Pensions: Unite Local Authority Workers Reject Government's Final Offer

Pensions

First Posted: 09/01/12 17:30 Updated: 09/01/12 17:30   PA

The government's hopes of resolving the bitter dispute over public sector pensions received a fresh blow today when leaders of tens of thousands of council workers rejected a final offer.

Unite's national local authority committee turned down the proposed deal, saying "genuine discussions" should be held without "arbitrary" deadlines.

The move follows a similar decision last week by the union's health executive and a decision by the British Medical Association to survey around 130,000 doctors and medical students on the offer, raising the prospect of their first industrial action ballot for more than 30 years.

The two biggest teaching unions also refused to sign up to the deal as they pressed for more talks.

Unite general secretary Len McCluskey said: "Unite's local authority representatives have lost trust after (communities and local government Secretary) Eric Pickles let the government's real agenda out of the bag.

"The security of our members in retirement is just too important to leave any space for doubt or mistrust, so the union's senior representatives in local government have rejected the government's proposals.

"Our senior representatives believe they have no choice but to reject the 'principles document' after Eric Pickles claimed the unions had made commitments which have not been fully discussed.

"There now needs to be genuine discussions without arbitrary deadlines. Our members need clarity before we can move forward."

Unite said a row before Christmas over a letter from Mr Pickles, raising the issue of an employer cost-ceiling on pension contributions, had caused a "crisis" of confidence and trust.

Leaders of the biggest public sector union, Unison, will meet tomorrow to consider the final offer, while unions will hold talks at the TUC later this week to decide their next move.

Up to two million workers went on strike in November in protest at planned changes to their pensions and some union leaders have warned of more industrial action if the row remains unresolved.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK POLITICS

The government's hopes of resolving the bitter dispute over public sector pensions received a fresh blow today when leaders of tens of thousands of council workers rejected a final offer. Unite's n...
The government's hopes of resolving the bitter dispute over public sector pensions received a fresh blow today when leaders of tens of thousands of council workers rejected a final offer. Unite's n...
Filed by Dina Rickman  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 7
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
18:28 on 10/01/2012
Why can't the BBC (or if it won't, Sky or Channel 4) once and for all produce an informative and objective summary of the whole saga of public sector pensions - their true cost, their unsustainability {short of a mass revolt by the taxpayer} and their comparison to a private sector scheme. Explain why most, if not all, such private sector schemes have been closed, and how public sector schemes can 'magically' avoid the massive deficits that those remaining private schemes are now facing? How are they immune from world stock markets, investments, and annuities that are being decimated around us? Get the best independent research commissioned to highlight the facts of pension life to union leaders, and the best interrogators to publicly challenge (I nearly said ridicule) their paltry arguments - Paxman, Humphreys, Snow et al. It would be a true public service. Also, challenge the Government as to how/why they can justify granting improved service-based factors for the public sector, given these facts. The only way the public sector pensions can be financed is via taxation - that's people with no or little pension exorbitantly funding those who have already got gold-plated ones!
21:44 on 09/01/2012
go for it folks you've nothing to lose and whatever the press publishes don't believe it, theres 50 million backing you up.
21:31 on 09/01/2012
Would be easier now to let people retire earlier rather than later, to create jobs, and contribute into the tax system
23:10 on 09/01/2012
now there's a thought, perhaps if everyone was self sustaining in retirement and didn't require a pension.
21:30 on 09/01/2012
One in the eye for sStephen Sakur, who tried bullying mark serwotka on hard talk the other night,i n saying that he was alone in his stance, !!!
19:22 on 09/01/2012
Another Government fiasco. They want to change existing contracts which were signed and sealed by both parties, Government and workers.

There should be no surprises that the workers reject this as it is asking them to accept less without compensation for time already served.

Either pay compensation for the remainder of the contract now or, more pragmatically, honour existing contracts and close the scheme to new entrants.

It's not rocket science.
photo
Reality always bites
Sometimes just a bit peckish
19:15 on 09/01/2012
I am so annoyed about this I would want to take a top gear presenter outside and shoot him in front of his family!