Leveson Inquiry: How Milly Dowler's Voicemails Were Deleted 'Not The Issue' Claims Guardian Editor

Guardian

PA/Huffington Post UK   First Posted: 17/01/12 18:38 GMT Updated: 17/01/12 20:19 GMT

How Milly Dowler’s voicemails were deleted is “not the prime issue” the editor of the Guardian, the paper that broke the phone hacking story, told the Leveson Inquiry.

The deletion of the voicemails, three days after the schoolgirl went missing in 2002, gave false hope to Dowler’s parents and led to an outpouring of scorn that ultimately forced the closure of the News of the World.

However, in December, Scotland Yard released a statement indicating that it was unlikely that a journalist from News International erased Dowler’s messages, prompting a storm of criticism to be levelled at the Guardian, particularly from former News of the World employees.

Taking the stand at the Leveson Inquiry, Guardian editor Alan Rusbridger said that the deletion of Milly Dowler's voicemails was not the explanation given for closing the Sunday tabloid.

He told the Inquiry: "To some extent it's a siding. I think there were people who are trying to elevate this [the deletion of Milly Dowler's voicemails] into a primary issue now who didn't think that it was at the time.

"I think when you trace back the reasons that were given for the closure of the News of the World at the time, they certainly weren't that."

Mr Rusbridger said establishing how Milly's voicemails were deleted was "not a simple question", as shown by the length of time it is taking to investigate the matter.

The Guardian and the Metropolitan Police have carried out reviews looking at what happened to the schoolgirl's phone messages.

Lord Justice Leveson has said he intends to make the results of these inquiries public, although some details will have to be blanked out.

Earlier on Tuesday, Private Eye Editor Ian Hislop questioned the “cosy” relationship enjoyed by News International and Britain’s top political class.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK

How Milly Dowler’s voicemails were deleted is “not the prime issue” the editor of the Guardian, the paper that broke the phone hacking story, told the Leveson Inquiry. The deletion of the voi...
How Milly Dowler’s voicemails were deleted is “not the prime issue” the editor of the Guardian, the paper that broke the phone hacking story, told the Leveson Inquiry. The deletion of the voi...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 5
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
04:10 PM on 01/18/2012
Really? Now, it's a side issue!?! If the deletions of the voice mails is a side issue, why did he put it on front page in July?

I guess for him, it was only a big issue when they believed that notw was involved in it. Now that it is proven that notw wasn't involved in the deletions, it suddenly became less important. But ironically, they didn't believe so, when they were mentioning the "deleted voice mails" story in every article they could, back in July.

They made a huge mistake. They must admit it and move forward. It's a little bit hypocritical to undermine something that they, at the guardian, were making such a fuss about 6 months ago (and I'm talking only about the voice mails deletion story).
photo
novelist2000
veritas non olet
03:18 AM on 01/18/2012
It is illegal to retrieve data from other people's mobile phones. That is one issue. The other issue is police moonlighting as informers and probably not pay tax on these earnings, which would have shown up as expenses on the publisher's side, reducing their tax.

The threat 'Rebekah Brooks will pursue you for the rest of your life' is unethical. It should not be the role of a publishing house to wreck someone's life when he/she is not doing something illegal.

Last not least, it is not the role of a publishing house or its proprietor to determine who the next Prime Minister or President should be and then arrange for that through biased reporting and space allocations. It is also worrying that the US candidate who is the most likely to bomb Iran without delay, Santorum, has been supported by Rupert Murdoch. Most likely, Santorum will get the best reports, slots on TV, and space in the papers. This publisher manipulates politicians, legislators, people, and countries to make everyone in what image precisely? The influence peddling is what is the problem.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Vapula
Failure is not an option
02:36 AM on 01/18/2012
What arrogance. Since when was it the Guardian's Editor to dictate what the 'issue' is. He should be held in contempt of Parliament and thrown in the dungeons of the Tower of London for his hubris.
10:23 PM on 01/17/2012
The Guardian guilty of false accusations?

Surely not. I'm sure everyone believes everything they read in the press.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tony Booth
07:14 PM on 01/17/2012
totally agree with rusbridger, the dowler voicemail stuff was just the straw that broke the camels back. we were already disgusted with the NoW, the murdochs and their lack of ethics. methinks they protest too much.