Iran Nuclear Crisis: US Decries 'Further Escalation' After UN Reveals 'Impregnable' Underground Enrichment Plant

Pa12388411

Huffington Post UK   First Posted: 10/01/12 09:08 GMT Updated: 10/01/12 10:05 GMT

Iran's enrichment of nuclear material at an underground facility represents a "further escalation" of its violation of UN resolutions, the United States has said.

Tehran is believed to be enriching uranium at its northern 'Fordo' site, which is built deep into a mountain and is thought to be virtually impossible to bomb.

The bunker is located around 90 miles from Tehran, and was first discovered by western intelligence in 2006.

On Monday the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) confirmed that Iran had begun enriching nuclear material at the site.

"The IAEA can confirm that Iran has started the production of uranium enriched up to 20 percent ... in the Fordo Fuel Enrichment Plant," an IAEA spokeswoman said in a statement.

"All nuclear material in the facility remains under the Agency's containment and surveillance."

In response US state department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland demanded Tehran comply with UN Security Council resolutions.

"We call on Iran once again to suspend enrichment activities, co-operate fully with the IAEA and immediately comply with all UN Security Council and IAEA board of governors resolutions," she said.

British Foreign Secretary WIlliam Hague also condemned Iran's "provocative act which further undermines Iran's claims that its programme is entirely civilian in nature", while France threatened "measures of an intensity and severity without precedent".

Above: The Fordo enrichment site.

Iran says that its nuclear enrichment programme is peaceful, and claims that its enriched uranium will be used to treat cancer.

Tensions have been heightened with Iran since the European Union said it would impose a ban on oil exports, and the US said it would impose financial sanctions on the country's central bank.

Since that announcement the Iranian currency has fallen to record lows, and Iran has threatened to close the crucial Strait of Hormuz - a move the US said would cross a "red line".

Meanwhile an Iranian court sentenced a man to death after he was accused of spying for the CIA.

The Iranian-American man and former marine, Amir Mirzai Hekmati, reportedly confessed to the plot against Iran's secret services. The US has demanded his release.

Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, also raised tensions in western governments when he said on Monday that Tehran would not accept the new raft of sanctions.

"The firm decision of the Islamic republic is to resist the pressures" of Western governments, Khamenei said.

"While the Iranian people have travelled the road to success and see the signs of new victories to come, the oppressor is trying to frighten the Iranian people."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK

Iran's enrichment of nuclear material at an underground facility represents a "further escalation" of its violation of UN resolutions, the United States has said. Tehran is believed to be enriching...
Iran's enrichment of nuclear material at an underground facility represents a "further escalation" of its violation of UN resolutions, the United States has said. Tehran is believed to be enriching...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 68
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
Djay0252
America needs to Bless God
05:39 PM on 01/11/2012
How many UN resolutions has Israel violated?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:42 AM on 01/12/2012
DJ,

And how many resolutions has the US vetoed? Given that they joined are the hip, that's an awful lot of vetoes and violations (not to mention alliteration).
04:24 PM on 01/11/2012
Anti US comments are being censored from Huffington Post. Several of my posts have been deleted because they do not take the 'war with Iran' at any cost point of view.
12:31 PM on 01/11/2012
I read that another nuclear, scientist has died in Tehran, spontanious combustion I hear. My sympathies go out to his family but none to the people who had him work on Iran's nuclear missile programme.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:52 PM on 01/11/2012
And spontanious (sic) combustion is what you'd believe.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wannabefree
Nation & People First
07:03 AM on 01/11/2012
Republicans blame social security and medicare for our problems, but willing to spend bliilions of dollars in Iraq for our lifetime , like what Perry said to send more troops to Iraq. Someone needed to say enough is enough, end the war and get out of Iraq.. Bigger the hole you dig(Bush and Cheney) more time and soil you need to fill it(Obama). You know something, all the contracts from Iraq went to China, where we shed our blood and money (Of course Halliburton made profits from there) and our companies did not get nothing, not even oil. Bush did not know the oil price anyway.
Whatever Obama does is going to be wrong as far as far as selfish republicans are concerned. After all, for them he would be a Muslim, if he had extended friendly terms, or they would claim that Obama made USA an enemy of Iran.if he put sanctions, If starts a war then repubs would shout that he started a useless war, if not then they would shout that he is a chicken
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:40 AM on 01/11/2012
"comply with all UN Security Council...resolutions". In other words, do as we (the US) say, not as we do.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:49 AM on 01/11/2012
yea bc the UN kowtows at everything the US wants... but not really... as far as having nuclear arms, there is a reason why Iran is on the no-no list.. but you guys keep opening your borders to them, hey hows your Embassy doing in Iran by the way? oohh too soon?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:02 AM on 01/11/2012
How's it going in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan?
12:55 PM on 01/11/2012
No...read it properly it is; comply with UN (not US) resolutions. I don't know where you have been for all your life or what some misguided people have been telling you but I will point out to you and other such like minded people, this obvious but forgetten or not appreciated topic these days...... WITHOUT THE USA WE WOULD ALL BE SPEAKING GERMAN OR RUSSIAN NOW, IF WE WERE HERE THAT IS. Now go away, pick up a recent history book, one that is based on accuracy not propoganda and enjoy a good, honest, factual read.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:14 PM on 01/11/2012
Your comprehension is as appalling as your grammar and worse than your illegibility (if English is not your first language, I apologise). Now run along, and don't be impudent.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Vapula
Failure is not an option
06:05 AM on 01/11/2012
The west has done it's level best to provoke Iran. Now they have gotten their wish. There is no question of going to war against Iran; there has been an ongoing war against that country for a number of years. Accusing Iran of escalation when the US and it's lackeys tighten sanctions on Iran is j laughable. The escalation is coming from the US. Even if Iran were to get a nuclear weapon why is the US so sure it would use it when it would mean the total destruction of that country? North Korea has the bomb but hasn't used it. In any case I am not satisfied that all this talk of Iran producing a nuclear weapon is not just propaganda invented to justify the murdering of hundreds of thousands of Iranians as was the case in Iraq.
12:42 PM on 01/11/2012
What a load of bull you espouse, imagine that you are an israeli living in their sourthern town with missiles constanly raining down on them. Now imagine that those missiles could be nuclear and you were charged with the defence of the israeli people. Just what would you do? Your Iranian sypmathies are very curious. The whole free world is out of step, not poor Iran? Grow up and stop reading/listening to the mad mullah's propaganda. Also 'gotten' is such a poor, lazy expression to use and is not proper english. My ladyfriend in Maryland used to use it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:44 PM on 01/11/2012
Anti-US warmongering and its hypocrisy does not imply support for Iran. Similarly, anti-Zionism is not the same as anti-Semitic.

