Frying Food ‘Doesn't Increase Heart Disease Risks' Claims Study

Frying Food Doesnt Increase Heart Disease Risks

PA/The Huffington Post UK   First Posted: 25/01/2012 06:26 Updated: 25/01/2012 16:41

A new study has discovered that, contrary to popular belief, people who fry their food in sunflower or olive oil aren’t increasing their risks of heart disease.

According to researchers, their findings go against the idea that frying food is bad for the heart as they discovered that using certain oils when cooking makes no difference to a persons heart health.

Researchers analysed data from almost 41,000 adults aged between 29 and 69 who did not have heart disease at the start of the study.

They were divided into four groups according to how often they ate foods fried in olive and sunflower oil. These were monitored between high and low amounts of oils and took into account foods that were deep fried, pan fried, crumbed, sauteed and battered.

The researchers looked at the 11-year follow-up on the participants and found that just over 600 of them suffered coronary heart disease ‘events’ and 1,100 people died from any cause.

The researchers analysis found no differences between the four groups and the results did not vary between those who sued olive oil for frying and those who used sunflower oil. Or none at all.

"In a Mediterranean country where olive and sunflower oils are the most commonly used fats for frying, and where large amounts of fried foods are consumed both at and away from home, no association was observed between fried food consumption and the risk of coronary heart disease or death,” the study wrote in the British Medical Journal (BMJ).

The study added that while eating a plentiful of fried foods carry risks of increases blood pressure, cholesterol and obesity, which can all lead to heart disease, there is still no direct link between cooking oils and heart health.

"Taken together, the myth that frying food is generally bad for the heart is not supported by available evidence. However, this does not mean that frequent meals of fish and chips will have no health consequences.,” adds Professor Michael Leitzman, from the University of Regensburg in Germany.

Talking to The Huffington Post, Eva Lopez, macrobiotic consellor from the SHA Wellness Clinic in Spain said: “In general the more unsaturated oil is, the more volatile and sensitive to heat and light oxidation it is. And the more saturated is the reverse. So the animal fat, saturated, usually solid at room temperature, while the plant is usually liquid.

“But on the other side, as everyone knows the saturated fats are not advisable for our health. So given the choice, better animal vegetable fat, and certainly avoid margarine (hydrogenated vegetable fat very harmful to our health, especially cardiovascular).”

To find out which cooking oils are better than others, we spoke to nutritionist Angela Dowden to see which oils keep the heart healthy.


FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK LIFESTYLE

A new study has discovered that, contrary to popular belief, people who fry their food in sunflower or olive oil aren’t increasing their risks of heart disease. According to researchers, their fi...
A new study has discovered that, contrary to popular belief, people who fry their food in sunflower or olive oil aren’t increasing their risks of heart disease. According to researchers, their fi...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 188
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
17:23 on 27/01/2012
"So given the choice, better animal vegetable fat..."
Pardon?
Please proofread your article!
17:21 on 26/01/2012
all things in moderation. including moderation.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Alex Christie
r evolution is coming
14:51 on 26/01/2012
We should be much more concerned about what kind of chemicals are in our food rather than which kind of oil. It's the artificial ingredients that are making us sick.
16:40 on 26/01/2012
Damn right mate.
Heaven knows what stuff there is that we don't know about.
I suspect that a lot of cancer is caused by the crap in our food
02:56 on 27/01/2012
alien eggs
04:31 on 27/01/2012
Spot on alex/
Not just in our food, but in the air, decades ago
we were told that diesel fumes were harmless,
now we are told the fumes are a killer.
Iam old enough too remember these reports,
better too err on the safe side, with all toxins.
wes
photo
ginadeoliveira2008
Seen a shooting star tonight and I thought of you
17:57 on 25/01/2012
Great news! Loved it! I'll buy sunflower oil from now on, even if I'm not that used to frying food.
17:52 on 25/01/2012
Fry all the foods!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
FromWayDowntown
Qui a coupé le fromage ?
17:40 on 25/01/2012
More lamentable evidence that the art of proofreading is well and truly lost:

"...using certain oils when cooking makes no difference to a persons heart health."

"The researchers analysis found no differences..."

"...results did not vary between those who sued olive oil for frying..." {{{my personal favorite!]

"The study added that while eating a plentiful of fried foods carry risks of increases blood pressure..."

"...frequent meals of fish and chips will have no health consequences.,”

"Eva Lopez, macrobiotic consellor from the SHA Wellness Clinic..."

"So the animal fat, saturated, usually solid at room temperature, while the plant is usually liquid."
17:11 on 26/01/2012
You're right. Shouldn't that read a PLATEFUL of fried foods?
17:21 on 26/01/2012
Silly me -of course it should. Sorry, not concentrating!
02:59 on 27/01/2012
Yes, and this makes no sense - "So given the choice, better animal vegetable fat, and certainly avoid margarine.."
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
16:57 on 25/01/2012
First the researchers said that drinking coffee was bad...

then they said it was good....
then they said it was bad again...
then they said it was good.....but...
then they said it was bad again.

