MPs Expenses: £3.5m Of Claims Published By IPSA

Parliament

PA/The Huffington Post UK   First Posted: 12/01/12 11:29 GMT Updated: 12/01/12 18:32 GMT

An MP had an expense claim rejected after accidentally claiming 20p extra on his mobile phone bill, figures released by the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority (Ipsa) show.

The smallest amount Ipsa declined to pay was 20p after Manchester Withington MP John Leech, a Liberal Democrat, submitted a claim for £14.42 alongside a mobile telephone bill receipt for just £14.22.

Another 25 MPs had £13.50 stopped from their claims for telephone bills - the value of late payment penalty charges which Ipsa refuses to pay.

The watchdog body published details of £3.5 million of expenses claims by MPs, showing claims made in August and September last year.

Ipsa revealed that 52 claims from 41 MPs were knocked back, in part or in full, because they did not meet its criteria for reimbursement by the taxpayer.

Pat Glass, the Labour MP for North West Durham, had a duplicated £134 council tax claim knocked back.

Plaid Cymru's Jonathan Edwards, MP for Carmarthen East and Dinefwr, also had a duplicated council tax claim, for £73.81, rejected.

MPs also repaid £26,944.97 of previously claimed expenses which they no longer wanted to keep, Ipsa revealed.

It said reasons for repayments included MPs no longer wishing to claim for certain items or being refunded on utility bills or business rates for which they had already been imbursed by the taxpayer.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK POLITICS

An MP had an expense claim rejected after accidentally claiming 20p extra on his mobile phone bill, figures released by the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority (Ipsa) show. The smallest a...
An MP had an expense claim rejected after accidentally claiming 20p extra on his mobile phone bill, figures released by the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority (Ipsa) show. The smallest a...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 6
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Allyb999
05:26 PM on 01/16/2012
3.5 million for expenses for 2 months. That works out at approx £5384 per MP over the 2 months. Glad to see "we are all in it together mentality" has not stopped the noses getting buried deep into the trough of public money.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Allyb999
05:31 PM on 01/16/2012
Forgot to say the parliament was in recess during most of this time which makes this claims amounts even more astonishing.
04:48 PM on 01/12/2012
the average claim annually is still £150,000 each, and this from the majority of MP's living within 20 minutes drive to Westminster. At the height of the expenses scandal one of the lowest, if not the lowest amount claimed was the Sunderland MP Chris Mullin on the sixty thousand mark, I can stomach this as its £200 for rail travel to London unless you book in advance, apart from that this bloke probably never would have thought to claim for bog roll, mars bars, light bulbs etc but the rest of these clowns do, basically they get a completely free life from the taxpayer with a bloody decent wage on top, a disgrace considering the mess they leave while totally ignoring any solutions to the situations of the day. By the way since the worthwhile Chris left office his replacements in the S/land area are all up to the 150000 mark while doing little for constituents, my own Easington MP is most likely up there with these other parasites at K150 and all I've seen him do is sit down before he gets any points across, if, he in fact, has any.
02:34 PM on 01/12/2012
Additionally I have yet to hear of a mistaken claim in which the MP gets less than his entitlement.Oddly enough all the "mistakes" seem to be in their favour.
02:31 PM on 01/12/2012
My word it is good to know that we are all in this together.
katertaif
My wife thinks I have one fault. Everything I do!
01:39 PM on 01/12/2012
So basically then they are still at it, having claims disallowed proves that. When you think about it it is amazing. Many of these MP's are from a legal background, and while there are no criteria for the job of MP you would expect that the people who are supposed to be running the country, and making decisions supposedly on our behalf, and in our best interests would be above average in intelligence. Now while I accept that Intelligence is not the same thing at al as common sense. It defies belief that these people should make so many 'mistakes ' in ther expense claims, because that is the invariable excuse. Oh it was a mistake put in in error.is the cry. For example if the husband of an MP, quite prominent in the last government (if you can call it that) wants to watch pornographis movies, that has nothing to do with anyone else. but how come the receipt for these films wound up not only in his wife's possession but submitted as a legitimate expense claim? It was a mistake comes nowhere near to covering that sort of thing.