Does your ladyfriend (sic) in Maryland refer to you as her gentlemanfriend in Disneyland?
11:20 PM on 01/10/2012
When the war with Iraq was started it was also claimed that the oil price
would decline as a result of the war. Even though it was that the oil price would
rise, which it did. The same foul promises are likely to be included in case of
a war with Iran.
Looking back to 2003 when Murdoch said that:
.... the price of oil would be one of the war's main benefits. "The greatest thing to come
out of this for the world economy, if you could put it that way, would be $20 a barrel for
oil. That's bigger than any tax cut in any country."
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2003/feb/12/uk.iraqandthemedia
09:36 PM on 01/10/2012
just one more steep towards another American war... another illegal war
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Matthew Harrold
Huzzah!
05:44 PM on 01/10/2012
The problem as I see it is that due to the WMD claims that led up to the Iraq war, it's hard to take anything that Washington says on face value. It's blatantly obvious that the U.S is gearing up for physical strikes against Iran, especially with the pressure of Israel threatening to do so if the U.S doesn't. So the question is how trust worthy is American intelligence? Well seeming both the Iraq and Vietnam were both started based on lies, I would say the answer is "Not very".
photo
bellsblu2
Unrepentant Liberal living on the edge
06:41 PM on 01/10/2012
If you are referring to the agenda driven intelligence of the Bush administration (Geez, I mentioned intelligence and Bush in the same sentence.... -slaps forehead-), that sort of non-leadership is over and done for the foreseeable future.
April22
Some experiences in life are ineffable
08:16 PM on 01/10/2012
How can you be so sure?!
09:22 PM on 01/10/2012
"...that sort of non-leadership..." so Obama has done that much better than Bush? *slaps forehead*
01:01 PM on 01/11/2012
I think the US is doing what most other EU countries are doing...keeping an open mind and their options that are available to use, at readiness for any irresponsible actions the mad Iranian leadership may take. The US would not attack Iran without cause. Israel might but who amongst us would want to be an israeli living under the constant threat of a unilateral strike by Iran or it's sattelites?
04:53 PM on 01/10/2012
I found this blog post on another site. A conflicting opinion on the benefits of a Nuclear Weapon Free Zone in the Middle East. He makes some interesting points:

NWFZs are a nice sounding idea, if one believes there is a plausible path to "Global Zero." There is not.
even if we were to somehow eventually get rid of all nuclear weapons, the knowledge will exist to create them again, which will mean than any crisis could have the potential to reignite a nuclear race, except, that the winner of the new races will be the first to acquire weapons and threaten unacceptable damage on those that have forsaken them.

That view is actually put forward in crystalline form by none other than Thomas Schelling, a major name in game theory and strategic thought. I quote him below on this issue,

" 'a world without nuclear weapons' would be a world in which the United States, Russia, Israel, China, and half a dozen or a dozen other countries would have hair-trigger mobilization plans to rebuild nuclear weapons and mobilize or commandeer delivery systems...

The urge to preempt would dominate; whoever gets the first few weapons will coerce or preempt. It would be a nervous world."