Nobody believes the experts anymore.
17:33 on 25/01/2012
Nobody? Maybe we should just go with "gut instinct" on matters of science? Nobody realistically expects the experts to suddenly say tomatoes are bad for you, or that wonder bread is suddenly better for you than whole grains. It's not like some uncertainty on a few fronts calls into question all of the expert knowledge.
17:50 on 25/01/2012
The expert truck is coming!
16:55 on 25/01/2012
However, bacon and other cures meats have been tied to pancreatic cancer. You can't have bacon everyday.
17:50 on 25/01/2012
How about uncured bacon?
03:10 on 27/01/2012
only when there is a n in the name of the day
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RTG5
16:51 on 25/01/2012
What is it about nutrition that makes everyone think they're an expert? I can't think of any other topic besides religion where so many people are convinced that they know the "secret truth" and most everyone else is misguided.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
goatboyslim
It's a good day to die,but I prefer to wait
17:08 on 25/01/2012
I think it's a variation of confirmation bias. We have a general idea of what's healthy-which usually coincides with what we like to eat-then we look for nutritional info that tells us it's ok to eat what we like. I realized this when looking at one of the "Paleo" diets, and I was thinking yep, check, check, then-whoa, no beans? that's crazy, they're wrong on that one, when I had no more info to disagree than I did to agree. I want to eat beans, I think they're good for me, and that's that.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RTG5
20:29 on 25/01/2012
Yeah, I agree that is probably a big part of it. There's just so much contrary evidence out there that you can make a vaguely plausible case in your own head to justify any diet.

I would say that in addition to justifying what we want many people also believe what they're afraid is true: that everything that tastes good must be bad for you.
03:01 on 27/01/2012
you need to eat the green part of the garlic
16:48 on 25/01/2012
“But on the other side, as everyone knows the saturated fats are not advisable for our health."

Except for of course, anyone who actually understands saturated fats. Anyone who actually understands saturated fats knows that they are actually a very good thing, and there is a mountain of evidence to confirm that. Our ancestors have gone out of their way to consume saturated fats for millions and millions of years. Comparatively, processed vegetable oils are a blip in human history.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cestpasvrai
Il n'y a pas de lézard.
16:58 on 25/01/2012
THANK YOU! Saturated fat is BRAIN FOOD! I make sure I get plenty of it in my diet (I cook with lots of butter!). I avoid simple carbs and vegetable oils... anything that's processed. I am also as healthy as can be. I cannot stand this war against saturated fats and cholesterol. It is just so completely absurd if you know anything about basic anatomy.
17:34 on 25/01/2012
George Burns was a smoker and lived to be over 100. Does that mean smoking isn't harmful?
19:45 on 26/01/2012
You are definitely on to something, cestpasvrai! I also make sure to get plenty of saturated fat in my diet as well. I almost exclusively cook with ghee - which is clarified butter that I make myself. And when I don't cook with ghee, I use unrefined coconut oil. Our bodies need saturated fats to help assimilate essential nutrients. So here's to a "healthy" teaspoon of ghee in my oatmeal on a cold winter morning and cheers to good health!
17:03 on 25/01/2012
However, our ancestors had very short life spans. The idea promulgated by Atkins and his ilk that saturated fat is good for you does not hold water. In fact, the evidence is out there that suggests Atkins himself died of heart disease. His family would not allow an autopsy to confirm or deny that, but my feeling is that they were more interesting in protecting the reputation of a highly profitable enterprise based on false suppositions than in the truth.
18:52 on 25/01/2012
Your argument about heart disease and the life-spans of our ancestors has no basis in science, and your anecdotal example of Atkins, who died of complications from head trauma according to the autopsy, is almost as tacky as it is meaningless.

In reality, a meta-analysis of major research on saturated fat and heart disease, spanning 347,747 test subjects, found that there is absolutely no connection between saturated fat and heart disease whatsoever! And as a matter of fact, numerous studies comparing dieters eating more saturated fat to dieters on low-fat diets, have found that the dieters eating more saturated fat had considerably better heart health indicators!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
edva
Capitalism vs Humanity
16:10 on 25/01/2012
What about coconut oil?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Scooterish
Please pass the meat!
17:51 on 25/01/2012
Is good for you!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PhilEssex
Statistically, 6 out of 7 dwarves are not happy.
13:32 on 26/01/2012
Coconut is bad for your Cholestrol
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PhilEssex
Statistically, 6 out of 7 dwarves are not happy.
00:25 on 27/01/2012
Fats and cholesterol
There are two main types of fat – saturated and unsaturated. Eating foods that are high in saturated fat can raise cholesterol levels in the blood. Most people in the UK eat too much saturated fat.

Foods high in saturated fat include:

•meat pies
•sausages and fatty cuts of meat
•butter
•ghee
•lard
•cream
•hard cheese
•cakes and biscuits
•foods containing coconut or palm oil
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jim NLN
Hillary-Frank 2016
15:54 on 25/01/2012
Some one needs to edit that article for spelling, grammar and just plain messed up sentences.
20:01 on 25/01/2012
But I am among "...those who sued olive oil for frying," and I have yet to see a penny!
Koiquoe
Have an unyielding faith in yourself
15:36 on 25/01/2012
They say honey is very good for you, so I started putting honey in my tea (5 cups, 5 tsps per day). Generally, my diet is very healthy, I exercise regularly and vigorously (in fact, just left the gym), and I am generally conscientious of what I eat. Before honey, my pants were all beginning to get too big for me in the waist. But since honey, I can't realize the same effect. I am beginning to think honey breaks down into sugar and has the same effect as sugar. What do you think?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
UCBAlum
16:50 on 25/01/2012
Table sugar has a glycemic index of 60. Honey is 58. They are virtually identical with respect to how they raise your blood sugar after consumption.
16:57 on 25/01/2012
Honey is sugar.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cestpasvrai
Il n'y a pas de lézard.
16:59 on 25/01/2012
Most people don't understand the GI. Unfortunately.
photo
CoastalNC
Good thoughts create good things
17:19 on 25/01/2012
Sugar is suger whatever form it comes in...that includes honey.
15:26 on 25/01/2012
Almond oil is good too.
Put 2 tablespoons spoons on a hot bath. Very nice for the skin!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Scooterish
Please pass the meat!
17:53 on 25/01/2012
As well as sesame oil. Great for calming nerves!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
15:19 on 25/01/2012
But stay away from refined sugars and processed carbs...