Stephen Hester To Waive £1m Bonus Payment From RBS

Stephen Hester

The Huffington Post UK   First Posted: 29/01/2012 22:17 Updated: 30/01/2012 17:02

Royal Bank of Scotland chief executive Stephen Hester is to waive his 2011 bonus, the bank said on Sunday night.

In doing so, Hester will not take shares worth almost £1m. Labour had planned to stage a parliamentary vote calling for Hester to be stripped of the money had he chosen to keep it.

The decision comes after a weekend of intense pressure on Mr Hester after the bank's chairman, Sir Philip Hampton, announced he would waive his payout.

RBS is 83 per cent owned by the taxpayer after the government had to step in to rescue the bank following the financial crisis of 2008.

Sir Philip, chairman of RBS since 2009, had been on course to claim 5.17m shares in the financial institution in February, but it is thought he told the bank's remuneration committee it would "not be appropriate" for him to take a £1.4m payout.

Hester was awarded £963,000 last week in a short-term bonus equalling 3.6m shares.

The decision was welcomed by Chancellor George Osborne last night.

"This is a sensible and welcome decision that enables Stephen Hester to focus on the very important job he has got to do, namely to get back billions of pounds of taxpayers' money that was put into RBS," he said.

Labour had planned to force a Commons vote with party sources claiming David Cameron's "failure of leadership" could not be allowed to stand.

Ed Miliband said Hester had done the right thing.

"It is a shame that a feeble, out of touch David Cameron did not realise he should do the right thing and stand up for the interests of the British people," he said.

"Labour was right to seek a parliamentary vote on this so that the people's voice could be heard. But the debate about fair executive pay and responsible capitalism is only just beginning. We need a government that will tax bankers' bonuses and bring responsibility to the boardroom."

Following Hester's decision to turn down the bonus, shadow business secretary Chuka Umunna said it would be wrong to criticise him for having listened to the public outcry.

"For somebody to listen and respond, we of course wouldn't criticise that he's doing the right thing," he said.

"It's a shame that the government having gone around lecturing shareholders in other large companies to take an active role in bringing about wage restraint chose to sit on its hands in this case and that it took so long for there to be a public clamour and row of this order for the change in position that we have just witness to take place.

"It kind of says something, if you like, of the government talking the talk but not walking the walk."

Hester is still expected to be entitled to another shares bonus that could potentially reach £6.4m based on a long term incentive scheme that is approaching the point at which it can come into effect.

Reported by the Press Association, Chairman of the Financial Services Authority Lord Turner, who said last week that excessive bonuses are "not good for society", will report to the Commons Treasury Committee on RBS tomorrow.

Scottish First Minister Alex Salmond said both the coalition government and previous Labour government shared responsibility for the situation.

"Labour negotiated the very deal with Stephen Hester that they have complained about while the coalition parties huff and puff about shareholder democracy but stand by idly when they carry responsibility for the public shareholding," he said.

"They also have the option of a further tax on bonuses but instead all the Tory rhetoric is on reducing the top rate of tax.

"Collectively the Westminster parties display the complete abdication of responsibility of political parties out of touch with the public of both Scotland and England."

However the move was not welcomed by all politicians. Tory MP Mark Field, whose constituency includes the City of London, claimed Hester had been the victim of a "lynch mob".

The unexpected decision comes despite backing from the government, with chief secretary to the Treasury Danny Alexander saying on Sunday that paying Hester's bonus was "protecting the taxpayer".

Reports suggested that had the pressure continued, Hester may have resigned his position. However, by waiving the payout that now looks unlikely.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK

