Falkland Islands: Nuclear Submarine Sent By Royal Navy To South Atlantic, According To Reports

Hms Turbulent

PA/The Huffington Post   First Posted: 4/02/2012 09:46 Updated: 4/02/2012 13:01

The Royal Navy is sending a nuclear submarine to the Falkland Islands amid heightened tensions between Britain and Argentina over the disputed islands, it has reported.

The Trafalgar class vessel, thought to be either HMS Tireless or HMS Turbulent, is believed to be being deployed to protect the islands from Argentine military action.

A Ministry of Defence (MoD) spokeswoman said: "We do not comment on submarine deployments."

The Daily Mail reported that the prime minister had personally approved plans for one of the Navy's most sophisticated submarines to undertake the mission.

Sources told the newspaper that a team of Spanish-speaking communications workers would be aboard to monitor maritime radio transmissions in the region.

It is said the submarine will be in the islands' waters in time for April's 30th anniversary of the 1982 war.

The decision to deploy a submarine to the region comes after the Royal Navy confirmed it was sending one of its most advanced warships to patrol the area.

HMS Dauntless, a Type 45 air defence destroyer, is due to replace the older frigate currently on duty, HMS Montrose.

On Friday Prince William arrived on the Falklands as he prepared to begin a tour of duty as an RAF search and rescue pilot.

The MoD said the posting was part of a "routine operational deployment", despite Argentina accusing the prince of arriving as a "conqueror".

Angry scenes broke out in Buenos Aires on Friday, where a group of masked protesters took to the streets and threw paint at a British bank in protest at the prince's deployment.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK

The Royal Navy is sending a nuclear submarine to the Falkland Islands amid heightened tensions between Britain and Argentina over the disputed islands, it has reported. The Trafalgar class vessel, ...
The Royal Navy is sending a nuclear submarine to the Falkland Islands amid heightened tensions between Britain and Argentina over the disputed islands, it has reported. The Trafalgar class vessel, ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 272
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Molly D
09:34 AM on 02/07/2012
One thinks back to the days of Jackie Fischer and WC, when a couple tripod masts on the horizon struck fear and certain destruction into the heart of a real navy, and Argentina was a bystander.
03:56 PM on 02/05/2012
The headline is a tad misleading, because almost all subs are nuclear subs, which means nuclear powered. I imagine there are still a few diesel powered subs out there, but, still misleading.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jacksdad41
Quant Je Puis
06:22 PM on 02/05/2012
All are nuclear powered - 6 Trafalgar class and 1 Astute class known as "fleet submarines" and 4 Vanguard class nuclear powered with nuclear warheads. For 30 years there has always been at least one Vanguard class at sea at all times - They are the UK nuclear deterrent. 7 more astute class are either being built, due to be laid down or have the build date specified.
02:01 PM on 02/05/2012
More made up nonsense from the Daily Fail. AOL should be ashamed of posting such rubbish.
01:30 PM on 02/05/2012
Is it only me, or does this sub seem to be short a few "slates"?
02:29 PM on 02/05/2012
I needed them for my roof...sorry HMS Turbulent.
katertaif
My wife thinks I have one fault. Everything I do!
03:07 PM on 02/05/2012
No, you are not wrong.It's definitely a few tiles short of a submarine
01:16 PM on 02/05/2012
Err! As far as I am aware, I don't think the Royal Navy would advertise (or ever have) where their Nuclear Subs are going. Think about it folks, would you tell or advertise what plans you have to defend yourself? The Argentinians could see it as an act of aggression.
03:36 PM on 02/05/2012
The Argentinians know it anyway, they are not stupid you know. They see as British trying to show off the only way they can really defend the islands, which is by force, because these days not even America or the UN are on British side...I wonder why..
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
10:22 PM on 02/05/2012
The argentinians know there is a submarine somewhere in 20,000 square miles of ocean, but they don't know where.
This comment has been removed.
10:50 AM on 02/05/2012
Sorry should be UK
10:49 AM on 02/05/2012
+Is it extra protection for the golden boy of the JK forces Willie Wales.
10:06 AM on 02/05/2012
how is it that everybody knows what the NAVY is up to,surely this is confidential info.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
andy crapp
10:39 AM on 02/05/2012
Too much freedom of the press and social networking have destroyed any chance of Britain ever being able to sucessfully fighting a war on the scale of WW2.
katertaif
My wife thinks I have one fault. Everything I do!
11:42 AM on 02/05/2012
We couldn't do that anyway andy. We just do not have the resources, or even the national will.
katertaif
My wife thinks I have one fault. Everything I do!
11:39 AM on 02/05/2012
I would agree with you there. One of the problems we have with our freedom of the press, is if we know about it, so do the Argies. Fortunately no one seems to be quite sure, the article is full of if's buts and maybe's. I see derogatory comments about Prince William being there, and the short length of his tour as against the length of other peoples. It seems they forget, or don't want to remember that he has a lot of other official duties to carry out. One of which is sales ambassador to Britain. In this economic climate, we need all the help we can get in that direction.
10:02 AM on 02/05/2012
g
09:46 AM on 02/05/2012
If its a T boat going down there the Argentinians have nothing to worry about because it will never make it. These boats are knackered!
katertaif
My wife thinks I have one fault. Everything I do!
11:44 AM on 02/05/2012
The captain of the Belgrano, thought that 30 years ago. HMS Conqueror said different.
09:23 AM on 02/06/2012
Yeah but the Conq worked!
08:54 AM on 02/05/2012
Come on you Argies, Make My Day
09:54 PM on 02/05/2012
theyve got no chance all talk and no action.
08:40 AM on 02/05/2012
If the theory is that the Flakland Islands belong to Argentina because they are close to them, we might as well say that the Channel Islands are French because they are even closer to France.
08:43 AM on 02/05/2012
Typo sorry........."Falkland Islands"
katertaif
My wife thinks I have one fault. Everything I do!
11:47 AM on 02/05/2012
Very true stu. Mind if they ever find oil in the Channel Islands, I wouldn't be at all surprised to find the froggies claiming them.
12:32 AM on 02/05/2012
well i suppose we better send somthing we aint got an aircraft carrier now to send if we get more cutbacks it will be row boats sent
07:01 AM on 02/05/2012
Yes we have....We have HMS Illustrious.
07:17 AM on 02/05/2012
We do, but we don't have anything very relevant to the defence of the Falklands to operate from it, as the Harriers are no more!
09:49 AM on 02/05/2012
No we dont it was decomissioned!
11:43 PM on 02/04/2012
First, I doubt there has ever been a time since 1983 when there hasn't been at least one hunter-killer sub in the south Atlantic, but just how responsible is it to highlight that now and start speculating (Because speculation is all it is)? The Argies aren't going to do anything, they know full well that any sort of military action would be like poking a stick into a sleeping tiger's ear.