Sir Richard Branson To Urge MPs To Decriminalise Drugs

Richard Branson Decriminalise Drugs

PA/The Huffington Post   First Posted: 24/01/2012 06:59 Updated: 24/01/2012 08:53

Sir Richard Branson will tell MPs on Tuesday that the government should consider decriminalising drugs.

The war on drugs has failed and alternative, fact-based approaches are needed to reduce the harm caused by narcotics, the tycoon will say.

Sir Richard will be among the first to give evidence as the Commons Home Affairs Select Committee launches the first parliamentary inquiry into drugs policy for more than 10 years.

It comes as new guidelines for sentencing in drugs cases were issued to judges.

So-called drug mules, who bring narcotics into the country and are often exploited by organised criminals, could serve less time in prison from next month under the guidelines, which were set by the Sentencing Council.

It has also been reported that clinical trials of "magic mushroom therapy" could take place in the UK within a year following two ground-breaking studies.

Professor David Nutt, the former government drug advisor who was sacked for criticising the decision to toughen cannabis laws, has said it was a mistake to have abandoned research into the medicinal use psychedelic drugs.

The previous Commons inquiry in 2002, when David Cameron was on the committee as a Tory MP, said drug use was a "passing phase" for many young people which "rarely results in any long-term harm".

The cross-party group dismissed legalisation and decriminalisation as a way forward but, paving the way for future changes, urged ministers to lobby for the loosening of international treaties which prohibit such radical steps.

Speaking more than 10 years ago, Cameron added that the UK's drugs policy "has been failing for decades" and said he hoped the report "will encourage fresh thinking and a new approach".

But the Home Office has already said it has "no intention of liberalising our drugs laws".

Sir Richard is a member of the Global Commission on Drug Policy, whose members include former United Nations secretary general Kofi Annan.

It warned in June last year that major policy reforms were needed to help reduce the prison population and stop wasting millions of pounds.

Dame Judi Dench was among a host of high-profile stars to back the call, saying an "immediate decriminalisation of drug possession" should follow if a policy review showed it had failed.

The government's official drugs advisers have also called for possession to be decriminalised.

The Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs (ACMD) said there was an "opportunity to be more creative" in dealing with those accused of possessing drugs, sending them on awareness courses rather than charging them with criminal offences.

Ruth Dreifuss, the former president of Switzerland, will also give evidence to the MPs today.

Keith Vaz, the committee's chairman, said: "We will be talking to a number of people during what is sure to be a long-running inquiry.

"I look forward to hearing the commission's evidence on why the war on drugs has failed and why it is now time to decriminalise drugs and focus on providing treatment to drug users in a bid to bring an end to the destructive cycle of addiction."

He added: "Drugs can be a hugely controversial issue but we hope that this will be the start of a balanced, well-reasoned inquiry."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK POLITICS

Sir Richard Branson will tell MPs on Tuesday that the government should consider decriminalising drugs. The war on drugs has failed and alternative, fact-based approaches are needed to reduce the h...
Sir Richard Branson will tell MPs on Tuesday that the government should consider decriminalising drugs. The war on drugs has failed and alternative, fact-based approaches are needed to reduce the h...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 75
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
12:14 PM on 01/28/2012
Continually loosening certain laws isn't good for the country. Labour downgraded cannabis and that has caused a lot of problems. Labour loosened the laws on gambling and now we allow things even the US forbids - and we will see more people crippled by gambling debt and the huge growth of gambling ads and programmes on TV, brainwashing people - and Labour brought in 24 hour drinking and look at the effects - particularly on the National Health.
04:41 PM on 01/26/2012
How about decriminalising tobbacco first so we can bring as much as we like into the country?
01:22 AM on 01/28/2012
wow, that should be useful.
12:26 AM on 01/26/2012
Got to admire the man. Always looking out for a new opportunity to earn a few quid. Virgin coke could take on a whole new meaning.
Craigzz
God must like pinball
11:53 AM on 01/25/2012
Latest US poll shows 50% in favour of cannabis legalisation as opposed to 46% against. One would have to question the motives of organisations claiming drug use is in decline, it is virtually impossible to get statistically accurate figures for just how widespread drug use is, when the drugs themself are illegally classified, but this recent US poll is quite literally a landmark in the history of cannabis prohibition, and attitudes toward it.
05:58 PM on 01/24/2012
Cigerattes & alcohol are already decrimialised and look at the medical and social problems they bring. Just because he's finacially successful doesn't mean he has a clue about morals.
12:31 AM on 01/26/2012
I think you'll find that smokers are pretty much viewed as criminals these days, I'm not a smoker, but it does amuse me that one person lighting a cigarette in a pub or restaurant will get prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. But if you open a chemical factory you can pump as much s**t into the atmosphere as you please.