Royal Bank of Scotland chief executive Stephen Hester is to waive his 2011 bonus, the bank said on Sunday night. In doing so, Hester will not take shares worth almost £1m. Labour had planned to s...
Royal Bank of Scotland chief executive Stephen Hester is to waive his 2011 bonus, the bank said on Sunday night. In doing so, Hester will not take shares worth almost £1m. Labour had planned to s...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 156
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
09:45 AM on 02/04/2012
I'm glad that this was waived, but still, nearly a million is absurd, especially in todays climate. If Shakespeare was alive today, he wouldn't have said kill all the laywers, but all the bank bosses! Sad Times....
09:56 PM on 01/30/2012
Milliband calls Cameron feeble . What a joke he is.
If I was Hester I would walk away and let them find somebody else.
This comment has been removed.
12:41 PM on 01/30/2012
This is outrageous!! The man had a contract with specific goals set. He achieved 70% of them and got 60% of his bonus, and has made our state owned bank a better prospect than it was! What right do politicians have to pressurise anybody to 'refuse' a bonus. They wanted to vote to take it away. If they had... it would be THEFT. If my local MP stopped my bonus I'd sue the bas***d!! They have no right whatsoever, especially Labour... who put the contract together in the first place.
All of you who earn a bonus, no matter how small or large... put yourself in Hester's position and see how you would feel if you were 'forced' to give it up.
If he now decided to leave.. no one else with the capability would take the job.
And before everyone starts yelling at me for being a tory banker lover... I'm a pensioner, living in a council house who used to earn a reasonable bonus from time to time through my expertise and hard graft.
04:38 PM on 01/30/2012
Ask yourself was it fair to let a lot off the smaller banks to go under in the banking crisis,
we who had modest shares in these banks lost everthing, but as a tax payer I was'nt asked if we should bail out the big banks, if allowed to go under all the top bankers would have lost millions in shares becoming worthless.
So who's better off me who lost a modest £1000-00 who has worked hard as a self-employed carpenter and recieved no state help what so ever or the banker who gave up a £1.000,000 bonus but in the long run has been saved millions in pension and shares, that by rights should have been lost when the bank should have gone under.
Pensioner who does'nt live in sudsidies housing but has struggled to buy own home.
12:34 PM on 01/30/2012
The 5th imperative of Leadership is Example. Mr Hester should not have waited for "pressure" from politicians or anybody else before deciding. He should never have even considered taking a bonus.
12:59 PM on 01/30/2012
I take it you don't get a bonus at/for work?
This is an indicator to 'bosses' throughout the land that says you can put pressure on employees to 'give-up' their bonus payments. Pandora's box???
12:30 PM on 01/30/2012
Just imagine getting a bonus for making 3.500 people redundant, any one off the street could have done that,every working day millions of people get up early spend hours in traffic to and from work just to help their families servive and in many circumstances have not had a pay rise but had to accept a pay cut,there is no equality or fairness with this government, if austerity measures are in place it should apply to every,if pay cuts are applied they should apply to every one,it seems there is one law for one, and one law for another.
01:02 PM on 01/30/2012
...and hundreds of thousands of those people who spend hours in traffic to and from work are on a bonus or commission scheme!!! Especially production / sales people who are keeping many a company from going under. I guess you'd want to take their bonus off them and watch the companies go down wouldn't you?? There's good news for the unemployment figures!
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Lawyer13
retired Lawyer, General and Psychiatric Nurse, wit
12:25 PM on 01/30/2012
At last he has done the right thing, but I can not help but feel he did not jump he was pushed
12:44 PM on 01/30/2012
If you are really a lawyer... tell me where it says in law that a contracted bonus can be 'stolen' by those who shout and bray loud enough!???
01:26 PM on 01/30/2012
I think you don't understand that in this case the bonus was discretionary - the bonus could have been removed by the board - he had no contractual right to it.

I think it may be worth you reading up on this particular case a bit more...
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Lawyer13
retired Lawyer, General and Psychiatric Nurse, wit
01:36 PM on 01/30/2012
In contract law nowhere, but morally he was right and you can forgo a bonus if you chose to.
11:54 PM on 01/31/2012
Quite rightly so! Still can't stand the chap.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Lawyer13
retired Lawyer, General and Psychiatric Nurse, wit
09:49 AM on 02/01/2012
You can have a second fan for this post. Good luck to you.
12:24 PM on 01/30/2012
He should take his bonus. Where do we draw the line. He agreed his contract and it should be honoured. My husband works on a bonus payment. Does that mean that if anyone is against the bonus he shouldn't get paid. Everyone who works on bonus pay look out. Apparently your signed work contract isn't worth the paper it is written on.
02:33 PM on 01/30/2012
Nothing new there then. lol
12:23 PM on 01/30/2012
A few weeks ago Teaching staff were on strike because the Government wanted to "Move the Goalpost" in their contracts with regards to pensions. Yet now it seems that people want the government to move the goalposts in this contract in respect of bonus's. While I agree that this is obscene, it does not alter the fact that Stephen Hester's contract was drawn up, scrutinised and signed as agreed by the then Labour government. Rules for one and not the other. Let the Members of Parliment lead by example. Initiate a 15% cut on all back office civil servants (Including ministers) earning over £100,000 gross. Initiate a 20% cut back on back office civil servants earning over. Then issue a 7.5% pay rise to all frontline service staff (Nurses, Firemen, Police, Ambulance, etc)
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Lawyer13
retired Lawyer, General and Psychiatric Nurse, wit
12:28 PM on 01/30/2012
Good idea, but your maths will not work out I'm afraid, you want to give away more than you would save.
12:17 PM on 01/30/2012
Stephen Hester is doing a good job in sorting out RBS, in the longer term this will actually incress the value of The Bank, as it is 83% owned by us this means we will have an asset with a far higher value than when The Government bought in.

Whilst the bonus culture is obscene I believe that in this case the added value Stephen Hester has brought to RBS far and away outstrips the bonus he will receive. It will be paid in shares the value of these are directly influenced by Mr Hester's decisions.

