Stephen Hester Bonus: William Hague Says More Could Be Done To Curb Payout Culture

Stephen Hester Bonus

First Posted: 30/01/2012 09:23 Updated: 30/01/2012 09:23

William Hague has hinted the government could do more “as and when necessary” to curb the banking sector's bonus culture, after RBS chief Stephen Hester turned down his £963,000 payout.

The foreign secretary said Hester’s decision was “sensible and welcome” and stressed the government had made “changes” to rein in high pay.

"I don't think we should rule out doing more as and when necessary”, he told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme.

Labour’s shadow business secretary Chuka Umunna compared staff in the majority taxpayer owned bank to other public sector workers facing a pay cap.

"We are not opposed to the concept of a bonus. But this is a time when people listening to this programme are facing the biggest squeeze on their incomes in a generation, not least other. and I use that word deliberately, other public sector workers are being forced to take a 1 per cent pay increase cap on their salaries.That's the big issue here,” he told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme on Monday.

But Tory MP Mark Field hit out at the “lynch mob mentality” surrounding Hester’s payout.

“Its pretty unedifying watching politicians doing it, actually, I don't like to see political figures jumping on a particular bandwagon to kick the guy," he told BBC Radio 5 Live on Monday morning.

The Telegraph reports the Treasury could have clawed back £500,000 of the £963,000 bonus in tax.

Labour leader Ed Miliband has said the row is indicative of David Cameron’s "failure of leadership". The party had been planning to force a vote in parliament on Hester’s bonus.

Chuka Umunna: Other public sector workers facing pay freeze
1  of  5
PLAY
FULLSCREEN
ZOOM
SHARE THIS SLIDE 
"We are not opposed to the concept of a bonus. But this is a time when people listening to this programme are facing the biggest squeeze on their incomes in a generation, not least other, and I use that word deliberately, other public sector workers are being forced to take a 1% pay increase cap on their salaries.That's the big issue here."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK POLITICS

William Hague has hinted the government could do more “as and when necessary” to curb the banking sector's bonus culture, after RBS chief Stephen Hester turned down his £963,000 payout. The fo...
William Hague has hinted the government could do more “as and when necessary” to curb the banking sector's bonus culture, after RBS chief Stephen Hester turned down his £963,000 payout. The fo...
Filed by Dina Rickman  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 40
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
06:37 PM on 01/30/2012
Why on earth do they announce the level of Bonuses before the release of the 'End of Year Results' which in the case of banks is not until the end of February. High bonuses might be easier to (almost) accept if the banks can show signs of a significant improvement from last year and also show that they have met their lending targets. Again, the problem arises that they will be equally well villified if they announce hugh profits which the public would claim had been created at the public's expense. In addition, why are we only concerened about Bankers Bonuses. Ask yourself some simple questions, which of the following are you generally most content with: Your bank, I am. Your Local Supermarket, I'm not, ripped off by a CEO whose bonuses pale the Bankers into insignificance. Your Local Petrol Station, I'm not, ripped off more than your local supermarket and OIL CEO bonuses that you can't even begin to imagine. And what about yor SKY subscriptions, you know, that provided by almost the richest man in the world and little wonder he is. The list is endless, think of some for yourselves whilst you berate the Bankers. I fully appreciate that a £1M on top of a paid £1M is grotesque but there are plenty worse culprits who seem to have gone under the Radar.

Christ!!! It's only money.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fredro
04:26 PM on 01/30/2012
Not COULD do more, Mr Hague: SHOULD do more.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Carl Baron
03:34 PM on 01/30/2012
Might I suggest you put your own house in order Mr Hague, before you criticize working Bankers?

Your Government should set a better example than allowing MP’s to fiddle their Income Tax such as with David Miliband MP who is allegedly using a loophole in law to get £21,000 a day through a controversial tax loophole. Details are here: @ http://nowtweet.it/pct

At least the Bankers are doing a job of work, which is more than can be honestly said about those in the House of commons from >Joe Public's< point of view that is.