Odd world we live in isn't it.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
marijobama
Prohibition is NOT an enumerated power.
03:12 PM on 01/24/2012
"I look forward to hearing the commission's evidence on why the war on drugs has failed and why it is now time to decriminalise drugs and focus on providing treatment to drug users in a bid to bring an end to the destructive cycle of addiction." For many drugs, like the psychedelics, and especially for marijuana, occasional recreational use is not a "destructive cycle of addiction". In fact, our own government statistics show that prescription drugs are more likely to be "abused", and are the leading cause of death by overdose. They can't get it into their skulls that "use", especially of marijuana, is not "abuse", and that there is no need for dependence or addiction counceling of any kind for most of us.
lastpost
see biography
02:22 PM on 01/24/2012
"Sir Richard Branson To Urge MPs To Decriminalise Drugs"
Seems that someone views privatizing the profitable aspects and nationalizing the collateral damage as a way forward. There are solutions that can be tried. But they cannot be seen from current standpoints.
01:42 PM on 01/24/2012
I think Richard Branson is right but then again I was rated as being similar to Anand Grover on thinkingdrugs.org when I took their quiz.
12:32 PM on 01/24/2012
Bit broad the term Drugs. I can see the arguments about Cannabis which appears from all the research to be less addictive and harmful than alcohol. But do you really think Heroin is in the same category? Then we have the intermediates - Exstacy and date rape drugs and things. What do you do with them. Seen a few deaths from some of these.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
David Duncan 1
For Science!
12:43 PM on 01/24/2012
Ecstacy is a relatively safe drug - I believe Professor David Nutt once published a paper that compared the rate of hospitalisation between instances of taking ecstacy and instances of horse riding and found that horse riding was significantly more dangerous (something like 1 in 350 exposures to horse riding ends in a hospital trips, apposed to around 1 in a 1000 for ecstacy). There are a large number of recreational activities that incur some amount of danger in them (sky diving, bungee jumping, riding motorcycles, etc).
01:21 AM on 01/28/2012
people die more often from taking mdma than from riding accidents.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
David Duncan 1
For Science!
12:47 PM on 01/24/2012
Though I think the issue that Branson is driving at is more along the lines that prohibition simply does not work - there is very little evidence that banning a recreational drug makes people less likely to use it, but instead makes the industry unregulated (making an inherently dangerous product more dangerous), and puts significant power and money in the hands of people not concerned with legal ramifications.
01:18 PM on 01/24/2012
Thanks for that Duncan

Yes I remember those figures, but working in the Health Service I seem to see the down side of these things. On the prohibition comment though I would add that Murder is prohibited and that doesn't work either. Would we legalise it on that basis? There a few I would like to murder sometimes!!!!!!
12:29 PM on 01/24/2012
can feel another business coming on here - Virgin High. and its not a school.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Compassionnotreligion
Be awed & humbled by nature & empathy -not Juju.
12:17 PM on 01/24/2012
Branson will say:

"The war on drugs has failed and alternative, fact-based approaches are needed to reduce the harm caused by narcotics"

When were fact-based approaches ever taken by either Labour or the Tories?

