East Africa Famine Response 'Too Slow', Risked Lives, Finds Save The Children Report

East Africa Famine

First Posted: 18/01/2012 04:56 Updated: 18/01/2012 06:28   PA

Thousands of lives and millions of pounds were lost needlessly because of a "dangerous delay" in the response to the East Africa famine, a report has found.

A "culture of risk aversion" meant the international community failed to take decisive action on early warnings, causing a six month set-back in the relief effort.

Leading aid agencies have now hit out at governments and humanitarian organisations as the report found they were "too slow" to spend money on those in need.

According to Oxfam and Save the Children, who compiled the review, many donors wanted proof of a humanitarian catastrophe before launching action to prevent one.

A likely emergency was forecast by sophisticated early warning systems as early as August 2010 but the full-scale response was not launched until July last year, when malnutrition rates in parts of the region had gone "far beyond the emergency threshold", they found.

Their report, A Dangerous Delay, showed this only came when media coverage reached particularly high levels.

Barbara Stocking, chief executive of Oxfam, said impoverished communities were still "bearing the brunt" of a failure to mount an effective response.

"We all bear responsibility for this dangerous delay that cost lives in East Africa and need to learn the lessons of the late response," she said.

"It's shocking that the poorest people are still bearing the brunt of a failure to respond swiftly and decisively.

"We know that acting early saves lives but collective risk aversion meant aid agencies were reluctant to spend money until they were certain there was a crisis."

Oxfam and Save the Children are calling on governments to overhaul their response to food crises.

Their analysis shows that under the current system, large scale emergency work is funded only when hunger levels reach tipping-point - when lives have already been lost and the cost of the response is much greater.

They have now urged organisations to seek more funding and release this as soon as the crisis signs are clear.

Justin Forsyth, chief executive of Save the Children, said the suffering of thousands of youngsters could have been avoided with "more money when it really mattered".

"We can no longer allow this grotesque situation to continue; where the world knows an emergency is coming but ignores it until confronted with TV pictures of desperately malnourished children," he added.

Estimates suggest between 50,000 and 100,000 lives were lost between April and August, with more than half of that number under the age of five.

The charities have urged governments around the world to sign up to the Charter to End Extreme Hunger, a joint-agency initiative which urges nations to take concrete steps to prevent future catastrophic disasters.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK POLITICS

Thousands of lives and millions of pounds were lost needlessly because of a "dangerous delay" in the response to the East Africa famine, a report has found. A "culture of risk aversion" meant the i...
Thousands of lives and millions of pounds were lost needlessly because of a "dangerous delay" in the response to the East Africa famine, a report has found. A "culture of risk aversion" meant the i...
Filed by Dina Rickman  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 7
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
12:06 PM on 01/18/2012
Generally governments have a responsibility of early warning systems and disaster risk preparedness but the International committee also has measures in place to calculate the level of emerging crises. At times, governments’ action or reaction to emerging crises can be dependent on political or trading concerns or often misplaced belief they can deal with the crisis themselves.

The British public’s generosity is overwhelming and we welcome the fact the UK government is keeping its promise on aid. However more needs to be done to mobilize donor funds earlier to avert predictable crises. It’s also known that donors’ reaction is mostly dependent on visible signs of distress and catastrophe in the media, so it’s vital to illustrate the effect early action can have in preventing a crisis becoming a widespread catastrophe.

We know that the nature of food assistance needs to change from being reactive to being far more proactive. This is why we’re investing large resources in work that will reduce the risk of disasters across East Africa. We are focusing on strengthening the ability of children and their communities to withstand future crises by introducing measures like drought-resistant crops, alternative farming techniques and rainwater harvesting. In this way we hope to help break the cycle of hunger and famine. There are issues of severe food insecurity emerging again in West Africa so we’re already on the ground doing preparedness work to ensure the most vulnerable children receive extra assistance.

Brian Ingle, Head of Disaster Management at Plan UK
Kraptonfactor
They're coming to take me away ha ha, hee hee, ho
11:32 PM on 01/18/2012
Sorry, Brian, we have become far too cynical in the UK to care about starving Africans. We have a massive problem with homelessness here and they don't have the advantage of a warm climate.
We have elderly pensioners who have the choice to eat or heat their homes.
Charity begins at home and we are sick and tired of having starving Africans shoved in our faces every time we watch tv.
Our government has made promises to give taxpayers' money to Africa, India, Pakistan et al without asking if we mind. Well we do mind. Do what you choose to do to help but don't expect us to, we all have our own families to worry about.
Kraptonfactor
They're coming to take me away ha ha, hee hee, ho
10:07 AM on 01/18/2012
An ex aid worker was recently interviewed for a tv documentary and he said that throwing money at the problem was not the answer as most of the money was diverted to the militia, food aid was also confiscated and sold back to the people for whom it was intended.
As Marylin has already pointed out, you only see pictures of women and children/babies on the tv advertisements which are asking for our money, the men are well known to be lazy and feckless. If the fathers cared about their wives and children then they would not keep the women constantly pregnant. If they are weak from starvation they should not have the energy for procreation.
The only way to help these people is to educate them about contraception and sexual health, more of those children will die from AIDS than from starvation.
The governments of these countries also need to be looked at, the resources could be there if their social infrastructure was put in order. Look at Zimbabwe, productive farms given to the 'veterans' who were too lazy to farm them. They are an apathetic race who will never be able to support themselves and it is certainly not our place to keep them in food while the men are sitting around in the shade while the women do all the work. When was the last time you saw a man carrying heavy jugs of water to and from the river? Never! The men are bone idle.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mickbono
huff is crap
08:40 AM on 01/18/2012
birth control would be more appropiate not throwing billions away on a cause that can never be fixed
08:31 AM on 01/18/2012
The West and aid agencies have thrown billions of pounds at this problem for more than 30 years and nothing has changed. Surely the time must be coming when they have to admit that this just does not work and the land simply cannot support the vast number of people trying (or not) to live off it. Very few people live successfully on top of mountains or in the middle of deserts or the outback of Australia or the middle of the ocean because the conditions there are just not compatible with human life. Why is there such a fight in Africa where Nature is saying the exactly the same thing there. All the children that were saved 20 and 30 years ago are still reproducing without contraception and no lessons learned. Contraception of some sort should be mandatory. All the adverts show mother and child - floods have washed away HER home, drought has killed HER crops. Where are the fathers in all this - away playing at guerillas or otherwise avoiding responsibility? I believe that, harsh as it sounds, in many ways these people are the authors of their own destruction - their own governments are less concerned that the West.
07:08 AM on 01/18/2012
To help cut famine they should try contraception, fewer mouths too feed means more food to go round
06:54 AM on 01/18/2012
East Africa?