London 2012 Olympics: G4S Receives 34,000 Applications For Security Jobs At Games

PA/The Huffington Post UK   First Posted: 26/01/2012 12:28 Updated: 27/03/2012 10:12

Security firm G4S has received 34,000 applications for 10,0000 security jobs at the London 2012 Olympic Games.

So far 20,000 of the G4S applications have been made by London-based residents and 4,500 roles have already been allocated.

The 23,700-strong security force that will be deployed for the Games is a mix of military, private security guards and at least 3,000 unpaid London 2012 volunteers who will be used at the start of the security process.

The military will provide 13,500 personnel, which is more than the 10,000 that were deployed to Afghanistan. G4S staff will be paid from £8.50 an hour in what the company is billing as "the biggest paid recruitment drive of the century".

G4S opened the doors today to its recruitment centre in east London, a stone's throw away from the Olympic Park in Stratford.

Candidates will be asked to attend an interview at the recruitment centre, where they will go through a screening and vetting process before their application is submitted to London 2012 for accreditation.

The recruitment centre will also serve as a training facility, where new recruits will be put through their paces and provided with role-specific training to ensure they are fully prepared for the Games.

Would-be security staff will face a thorough screening, according to London 2012 chief executive Paul Deighton.

He said: "This is G4S's core business and they have rigorous processes. On top of that, we have an Olympic accreditation process with a series of checks so this is about as tough as it can possibly be."

Mark Hamilton, managing director of G4S security personnel, said the aim is for a "safe and secure" Games, adding: "In addition, our training will provide successful applicants with a professional security services qualification that will kick-start their careers in the sector post-2012.

"During the London Games, G4S employees will carry out a variety of tasks, including bag and vehicle searching."

The critical on-the-ground chain of command in the venues will handled for the day-to-day operations by London 2012's venue manager. There will also be a G4S chain of command for the private security and a military chain of command which will be coordinated.

Tasks will be divided into chunks so that, for example, a vehicle check area at the Olympic Park would be handled by the military alone while it is possible that a screening area at the mountain biking venue in Hadleigh in Essex may be a role for G4S staff.

Mr Deighton said: "If there is an incident, we switch to another protocol which hands management to the police. It is the normal incident event management control in the UK."

Anyone going to the Games will be able to spot the military security from what they are wearing, according to Mr Deighton, who rejected the idea that it could feel oppressive.

"You will know they are in the military," he said.

"Wimbledon is the example that I use. When you go to those places and see those guys, I think it is great. This is part of our country. They are part of our history and the way they will do the job will be in a very efficient and not intimidating way.

"I actually feel better about the fact that we have the military there... I think it may actually add to the spirit of the occasion."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK

 
 
  • Comments
  • 16
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Kraptonfactor
They're coming to take me away ha ha, hee hee, ho
01:12 PM on 01/27/2012
What a total waste of money in a recession. The people who are attending this event are so elitist, let them provide their own security, we can't afford it.
10:39 AM on 01/27/2012
GET IN THE QUEUE FOLKS!!!!!! Blacks,immigrants, illegal foreigners,then if any jobs left WHITE BRITISH!!!!!.
09:56 AM on 01/27/2012
you just know the mess that this is going to end up in, Already they need twice the amount of security they orginally thought they would. Already the billions they thought it would cost has gone up treble. And will most liely end up six fold if we the tax payers are lucky i will stick with my orginal cost of £ 20 billion even though i would like to think that is all it will come to over the next few decades. because the costs don"t end when the games end. Already the ticketing system has been a complete farce, and of course ticketmaster who use there black market site getmein will flood tickets on there, come april/may. I love sport but not at this cost, with everything else which is going wrong in this country
01:12 AM on 01/27/2012
I will only apply if I can work for nothing !,otherwise I am not interested.
This comment has been removed.
09:38 PM on 01/26/2012
What worries me is the 'screening process' , will it be as lax as that for SIA approval or will it take as long as the 9 months it took for my ex?
I think that I will not be in London for this sad event, funded by such companies a sDow who own Union Carbide and refuse to accept their responsibilities, today a meber of the London Organising Committee quit because of the involvement of dow
10:00 PM on 01/26/2012
Dow bought the company after the event took place, so how are they responsible?
10:27 PM on 01/26/2012
They bought the company, knowing the results of that companies actions, they bought the 'good stuff' , they also took on the burden of the 'bad stuff'.
Pehaps there should be no liability for the previous actions, just grabbing the benefits of those previous bad actions, not very fair really, taking the money and running, leaving behind generations to suffer.
This comment has been removed.
08:48 PM on 01/26/2012
There is a job for the 3000 MOD staff,
soon to be made redundant.
wes
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
Mickey Mouse 1
There are no lies or deceit on a chess board.
06:22 PM on 01/26/2012
The Olympic games is an obvious target for nutters and I wouldn't feel safe with such a large concentration of people all in one place. If I watched it at all it would be on television, well away from danger.
This comment has been removed.