"Global Zero" is a mirage. We should start thinking about dterrence in a potentially multipolar world, not fixing our gaze on something that will not happen and even if it did, won't fundamentally solve the security dilema anyway.
04:40 PM on 01/10/2012
No sane person wants Iran to develop nuclear weapons; or anyone. One obvious way to mitigate or eliminate this threat is to establish a nuclear weapons-free zone (NWFZ) in the Middle East. The issue arose (again) at the NPT conference at United Nations headquarters in early May 2010. Egypt, as chair of the 118 nations of the Non-Aligned Movement, proposed that the conference back a plan calling for the start of negotiations in 2011 on a Middle East NWFZ, as had been agreed by the West, including the US, at the 1995 review conference on the NPT.

Washington still formally agrees, but insists that Israel be exempted. 'not the right time', Hillary Clinton stated at the NPT;Washington insisted that no proposal accepted that calls for Israel's nuclear program to be placed under the auspices of the IAEA or that calls on signers of the NPT, to release information about "nuclear facilities and activities.." Obama's technique of evasion is to adopt Israel's position that any such proposal must be conditional on a comprehensive peace settlement, which the US can delay indefinitely, as it has been doing for 35 years, with rare and temporary exceptions.

The UK & US (and UN) agreed that the NWFZ will be implemented under Resolution 687 that suprisingly, calls for the establishment of a NWFZ in the Middle East.

If you agree with this it may be worth visiting the UK Governments E-petition website - see http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/24727
10:37 PM on 01/10/2012
"No sane person wants Iran to develop nuclear weapons"..... no sane person wanted Israel to have nuclear weapons.. but that has not stopped Israel holding such weapons over the heads of all the countries around them.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:46 AM on 01/11/2012
The petition closed on 5 December; it had 1 signature.
03:04 PM on 01/10/2012
It's time to ratchet up the pressure on this load of women hating, women beaters and executers of innocent men, women and children. The population is cowed into carrying out the leardship's doctrine and are too afraid to ask questions or protest. This was how it was in Germany under the dictatorship of Hitler. Money and jealousy of the west's way of life is what motivates the misinformed in Iran and their supreme will to blow Israel, USA and GB to bits. The law allows first strike if threatened. It will not be long in coming. The mad mullahs have made no secret of their wish to close the straits of Hormuz. This they say is in reply to the threat by the eu and everyone else, except the chinese and russians of course, to put an embargo on Iranian oil exports. This retalliation has nothing to do with the oil sanctions but everything to do with keeping their nuclear sites as far away from attack by submarine launched missiles or surface launched airstrikes. They are the bullies of the middle east and want no part of compromise or talk or inspection of their atomic facilities by UN inspectors. No one in their right minds can expect anything else of Iran except to develop the long range, nuclear missile, with enough reach to hit Italy or France and possibly UK.
This comment has been removed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paul Wagland
Resistance is fertile
04:55 PM on 01/10/2012
Bombs and sanctions didn't end the Cold War, Levi Strauss jeans and hamburgers did. To change what we don't like about their culture, we should be showing how ours is better. Then it's up to them. Use of force will be counter-productive.

Iran can't be classified as bullies, in the last three centuries they have only taken up arms when invaded.
10:04 PM on 01/10/2012
What a thought, win people over with trade instead of drone attacks.
02:43 PM on 01/10/2012
Lets hope that this isnt another "Weapons Of Mass Destruction" saga, im sure we had enough of that when our Tony was in charge of the country, they found loads of sand and nothing else, but in saying that i have an Iranian friend and he wants us to attack Iran, ive seen all the smuggled out phone and cam- corders videos where demonstations are brutally put down, and yes the youngsters in Iran do want democracy, I never realised Iran wes such beautiful country, i hope one day it opens up and becomes a major holiday resort, im sure many people from the western world would go.
02:23 PM on 01/10/2012
If they did get a weapon,there not dumb enough to us it.It's all talk
02:44 PM on 01/10/2012
I don't know if you already had an earlier reply to your comment Warren or the watchers removed it but it went along the lines of they (Iranian leadership) are not dumb but are straight of the book of 'how to hate the west' book of fanatical loonies. If the enriched uranium was to be used for cancer treatment alone, then why bury or hide it in an impregnable site. As I have said before, they cannot wait to develope the 'bomb' and use it on Israel and the west via their bunch of proxy suicide bombers that they have trained.
03:08 PM on 01/10/2012
If it is for such malicious purposes why is the nuclear material allowed to be under IAEA surveillance
03:31 PM on 01/10/2012
I don't really don't know how small you can make a nuclear bomb,that a suicide bomber could use.But I think they would be fools to attack Israel that has a good delivery system in place. And the ball's to use it.
01:30 PM on 01/10/2012
It would be fantastic if the whole world became one nation and one people. So we could tell Iran president to get lost.
02:34 PM on 01/10/2012
dream dream dream.
09:37 PM on 01/10/2012
YEAH! Then we can all be part of a NEW WORLD ORDER! Then the whole world can be fascist. And the .01% at the top can rule the 99.99% with an Iron Fist and we can have 0% freedom to try and form a Sovereign Nation. "Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely."