Woman In Black: 'Strong Violence' Cut For Lower Rating

First Posted: 23/01/2012 14:44 Updated: 23/01/2012 14:44   WENN

Movie bosses were forced to re-cut Daniel Radcliffe's new supernatural thriller The Woman In Black to land a less-restrictive age rating in Britain.

Film regulators slapped a 15-classification on the horror, an adaption of Susan Hill's scary novel, meaning viewers under the age of 15 could not see the movie.

However, chiefs at Momentum Pictures were keen to land a 12A-rating to open the film up to a younger audience - and as a result, six seconds of "strong violence" and "horror" have been removed from the final edit.

A statement from the British Board of Film Classification (BBFC) reads: "This work was cut. The cut(s) were made at the request of the distributor to achieve a particular category.

"To obtain this category cuts of zero m (minutes) six (seconds) were required. Distributor chose to reduce moments of strong violence/horror in order to achieve a '12A' classification.

"Cuts made in line with BBFC Guidelines and policy (sic). A 15 classification without cuts was available. In addition to the six seconds of visual cuts, substitutions were also made by darkening some shots and by reducing the sound levels on others."

The film is set for release Friday 10 February.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK ENTERTAINMENT

Movie bosses were forced to re-cut Daniel Radcliffe's new supernatural thriller The Woman In Black to land a less-restrictive age rating in Britain. Film regulators slapped a 15-classification on t...
Movie bosses were forced to re-cut Daniel Radcliffe's new supernatural thriller The Woman In Black to land a less-restrictive age rating in Britain. Film regulators slapped a 15-classification on t...
Filed by Sarah Dean  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 7
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
drwtsn
Could I please get an upgrade to a macro-bio?
00:57 on 24/01/2012
They cut six seconds?!? Now I'll never be able to follow the plot.
01:32 on 24/01/2012
You're too funny.....lol
20:36 on 23/01/2012
It was the distributor who wanted it cut -- More opportunities to get teenager's babysitting money.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Donald J Sullivan
Monetary Reform Now
20:16 on 23/01/2012
Who is handling this guys career? All his moves to date have stunk ( Equis, Broadway singing midget and now PG spooky movie. We all know PG spooky movies STINK! He needs to get involved with some independent film makers and shake that Potter image.
photo
Valksy
civis mundi sum
19:06 on 23/01/2012
Sick to death of making everything kid friendly. Some content is intended for adults and some adults don't want to be spoon fed the entertainment equivalent of bloody baby food.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
catboycolo
I'll have the coffee, not the KoolAid
16:27 on 23/01/2012
pity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert Brooks
I'm not a professional and I will try this at home
15:43 on 23/01/2012
STOP F-ING WITH ARTISTIC LICENSE! Let the fans decide. Like 3-D, roll in both versions.