Climate Change Report Masks True Depths Of Global Impact, Activists Say

Flood

First Posted: 26/01/2012 17:33 Updated: 26/01/2012 17:34

Climate change is set to change almost every aspect of life in the UK, according to a landmark government report - but as environmental activists point out, it's still the world's poorest countries that will be worst affected.

That's not to downplay the effects on the UK. The picture painted by the report is stark and dramatic.

Higher temperatures could see up to 5,900 more people dying as a result of hot summers, and the costs to the UK of flooding could rise to billions of pounds a year.

The UK will also face threats including water shortages, more droughts and diseases such as red band needle blight which could hit the timber industry in the next century, the assessment conducted for the government showed.

Admittedly the changing climate will bring some opportunities to the UK too, including the chance to grow new crops and even the possibility of more tourism as temperatures get milder, the report says.

But the risk assessment, released by the Department of Environment and Rural Affairs, also admits that the developing world will be affected far more deeply, and be able to adapt far less easily, to the same process - and that could wreak havoc on our own ability to deal with the crisis effectively.

The report also admits that there is far more research that needs to be done.

"A considerable amount of further work needs to be done on international risks, and the National Adaptation Programme will take the global impacts of climate change into account," the report said.

That admission chimes with predictions by the UN that more than 1bn people around the world will be affected by climate change by 2050 - the majority in the developing world.

A recent visualisation of the impact of a changing climate by National Geographic also illustrated well just how serious the problem facing poor countries really is.

Craig Bennett, director of policy and campaigns of Friends of the Earth, is adamant that wealthy countries have a responsibility to help fund extensive research and planning efforts in the developing world.

"In a way we get off lightly in this country compared to other countries," Bennett said. "And yet it is the poorest countries in the world that will suffer most from climate change even though they have the least to do with why it's happening in the first place."

The cost of the government's project of which the report was a part was more than £2.8m - and it was mandated by the Climate Change Act as a matter of law, Bennett points out. Other countries in the developing world have neither the finances or the political will to respond in kind.

Those countries are also the least likely to be able to adapt to deal with extreme weather, including flooding from rising sea levels, and rising temperatures.

"There are two things that have to happen," he said. "Critically we do need to see the rich countries help put the facilities and funding in place to enable studies like this to be done in other countries and regions of the world.

"But actually what is then behind that is rich countries needing to provide the funding for those countries to adapt, both to support their low-carbon development but also to provide them with the money that's needed to adapt to climate change."

The cost may seem high, Bennett says - but it's nothing compared to what it will cost once the effects of climate change really take hold.

"We're talking around £200bn per annum," he said. "That's tiny compared to the kind of money that's currently being found to bail out the banks.

"The rich countries really need to live up to their responsibilities and start thinking about how they're going to find this smaller sum of money to bail out the poorest countries from the impact of climate change."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK

Climate change is set to change almost every aspect of life in the UK, according to a landmark government report - but as environmental activists point out, it's still the world's poorest countries th...
Climate change is set to change almost every aspect of life in the UK, according to a landmark government report - but as environmental activists point out, it's still the world's poorest countries th...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 20
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
23:28 on 26/01/2012
It's very simple. There are just two questions to be asked and answered.

1. Are CO2 and H2O greenhouse gases - i.e. gases which have the effect of trapping infra-red light, thus having a warming effect, or are they not?

2. Has human activity increased the proportion of CO2 and H2O in the atmosphere, and indeed changed the proportion in particular levels of the atmosphere, or not?

Once those two questions are answered, objectively and honestly, there really is no further debate about "if".

And if people are unsure of the answer to those two questions, then perhaps they ought to do their own research before expressing an opinion.
nelthroppesq
Attorney in allentown,pa
18:51 on 30/01/2012
The answer to your questions is possibly; however, even if the answer is categorically yes, the issue becomes one of degree. There are many scientists who do not agree with the conclusion of the global warming alarmists and that there are other factors involved in this idea of climate change besides carbon emmissions. There is also the issue of the fact that the earth has undergone cooling and warming trends in the past.
23:54 on 30/01/2012
There are VERY FEW scientists who disagree that the earth is warming, measurably.

Now, the answers to my questions are not really open to debate. CO2 and H2O demonstrably ARE gases that have the effect of trapping infra red light. That has been demonstrated in lab conditions. No debate, no argument, it is a fact.

And it is also a fact that in the last 200 years, the proportion of CO2 in the atmosphere has increased from 280 ppm to 340 ppm, and furthermore, that rate of increase is exponential. http://www.elmhurst.edu/~chm/vchembook/images/lawdome.GIF

Now, what has happened in the last 200 years that could possibly have released all this CO2 into the atmosphere? 3 things. De-forestation, the burining of fossil fuels, and the mammoth increase in the smelting of iron and steel, which in addition to using carbon as a fuel and reactant, also uses Calcium Carbonate, chucking out masses more CO2.

A fourth factor has just begun to occur. As the oceans warm, they are less able to retain dissolved gases, which means yet more CO2 is released into the atmosphere, and as the forests are cut down, not only is CO2 released, but less is fixed.

The only question which is vaguely open to debate is "by how much does this additional CO2 affect the temperature"?