And sure enough "... the Home Office has already said it has "no intention of liberalising our drugs laws".

So what's the point of having an enquiry then? Just to (waste our money whilst) make it look like something is being done?

Of couse we should not be surprised, since conservative by definition, tend to defend the status quo, embracing change reluctantly and often after the event.

In other words, doesn't matter what the evidence is, we're going to stick with what ISN'T working.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
David Duncan 1
For Science!
12:34 PM on 01/24/2012
No party will dare legalise drugs because the red tops will then spend the entire election doing stories on innocent little sarah and innocent little bobby who were "tricked" by the idea of a drug being legal meaning it is safe.... etc. Litte sarah and little bobby's tear stained mothers on sky news saying the PM is directly responsible for the "murder" or her innocent little child.

So any change like this will require cross-party support, and will require broad national consent. It will also require us having to ammend certain treaties we have signed with the Americans, etc. In other words a change like this will probably take several parliaments to do.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Compassionnotreligion
Be awed & humbled by nature & empathy -not Juju.
12:48 PM on 01/24/2012
True.

And funny how they don't bother with calling for a ban on the things which cause far greater numbers of people to be killed and hurt:

Fireworks
Dogs
Alcohol
cigarettes
Erm... (Allergic reaction to) bees...?!

Of course this is a complex issue, and it can be argued that alcohol and cigarettes cause proportionally more deaths because they are more widely used. But when virtually every person who knows at first hand about the subject - e.g. police chiefs, scientists, and psychologists - are ALL agreed that decriminisation is the way to go, then we should be able to be grown up enough to ignore the idiotic rantings of the red tops for what they are.

Or rather, the governments should be bold enough to at least be open to making AN ATTEMPT to change things rather than declaring that they won't, regardless. But of course their real concern is simply being re-elected, not actually changing things - just doing as little as possible to look like they're doing something whilst staying 'safe'.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Lawyer13
retired Lawyer, General and Psychiatric Nurse, wit
12:11 PM on 01/24/2012
I think that Sir Richard Branson has a good point, it would save so much money and people who use drugs could get proper help and treatment, Holland and Portugal seem to have had no problems. We would also save a fortune in judicial time and put less people in prison which must be positive too.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
David Duncan 1
For Science!
12:36 PM on 01/24/2012
One of the advantages of decriminalising drugs (note that there is a significant difference to legalising a drug and decriminalising it - technically drugs are still illegal in the Netherlands and Portugal, it is just no longer a criminal offense) is that since addicts are not as hidden, not only are addicts more free to seek help, but people are more accessible for aid agencies to help.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Lawyer13
retired Lawyer, General and Psychiatric Nurse, wit
04:02 AM on 01/25/2012
David Duncan 1 you have just earned fan #4 for this post and good luck to you. F & F
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Matthew Harrold
Huzzah!
11:46 AM on 01/24/2012
If you decriminilised use and the possesion of small amounts of drugs, then all the money saved on convicting and imprisoning users can instead be put towards treatement and rehabilitation. It's a shocking concept, I know.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
David Duncan 1
For Science!
12:15 PM on 01/24/2012
Drug addicts already receive treatment and rehabilitation in jail, so it is a rather moot argument. And the general experience is that decriminilisation of drugs does not lead to an increase in drug use rates (see Netherlands and Portugal) - the evidence implies, if anything, a downwards trend, though not a statistically significant one.
11:29 AM on 01/24/2012
Dont forget professor Nutt, who was ousted by political heavy handedness after his study basically dumped on the current illegality of various drugs relative to harm/deaths.
11:27 AM on 01/24/2012
Say if we legalise drugs,people will become addicted ,and run out of money from fueling their dependency and then we are back to square one ! Mobile phones are legal ,but people steal these because they want money it is as simple as that " money is the means to the root of all evil "Oil is legal ,but look at all the trouble that has caused ,legalising drug use will benifit nobody except the government ,just another excuse to make them more money ( is the means to the route of all evil !. . . )