Ofsted 'Satisfactory' Rating To Be Scrapped For Schools

Sir Michael Wilshaw

The Huffington Post UK   Dina Rickman First Posted: 17/01/12 08:33 GMT Updated: 17/01/12 08:40 GMT

Schools will no longer be classified as “satisfactory” by inspections, under plans outlined by Ofsted chief Sir Michael Wilshaw.

Sir Michael said the term should be replaced with “requires improvement” as the current rating “covers a multitude of sins”.

“If you listen to what previous chief inspectors have said when they’ve produced their annual report, they say things like satisfactory is not good enough, the quality of teaching in satisfactory schools is not good enough, the progress of children in satisfactory schools is not good enough, and I think we need to be straight with parents, and honest with them, and say that satisfactory is a false designation,” he told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme on Tuesday morning.

His plans were backed by the David Cameron who said in a statement that the change marked a “massive shift in attitude.”

"I don’t want the word ‘satisfactory’ to exist in our education system. “Just good enough” is frankly not good enough. Every teacher, every head and every school should be aiming for excellence – no lower.”

"These words are being backed by action. Schools that ‘require improvement’ will be re-inspected within 12-18 months – instead of the three-year break between inspections they’ve had in recent years.”

Under the plans schools can only be classified as requiring improvement twice, or will be placed in special measures.

"Be in no doubt: this is a government that is incredibly ambitious for all the children in our country – and we will fight for them to get the best start in life,” the prime minister said.

But NUT head  Christine Blower said the change was “derogatory and insulting to pupils, teachers, school leaders and governers.”

“The government’s real agenda behind this change is of course inventing yet another category of schools that it will then seek to force into academy status.

“It is a pity that tomorrow’s Downing Street summit is not discussing what measures the government should be putting in place to support schools at a time when local authority and school budgets, along with capital spending on schools, are being cut.

“The government’s focus should be on identifying and providing the resources that schools need to provide the best possible education for all children. To be constantly changing the goal posts for measuring a school’s success is destabilising and demoralising for the whole school community”.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK UNIVERSITIES & EDUCATION

Schools will no longer be classified as “satisfactory” by inspections, under plans outlined by Ofsted chief Sir Michael Wilshaw. Sir Michael said the term should be replaced with “requires im...
Schools will no longer be classified as “satisfactory” by inspections, under plans outlined by Ofsted chief Sir Michael Wilshaw. Sir Michael said the term should be replaced with “requires im...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 6
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
meddleman
08:25 PM on 01/18/2012
'excellence: the state of excelling.' Surely then not every school, nor even most schools can be excellent. Does David Cameron ever engage his brain before he opens his mouth or is there just no brain there? He is indeed testimony to the inadequacies and limitations of a supposed 'quality' education, mostly in the private sector.
07:58 PM on 01/17/2012
The problem here is much, much simpler than is supposed.

People need to understand the meaning of the word "satisfactory". It means "good enough". Now, correct me if I'm wrong, but if a school is good enough, then there isn't really a problem.

One of the OFSTED criteria is "outstanding". I would point out that this is a relative term, and every school cannot be "outstanding" - it is simply not possible.

Now, if the evaluation outcomes for a school give a report that is "satosfactory" but the inspectors aren't happy bunnies, then they need to re-define the outcome.

I re-iterate - satisfactory is good enough.
02:51 PM on 01/17/2012
how anyone can trust an ofsted report is beyond me these things have been rewritten 12, 15 and even 22 times before they are published for the public, just to make them say what the goverment want. Secondly lets have these so called poor or satasfactory lesson recored and have these inspectors justify their grading, and let parents decide for themselves, the technology is available and give the teacher a chance to defend themselves instead of it all being so secrative. Of course this would be to open for the goverment as many of you now feel is what our goverment does and says just dont add up anymore
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
Mickey Mouse 1
There are no lies or deceit on a chess board.
10:55 AM on 01/17/2012
Tony Blair went on about Education, Education, Education to deflect attention away from the fact the Britain was falling down the international education league. Labour gave the Unions better pay and conditions, early retirement and gold-plated pensions to secure their vote. Useless teachers got the same pay as good ones. The pidgeos are now coming home to roost.
12:37 AM on 01/19/2012
The Labour Party don't 'pay' the unions, some unions sponsor the Labour Party. Teachers don't get early retirement unless they opt for it with reduced pension. Rather than 'bribe' teachers to vote for them (lol) the Blair government actually negotiated successfully for a reduction in the pension bill for teachers in 2007. Buy a different paper or do some research.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
Mickey Mouse 1
There are no lies or deceit on a chess board.
08:41 AM on 01/19/2012
Read what I said: Labour gave the unions better pay and conditions, early retirement and gold-plated pensions in order to secure their vote.