UniLad Suspends Website Following Outrage Over 'Surprise' Rape Article

Huffington Post UK   First Posted: 01/02/2012 12:55 GMT Updated: 04/12/2012 10:55 GMT

UPDATE: UniLad CEO Jamie Street faces disciplinary action from his university.

An online magazine aimed at university students has suspended its activity following a backlash over the publication of a controversial and derogatory article about rape victims.

On Tuesday the National Union of Students (NUS) called for the website UniLad, which claims to be the "number one university student lad's magazine and guide to getting laid" to be pulled down over the article.

In an article titled "Sexual Mathematics" it stated: "If the girl you've taken for a drink... won't 'spread for your head', think about this mathematical statistic: 85% of rape cases go unreported.

"That seems to be fairly good odds."

The writer then adds at the bottom of the piece: "Uni Lad does not condone rape without saying 'surprise'."

The article sparked outrage on Twitter, including a comment from Lib Dem MP Jo Swinson, who said "Do the people at UniLad really think this infantile drivel passes for journalism?"

On Wednesday all content appeared to have been removed from the UniLad website and replaced with a statement apologising for the article.

"We would like to make a public apology as it appears that some of the content previously published on this site has caused some distress," it says.

"The content in question was un-called for and should in no way have been published, and we can assure you it will never happen again. Any grief this may have caused you, we apologise for. We took things too far.

"Any flippant comments that may have been said during discussions, I also apologise for, it will not happen again. We are certainly going to be cleaning up our act on unilad.com.

It added that the site will return "in a few weeks".

UniLad, a money-generating website that sells merchandise, has nearly 70,000 "likes" on Facebook and more than 2,000 followers on Twitter and claims to have an average daily visit count of 8,000.

Bookmakers William Hill, who previously had a banner advert on the site, told the Huffington Post UK that they "would not be returning" to the site following the controversy.

Previously one Twitter user, Sarah McAlpine (@sazza_jay) was asked if she was a "dyke" after questioning the magazine over the comments.

McAlpine replied: "Obviously you know you did wrong or you wouldn't have amended the article. You are not saving face by harrassing me."

UniLad then continued: "We know we did wrong and it has been removed. That wasn't harassment, it was a question.

McAlpine, a recent graduate from Kent University, said she found the site "almost laughable".

"It's a 101 for misogyny. It seems to be run by a group of infantile boys caught up in a relentless willy waving contest, measured by how horrible you are to women."

The website, which says it was founded by "Alex Partridge" does include one "top wench" Lorna Naylor - although she wrote articles such as the one pictured above, titled "The Problem With Slags".

She tweeted one writer for PR company esPResso saying: "nothing i have written has been controversial".

Another writer, Jack-William Cantwell, emailed Huffington Post UK claiming he had been "inactive with the company for around five months". He had described himself on Twitter as a writer for Uni Lad, although this has now been removed.

National Women's Officer for the NUS Estelle Hart has called for the entire website to be shut down for its "misogyny".

"Words cannot describe my anger at seeing this website. These pathetic attempts at humour feed into a view in society that women are to blame for the violence committed against them.

"The casual trivialisation of rape suggests it is something other than a despicable violent crime and whilst I'm reluctant to give this website the oxygen of publicity we cannot let them get away with such degrading attitudes towards women.

"Removing one vile comment from the site barely scratches the surface of its misogyny. The whole site should be taken down until they have radically over-hauled their editorial policy."

"Jake Gallagher", (@ChefJake_) is one of the more prolific writers on the site. His articles include "How to pull a fresher" which begins: "Fresher girls are especially vulnerable".

CORRECTION: We apologise for previously describing Street as "creator". We have now amended the description to "CEO".
FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK UNIVERSITIES & EDUCATION

 
 
  • Comments
  • 9
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
09:25 AM on 02/04/2012
@ Cargill "If you find it offensive, keep it to yourself." For starters, we are in a free country, I wasnt aware we were in some backward cesspit, so why should we keep it to ourselves? "As if anyone would read said article and then proceed to rape someone because of it" Secondly this is an indictable offense so should never be trivialized. By that logic of lightening up perhaps we should approve of racist or genocidal 'jokes lol' too? While most people may not go off and commit it, by making light of it, you still damage attitudes towards this serious problem at the very least.
10:42 PM on 02/01/2012
calm the F*** down people.... anything can be joked about. If you don't find something funny, don't laugh. If you find it offensive, keep it to yourself. As if anyone would read said article and then proceed to rape someone because of it, have some faith in the average intelligence of people. Look at the comedian Jimmy Carr, he says some pretty outrageous things but nobody bitches ('scuse my french) about him... well, except the bible-bashers of course.
11:51 PM on 02/08/2012
The difference is, there are jokes that aren't funny because they're bad jokes, and there are jokes that aren't funny because they add, and encourage horrendous acts, in this instance rape. There is a difference between lack of humor, racism, and misogyny.

If you honestly believe that the quote from unilad was "no big deal" and people are getting butthurt over something silly, you are pretty much saying that you think rape is no big deal and a woman deserves it, which essentially gives the impression that you have a mindset much like a rapist; that the woman probably deserved it, and she should stop complaining and just take it because it is what she was built for, to be his sex machine. In case you weren't aware, that is absolutely disgusting.
05:04 PM on 02/01/2012
I wonder if whoever wrote that rape article would find the prospect so funny or appealing if he had a 'taste of his own medicine'.

Vile.
05:01 PM on 02/01/2012
The new age of Book Burners !!!!
05:52 PM on 02/01/2012
Criticizing hate speech =/= censorship, dear.
10:44 PM on 02/01/2012
explain to me how it is hate speech.
07:43 PM on 02/01/2012
Bad analogy. Nobody censored or suppressed them. All that happened was a lot of people drawing attention to what they had done (and taking screengrabs before stuff was hastily deleted).

William Hill pulled their advertising. Then UniLad voluntarily took their own site down, promising a change of content. Nobody else did it to them.

Freedom of speech cuts both ways.
photo
vividrick
I came, I saw...I had a cup of tea!
01:44 PM on 02/01/2012
Good! Shame on you 'UniLad'!