RBS Chairman Sir Philip Hampton Admits Bankers Get Paid Too Much

Sir Philip Hampton

First Posted: 3/02/2012 09:09 Updated: 3/02/2012 09:19   PA

Bankers' pay is too high and needs to be "corrected", the chairman of the Royal Bank of Scotland Sir Philip Hampton said today.
But Sir Philip said that, relative to other bankers, the rewards offered to RBS chief executive Stephen Hester - who last week waived a £1 million bonus after coming under extreme public and political pressure - were not high.

Mr Hester, who took over as chief executive after the Government bailed out the near-bankrupt RBS in 2008, was doing a "great job" in turning the bank around and protecting the taxpayer's 83% investment in the business, he said.

Sir Philip, who himself turned down a £1.4 million bonus earlier this month, confirmed that he had signed off Mr Hester's proposed package of £963,000 worth of RBS shares - which was 60% of the maximum he could have received under a performance-related scheme - and admitted the RBS board "under-estimated" the public outrage which it would provoke.

He denied that he had been swayed by Government pressure to keep the bonus under £1 million and said that it was Hester himself who decided to give up the payout in order to protect his own reputation and that of the bank.

Despite widespread speculation, the RBS board never threatened to resign over the bonus issue, said Sir Philip.

Asked whether he now expected Mr Hester to walk away from his job, he acknowledged that intense scrutiny of his bonus had been "challenging" for the chief executive, but described him as "a tough character" who was "dedicated to turning the business round".

Sir Philip told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: "I think if this bank is fully returned to profitability by an able management team, that is very much in the interests of the British taxpayer. Stephen Hester and his team are, I think, doing a great job.

"I recognise absolutely that some of the pay levels are very high, very difficult for people to understand, but by the standards of this market they are not high."

Sir Philip acknowledged public unease about the scale of rewards across the financial sector.

"Pay has been high for too long, particularly in the banks, particularly in the investment banks," he said. "Shareholders have done pretty badly and employees have done pretty well over the last 10 years.

"That needs to be corrected. It isn't a society or fairness issue, it is a straightforward business issue. Too much of the money is not going to the right place and the shareholder rewards have not been sufficient.

"I think that is in the process of changing now. It's perhaps not changing as quickly as many would like, but it is changing, pay is falling in this industry and has been falling in recent years.

"At some stage, there will be a business correction to bring banker pay properly in line with underlying performance of the business."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK

Bankers' pay is too high and needs to be "corrected", the chairman of the Royal Bank of Scotland Sir Philip Hampton said today. But Sir Philip said that, relative to other bankers, the rewards offere...
Bankers' pay is too high and needs to be "corrected", the chairman of the Royal Bank of Scotland Sir Philip Hampton said today. But Sir Philip said that, relative to other bankers, the rewards offere...
Filed by Stephen Hull  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 36
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
17:38 on 04/02/2012
Bankers pay should be brought in line with other forms of employment, requiering similar levels of time, concentration and expertise. The pay received by a typical Hospital Surgeon who litteraly holds your life in his hands, should never under any circumstances be eclipsed by that of a glorified accountant. Doctors have a responcibility to their customers which is of far greater significance than any other form of employment in existance. They deserve to be paid well and they deserve more than they currently get. Bankers on the other hand are nothing more than leaches, sucking the life out of society !.
11:05 on 04/02/2012
Sorry - I meant Hampton not Hester - too angry to get it right!!!
11:03 on 04/02/2012
Shareholders & employees? What about the investors?? What about the people who have savings and pensions? You make NO MENTION of us Hester. No.....we don't even showup on your radar do we?
08:21 on 04/02/2012
The problem is quite simple. The Board receive bonuses so they are obviously going to ramp up executive bonuses to justify their own.

The Board should be made up of shareholders and since they will receive dividends on their shares there is asolutely no need for them to receive bonuses. They might then be prepared to pay bigger dividends which in turn will restore more confidence to the markets.

The present system is one of sheer greed. Once the no bonus for Board members principle is applied we will see an end to these ludicrous payments for failure.
16:43 on 04/02/2012
Quote: "The Board should be made up of shareholde­rs"