It seems absurd, but as a Socialist I actually support his bonus. At least he is doing a good job and has credibility. I hate the system, the greed culture which has poisoned our society but tinkering with a corrupt and immoral system or using individuals as scapegoats when their only course of action is to operate within the system is cowardice. The problem is simple, more people want what Stephen Hester has than want to change the system which allows such things to occur.
04:45 PM on 01/30/2012
If you think thats true how much did the tax payer make on the sale of Nothern Rock to Virgin?
06:02 PM on 01/30/2012
This has nothing to do with Stephen Hester. It is just part of short term, shorted sighted, sell off the silver mentality of a Thatcherite loving government.
12:16 PM on 01/30/2012
dont panic folks he refused this time but next time when theres 6million om the table he wont refuse but accept and resign which will then increase his bonus to probably 10 million with serverence pay.its all a con this government wants us to believe they doing the right thing in the mean time they negotaiting new deals to pay other bankers hugh amounts and dont forget the next PM who resigns or leave his post will be given a cushy job with with of these banks i can see next in line is tory MP Mark field.they all at it like it every one of them and yes look at the pittance
the banks are offering when you incouraged to save.
12:11 PM on 01/30/2012
Mr Milliband fails to mention it was Labour who drew up Mr Hester's Employment Contract which legally entitled him to this bonus ..

He and the entire board of RBS should resign - either a legal contract means something or it doesn't - its that simple
12:22 PM on 01/30/2012
Economists with experience in these matters are telling us that the contract is flexible and allows for changes to made as circumstances alter.
Don't you think its getting a little bit boring now ..still trying to blame Labour for everything. Yea they made huge mistakes and are to blame for a lot of what happened but the Tories need to get a grip and start taking responsibility.
I seem to remember them howling louder than anyone for de-regulation of the banks... Gordon Brown should never have allowed it but he paid the price at the last election, rightly so.
Now the Tories need to sort it out that's what we elected a new government for...the way they are still trying to live in the past is not helping.
12:39 PM on 01/30/2012
A Contract of Employment is flexible IF BOTH PARTIES are agreeable to any changes - it cannot be altered by one party only - if your employer promises you bonus for achieving certain targets that is legally binding - you may chose not to accept the bonus but they cannot simply decide to refuse it .

Last year a banker in a German bank operating in the UK succesfully sued his wemployer for £6.7 million bonus the bank refused to pay - the court upheld his claim , they also had to pay £1.3 milion in legal costs ..- There are some bankers currently suing another bank Commerz Bank for £400 million promised but not paid - deals are meant to be honoured - they will win in Court

Even if your employer only offers you a £5 bonus the principle is exactly the same the same - if you earned the bonus by achieving the target they have to deliver what you were promised.

I would like to think Mr Hester and the entire RBS Board would resign on the point of principle - legal contracts are meant to be binding on all parties - that is their purpose - very simple - if you don't want to deliver on an agreement don't promise one in the first place - Iif I were Mr hester that is what I would do - he has no shortage of alternative jobs - Credit Suisse , a former employer are forever trying
12:34 PM on 01/30/2012
Milliband as usual is talking thru' his nose, if not at the other end. Hester was HEADHUNTED by Gordon Brown, employed by Gordon Brown, given the current contract by Gordon Brown, set targets by Gordon Brown to sort out the RBS mess which came as a result of the Bank of England being stripped of its regulatory powers in 1997 by, guess who, Gordon Brown. Milliband E. hung on to the shirt tails of Gordon Brown so he, and the rest of the cabinet, particularly Ed Balls must have been there when the cabinet approved the expenditure of the £45 billion bail out of RBS. Hester has met his targets, the bank is now showing a good profit, the balance sheet is getting back to sensible levels, and the share price whilst still well below the pre crash level is solid and will grow. I don't agree with the level of income bankers get but in the real world you have to pay the market price. If the moaners found a work colleague was earning 30% more than they were they would be the first to claim parity, or more likely go on strike! Hester can't do that, but he could walk away, we should all pray that he's got the balls to face the criticism down and carries on with the excellent job he is doing.
01:02 PM on 01/30/2012
My view is very simple - Employment Contracts are meant to be kept by both parties regardless as to who drew up the deal at the outset - you signed the deal when you took the job - you expect the employer to honour their side of the bargain they freely entered into - whether it was Brown, Balls or Cameron the principle is the same .

Mr Hester and the entire RBS Board should resign on principle
12:08 PM on 01/30/2012
Does Hester feel he is doing the tax payer a favour by not taking the money what was put into RBS via the tax payer to keep it afloat.
No doubt he and the other sc** bags will get the money via other means soon enough, once the dust settles.
Another disconcerted nobody !!!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
ideaville
I have sexdaily, I mean dyslexia, Danm!
12:04 PM on 01/30/2012
It must be nice to be in a position to turn down close to a million, just to look like a nice guy.
The real issue is that the banks, even in a time of recession, are able to make these huge amounts of money without actually providing any kind of benefit to the average person, borrowing for the banks has never been cheaper and yet credit has never been more expense or harder to get.
What we should have had when RBS, was bailed out was a bank belonging to the people, for the people instead of an investment we may never see a return on.
12:02 PM on 01/30/2012
Bankers have 1m+ a year wages so why do they get bonuses that not only get near their yearly wage but in many cases surpass? Is the massive wage not supposed to be enough ffs? Thats why their wage is so high there should be no bonuses at all! Dont forget they have a number of people to delegate most of their work so the running of the business on a day to day basis would rarely need tweaked by the big wage earning bosses! Its a joke customers get a pittance for saving!