Signed Carl Barron Chairman of agpcuk
http://car­­l-agpcuk.­l­ivejourn­al­.com/
10:44 AM on 02/01/2012
Good gawd, I just checked that link out Carl, Labour are definitely the new Conservatives.
03:07 PM on 01/30/2012
Another thing to think about...when Darling ( the Labour money man at No 11) appointed Hestor, why wasnt his contract made somewhat clearer to the public at that time, that he would be getting a bonus if he performed, so we're not all having this debate. Another loada spin from Labour by keeping it quiet and bitching now....typical !!!
03:00 PM on 01/30/2012
Congratulations Huff post...yet again...you have failed to print my comments ....AGAIN !!! Did you work for Pravda at any time
04:32 PM on 01/30/2012
Huffpost is left wing, anti free speech and pro Scotland.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:42 PM on 02/01/2012
And your a complete ..Dick...
02:29 PM on 01/30/2012
Am I missing something? As far as I am aware Labour signed this agreement. I also believe that a contract (agreed by the government at the time) is legally binding. Consequently if it was revoked we could be sued (remember Shoesmith) and we would lose. If you want the best guys running your business then you have to pay its as simple as that. When were talking about a bank that could lose us billions then I would prefer to pay twice this as bonus if hes the right man for the job and protects our financial interests. Most people probably can't get these vast amounts of money into their heads, which is fine, but don't complain that some earn more than others. Thats just life.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fredro
04:34 PM on 01/30/2012
'voiceofreason098'? Might I suggest 'proportion' be considered. When the contract was signed, it was assumed (a) that the economy was on the up (b) that the bank was now virtually nationalised (c) that usual considerations of company-improvement determine whether salaries/bonuses go up or down, not least, it being mostly state-owned now, in line with the national state of affairs. The latter is catastrophic, and the bank, while it has improved, has done so within the cosy cushion of mainly state-ownership (i.e. bail-out guaranteed in case of failure), and, compared with the proposed salaries/bonuses, modestly.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Allyb999
02:12 PM on 01/30/2012
What did they do to curb the huge bonus culture? Ermmmm nothing did Cameron not just say a couple of days ago it was the RBS boss's choice. Thats showing them.
02:32 PM on 01/30/2012
I was under the impression that it was a legally binding contract? Wouldnt you want your agreed and signed bonus if you hit the agreed targets? I know I would. I agree it is RBS choice to make the final decision thats why they have a CEO. Most complain when the government get too involved in business but on this occasion theyve made the right decision.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Allyb999
02:39 PM on 01/30/2012
I have a legal and binding contract with the government over my pension scheme, but that made no difference to the government when they changed it.
02:02 PM on 01/30/2012
i love ed silliman.. he comes on the news congratulating himself and the labour party on forcing steven hester to give up his banking bonus .. it was the labour party that offered him the bonuses as part of his contract in 2009 to help pull rbs out of the s..t ..after labour watched rbs get themseves there in in the first place, not only do they make a dodgy deal ..but they congratulate themselves on national tv for reneging on it .. priceless
02:33 PM on 01/30/2012
well put
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fredro
04:40 PM on 01/30/2012
You forget one significant factor, geezer726. The population....kind of....elected a Coalition Government, which has/has had policies diametrically opposite to Labour's, and which have kept growth at almost zero, increased unemployment, and generally made national conditions more Scroogey. Not forgetting the fact that the world situation has not improved much, especially in the EU, and RBS is an international bank (even if mostly owned by the British taxpayer).
01:40 PM on 01/30/2012
"William Hague Says More Could Be Done To Curb Payout Culture"

Then bloody well do it, you are in Government.... not the public and lil' ol' me!
northern git
fed up with all the political crap in life
04:25 PM on 01/30/2012
and if the government want to do something bold and curb excesses, including their own, then the public will back them. if not come next election the public will sack them.
I am not takingbets on what happens next, unless it is a general election
01:34 PM on 01/30/2012
William Hague has hinted the government could do more “as and when necessary” to curb the banking sector's bonus culture?

Anything would be more as they have not done anything yet other than allow the bloke to be brow-beaten by one and all into a decision that should never have been his for the taking!
Ineffectual to a fault these Tories unless it involves the sick, elderly, infirm or everyday folk who can be sacrificed on the financial alter.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Norman Mitchison
01:31 PM on 01/30/2012
Start by disbanding all quangos,subsidised bars and restaurants in Parliament,free MPs jaunts abroad and make Nick Clegg redundant. That should save millions and show willing.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Allyb999
02:13 PM on 01/30/2012
5.8 million alone in subsidising them to eat and drink. Beyond a joke.
01:22 PM on 01/30/2012
I have just been thakfully reminded that the only people who spend hours going to and from work in traffic jams are,chief execs, reps who are keeping the company afloat,well who are the millions of other people.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Norman Mitchison
01:06 PM on 01/30/2012
Its only fair that they want to be as rich as Blair and Huhne ,but by working for it.
northern git
fed up with all the political crap in life
01:21 PM on 01/30/2012
not really they want to be as rich as Blair -period
01:00 PM on 01/30/2012
It's a bit hypocritical of MP's to complain about bonuses, when many of them are millionaires. They didn't become millionaires from being MP's, but earnt their money in previous careers or inherited it. Many MP's were traders or Bankers before they went into politics and were paid massive bonuses.
02:19 PM on 01/30/2012
a lot of conservative mps come from a business background and know how to run a successful business. that means they know how to get the best out of the budgets and boundaries which are set by real life constraints. labour politicians are generally doctors solicitors teachers .the types who have never had to run a budget for anything. just spend spend spend . thats how we`ve got here and thats how we`re going to get our country back in the black
10:49 AM on 02/01/2012
Cameron's father was a banker.
northern git
fed up with all the political crap in life
12:55 PM on 01/30/2012
I will try this one more time

Hague thinks that by saying the coalition can do more, that it will win them votes, it is a simple as that. I may be a cynic but his time am sure that the government and banks are so in league they forget whose benefit they are supposed to be there for.
Niether banker nor politician hves to wonder how the next bill will get paid.
Why then, given the public hatred to these charlatan and thieves in suits not give their bonuses, publicly, to charities.
Or would that show a hint of decency
02:31 PM on 01/30/2012
when a person goes to work,its up to an employer to set the wage...plus offer a bonus if he thinks its merited. if the potential employeee thinks thats fair he accepts ..if he doesnt he goes and sells his time and skills elsewhere. i understand bankers whose banks owe money to the government should consider thier pay and bonus levels and behave according to the reality of the people paying thier wages..but for banks who owe the government nothing.. its entirely there business what they can afford to pay themselves and the employees and nothing to do with any government.