It already is.
00:12 on 04/02/2012
They have to get paid that much to keep london cocaine dealers in nice cars, the reason 90% of £20 notes have traces of cocaine on them is 'vault parties' the bankers throw in bonus season.
23:08 on 03/02/2012
The time has to come when the top wage is linked to the minimum wage. Ten times sounds about right to most of us. The people with "Talent" worth more than that can always go abroad and earn it there.
photo
WaveRhydr
DIEBOLD-WE VOTE SO YOU DONT HAVE TO
02:26 on 04/02/2012
He_ll no. Dont you send them to the USA. We have more than we know what to do with.
22:38 on 03/02/2012
Talk is cheap! Having got £millions for just doing their jobs, are any of them actually going to sit back and let others take it away from them. I think not.
Whatever the problem or target there is always a way to solve it or in the case of a target to reach it.
The only difficulty is in finding that way.
There is a clear need to find the way to bring the top salaries of bankers, footballers, BBC staff, etc. in line to what is morally and decently acceptable to us all.
Ideas on the back of a postage stamp please.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
00:38 on 04/02/2012
The solution is simple. If people withdraw from using banks, going to matches in droves with season tickets, stop watching the television and paying the t.v. license and buying every new item of technology which appears on the market, aka supply and demand, the money withdrawn would soon be a drain on the enormous salaries of the OVERPAID in society. I rest my case?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:43 on 04/02/2012
Yeh..and id die of boredom...but i agree with your sentiment...hit em were it hurts.
12:14 on 04/02/2012
@Catherine Hester: I quite agree and would certainly not die of boredom, and haven't to date. I can't think of anything more boring than football, TV (I don't pay a license fee because I don't need one), and technology which is redundant before it even hits the high street. As for banks; the biggest scam this planet has ever seen!
19:39 on 03/02/2012
Yes they are paid too much, to me any argument against is a load of testicles.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Norman Mitchison
19:23 on 03/02/2012
They do. So do NHS managers,Civil Servants and MPs. Quangos and unwarranted ,and ignored , : surveys, and other `think tanks` are a drain on the economy.and should be abolished. II they want to publish their views, let them pay for them ,and see how many opt out.
19:07 on 03/02/2012
What he means is, idiots are paid too much.
18:09 on 03/02/2012
Don't worry Sir Philip Hampton your in a good club -- you'v also got the overpayed politicions, the overpayed footballers, the know it all overpayed experts, the overpayed do gooders, and the overpayed politicaly correct twits.-- So your not alone.
17:22 on 03/02/2012
Lets put this in its proper perspective,any one who has done a good job for their company deserves being congratulate with some sort of bonus,our refuge collectors, people in our town halls, wagon drivers,people working in our local banks,refinery workers, and every one else that contributes to our ecconomy, where it is not fair or equal is if all those people i have mentioned and more are having not to get an increase in their saleries they are in many cases having to take cuts,if we are having to accept austerity measures then it should apply to every one, our polititions seem to ignore that pensioners and the less well paid are being hit the hardest,it seems they are blatently extracting the urine out of the public, when you see MPs fiddling their expenses and cheif execs being grossely over paid as though they are the only ones that work in the company,as regards footballers, the fans are solely to blame for suppoting them, and as far as polititions are concerned we are to blame for electing them, cos every time we fall for the same lies.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Fozwords
Abandon hope when you post on here
19:27 on 03/02/2012
Couldnt agree more, I aint had a rise for 4 years but I am being considered for one this year, now thats motivation. Carry on you jolly bunch of Bankers, sorry that should have been a w.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
meddleman
17:02 on 03/02/2012
Bankers have created their own fantasy world based on ludicrous over-estimates of their own worth. Most of what they think and do is in a virtual world unrelated to that of the rest of the human race.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Fozwords
Abandon hope when you post on here
19:28 on 03/02/2012
Mirror mirror on the wall, who is the best banker of all - Answer well you all deserve big bonuses especially for ripping off the gullible public, ha ha ha
16:14 on 03/02/2012
Whilst I think bankers get paid wages which are too high, just remember most of the Premier League Footballers earn more than £1 million per year just for kick a football about.......and it doesn't matter if they win or loose...
photo
Theatrixnyc
Remember John Lennon:Power To The People!
17:20 on 03/02/2012
So what happens when the Footballer goes the whole season, without ever delivering a score? Does he get a bonus, and re-signed with a higher figure? Or does he get dumped, or traded? The World Economy tanked. Bankers did that. How many lost their jobs? Got demoted? Went without a bonus? Most of them barely blinked...
19:32 on 03/02/2012
No, If he's English he gets picked for the National Team.........
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Fozwords
Abandon hope when you post on here
19:29 on 03/02/2012
Another lot of dossing, flash get arrogant wasters.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Saint wright
Dyslexic old chippy
15:48 on 03/02/2012
David Cameron has called for shareholders of Banks to restrict bonuses paid to Bankers. Yet today we learn that the RBS owned by the taxpayers has made a £17.5 billion loss in share value over the last 12 months was going to pay its Chief Executive £996,000 in bonus shares, notwithstanding his £1.2 million annual salary, which is 46 times greater than the nation’s average salary.
The bonus is 6.6 times greater than we pay Cameron for running the Country, and more than most voters will be worth after a life time of working bloody hard and saving. You know it’s an outrageous scandal when no government minister would talk about the matter to John Humphreys on this morning BBC Today programme, only the Labour shadow minister.

He will also has a another bonus later in the year for up to £4.5 million, will he turn that down as well?