always bites
Sometimes just a bit peckish
10:47 PM on 01/10/2012
Oh do think 'within the box' If the teachers were on strike your beloved son will still get his attendance recorded. Can you or your breadwinner afford a 5% reduction in your income and not challenge that? If there have been no job losses in the Southampton area then you are fortunate in your location. Can you please give some statistics regarding 'Northern led council job cuts'
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nathan0316
TrueBlueTory Age quod agis
04:59 PM on 01/06/2012
It is difficult to feel empathy for teachers when the pensions you recieve are better than anything on offer in the private sector. Yes, you do a hard job, yes, you don't recieve the level of respect that perhaps you should and yes, you are in a position of enormous responsibility but the simple truth is the money has run out. This is not about screwing you, or dis-respecting you or feeling sorry for you. The money has run out. You must realise that, you're not stupid, you can't fail to understand the basic problem at hand. Sorry, but the money has run out.
05:32 PM on 01/06/2012
Why blame the Teachers for the cowardice of the private sector in not fighting for decent pensions?
10:24 PM on 01/06/2012
You are missing the point of the Hutton Report. Public Sector pensions are affordable and would be self funding if the Government actually invested or saved the contributions made by it employees instead of using them to pay down the deficit. This is yet another tax to pay for the deficit created by the Tories rich friends. It is the same as the huge amount of taxes paid by the motorist that are not used to improve our transport system but to fund Government spending on the deficit. To think otherwise is to simply fall for Clegg's public v private sector argument introduced as cover for these cuts
photo
Reality always bites
Sometimes just a bit peckish
10:51 PM on 01/10/2012
Your comment makes a lot of sense. The drawback is that you blame the Tories (Rich friends) for the cuts when you are fully aware that 13 years of a labour government took millions from public and private sector pension funds and left the mess for others try and manage.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stevesheff
03:13 PM on 01/06/2012
I'm a teacher and I took part in last year's strike, more out of solidarity than a belief that anything could be achieved. It's only a matter of time before the unions back down. In the short term, it's in the interests of employers to have these one-day strikes They save a day's pay and the teachers sit at home doing the work (such as marking) that they would have done anyway but not getting paid for it. As we get nearer the time for pupils' exams, the unions will back down as they always do.
03:43 PM on 01/06/2012
then get your backsides into gear have some bottle and strike properly, sod the country its done nothing for the majority.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stevesheff
04:09 PM on 01/06/2012
Teachers have consciences and I doubt if the general public would support us, especially parents whose child care arrangements fell part and the 'A' 'Level students who need their grades to get into university. Politicians would capitalise on this and turn public opinion against us.