You point out that there are other factors at work, but by adding all that CO2, you add ANOTHER factor into the equation.
22:20 on 26/01/2012
"Craig Bennett, director of policy and campaigns of Friends of the Earth, is adamant that wealthy countries have a responsibility to help fund extensive research and planning efforts in the developing world."

Really? That would assume we created climate change which I very much doubt. Mr Bennett is insisting we are liable which we are not. We should help where it also serves our interest to do so.
21:58 on 26/01/2012
i live in west cornwall and can safley say that the warming up has not started here in fact for the last 10yrs we have had hardly any summer season and when i was a child every summer night was warm but now summer evenings are very cold our summers have been abysmal for a long time we have a warm weather in april may but after that nothing its certainly not getting hotter
21:53 on 26/01/2012
When it was unseasoably hot at the end of September, the tabloid press was wetting its pants as it predicted the harshest British winter yet--and the beginnings of a new ice age. What happened?

So how come the experts can tell us what it will be like in the next century?

The climate change industry is a multifold con: useless politicans crave yet more money for their hubristic activities so they're scaring us into paying new taxes, knowing like any right-minded person that the cash will not be use to stop or control climate change because we can't control long-term cyclical change. It will be wasted. Also, global capitalism can extract yet more profit at taxpayer's expense with their absurd carbon credit scheme which will facilitate new markets in third world countries now they've raped and bankrupted the first world with consumerism. Finally comes the demand for more research from the university layabouts living on research grants and tagging along with the climate change gravy train.
21:35 on 26/01/2012
It is the climate change issue more than any other that makes me the most hesitant about announcing which side of the fence I fall. On one side you have the utterly paranoid crackpot deniers who think that facts and evidence should be shunned because it's actually all a conspiracy to milk them for more taxes (?!) and on the other we find the eco freaks who think that we owe the Earth some sort of debt for being here, neither of which I want to be associated with. I do feel for the scientists, stuck in the middle, who are just trying to do their job with integrity.

So, just for the record, my position is that the climate has changed continuously since there has been a climate to change regardless of whether humans had anything to do with it or not. Life will go on, and without us if it has to. Nothing humans can do to the environment compares to what nature has already done to itself a million times over.
21:29 on 26/01/2012
britain is doing its best to combat climate change but its wasting its time as india ,china and a lot of the third world are contributing so greenhouse gasses that they deserve all they get regarding flooding and drought , the amazon is being felled and will soon be a desert . all england can do is to adapt ,we will benefit as it will get warmer and we will save on heating bills ,we can grow crops that can be planted earlier , and once we start using all the pastures for cattle and sheep instead of letting it go to waste we will become self sufficiant .thats if we stop the EEC from interfearing in our agricultural policies
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mickbono
huff is crap
21:11 on 26/01/2012
more scare mongering to put taxes up again
21:06 on 26/01/2012
The world climate changes, it has got hot and it has got cold, it happens.
The reasons are various, from sun spot activity, natural terrestrial phenomena such as volcanoes and who knows what on Earth else.
There is however a point in using less energy where we can, the oil, gas and even coal reserves do not seem to be being replenished.
Best save some for future generations?
We have, on our Island Nation, the benefit of tides, once harnessed they can give a constant renewable source of clean energy.
We would not be prey to the oil and gas rich nations, we could even export our energy to those who want to buy it.
Our natural resouce of tide/wave power could make us richer than the saudies and no fear of the energy running out.
20:33 on 26/01/2012
What a load of drivel. Nobody can predict climate change with only a few hundred years of stats to work on . This planet has been around for millions of years producing more "pollution " than humans ever will, yet now we face armageddon.
The Greens have too much of a vested interest now to back off and the establishement does not allow any proper discussion of the alternative views.

The Greens have taken a leaf out of the book of the Gay lobby, the anti hunting lobby and Aleck Salmond, where instead of listening to alternative arguments they simply attack anyone with opposing views
20:31 on 26/01/2012
More global warming boll*cks, its a con.
20:44 on 26/01/2012
Thick point of view but who cares .....
20:14 on 26/01/2012
Hmmmmm global warming......bring it on... Costa del Scotland!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
redsquad
Shootin' from the lip
20:10 on 26/01/2012
"Tourism increase due to hot weather"? You ignorant, dimwitted, shallow, short-sighted dolts...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
dsole1948
It is our duty to speak out against injustice
20:10 on 26/01/2012
There’s no doubt man has affected the earth’s climate just look at all the hot air spouted from politicians elected and un-elected add to that the creed of business and its demand for continual growth then everyone on this lump or rock in space has problems to come. The fact that the earth warms and cools naturally over time and as I understand it the way this rock spins in space means that one day what is now north will become south. But the fanatics of anything in this world don’t let the true facts get in the way their interpretation is the one and only true version whether it be religion or science. If we got facts without hysteria presentation without Hollywood dramatics and science without illusion probably global warming just might be seen has something we need to take seriously, I’m not yet convinced.
20:00 on 26/01/2012
We must start building houses,too cope
with these variants, in the weather,
i have no doubt this will happen.
Already we built houses on flood plains ect,
big mistake, should never had been done.
Iam not a panic merchant, but we must plan
for the future.
We need more common sense now in this
country and less spin, lets get something right for once.
wes
21:00 on 26/01/2012
You are correct, building in a flood plain is stupid, the description of the geography gives you all one needs to know about what is bound to happen.
19:53 on 26/01/2012
fixed numbers