Syria: Russia And China Veto UN Resolution Calling For President Assad To Stand Aside

Syria Un

PA/Huffington Post UK   First Posted: 4/02/2012 17:01 Updated: 4/02/2012 19:54

Russia and China have vetoed a United Nations resolution calling for Syrian President Bashar al-Assad to stand down.

The two permanent members of the Security Council rejected the resolution despite reports of nearly 300 deaths in Homs following a night of shelling by the Syrian army and security forces.

Following the vote, the French ambassador to the UN, Gerard Araud, said: "It is a sad day for the council. It is a sad day for Syria... History has compounded our shame."

Susan Rice, the US ambassador to the UN, called the veto "shameful", adding that Russia and China had sold out the Syrian people in order to "shield a craven tyrant".

The draft resolution called for a "Syrian-led political transition to a democratic, plural political system". However, Russia and China said the draft was "unbalanced".

In reaction to the vote, Britain accused Russia and China of encouraging the Syrian regime's "killing regime".

Foreign Secretary William Hague joined international condemnation of their stance. He said: "Russia and China faced a simple choice today: would they support the people of Syria and the Arab League or not?

"They decided not to, and instead sided with the Syrian regime and its brutal suppression of the Syrian people in support of their own national interests.

"Their approach lets the Syrian people down, and will only encourage President Assad's brutal regime to increase the killing, as it has done in Homs over the past 24 hours."

Hague said the assault on Homs - which has been at the centre of the pro-democracy protests - was "all the more chilling" as it comes on the 30th anniversary of the Hama massacre.

Around 20,000 people died in the 1982 operation by the Syrian army - then under the orders of president Hafez Assad - the father of the present leader.

The UN says around 6,000 people have died so far in the crackdown on protests which began last year.

"More than 2,000 people have died since Russia and China vetoed the last draft resolution in October 2011," said Hague following the vote.

"How many more need to die before Russia and China allow the UN Security Council to act?

"Those opposing UN Security Council action will have to account to the Syrian people for their actions which do nothing to help bring an end to the violence that is ravaging the country.

"The United Kingdom will continue to support the people of Syria and the Arab League to find an end to the violence and allow a Syrian-led political transition."



Russia's ambassador vetos the draft resolution

Russia and China were condemned in a series of outspoken attacks by the other members of the Security Council - with the UK's outrage expressed by its ambassador, Mark Lyall Grant.

The violence had "ferociously escalated" in the last 24 hours, he said, accusing the two nations of failing in their duty.

"Those that blocked Council action today must ask themselves how many more deaths they are prepared to tolerate before they support even modest and measured action," he said.

"We removed every possible excuse. The reality is that Russia and China have today taken a choice: to turn their backs on the Arab world and to support tyranny rather than the legitimate aspirations of the Syrian people.

"They have failed in their responsibility as permanent members of the Security Council and they have done so on the most shameful day of the Syrian killing machine's 300 days of repression."

The draft resolution, tabled by Morocco, did not impose sanctions or authorise military action and contained nothing that warranted opposition, he said.

The Tunisia president announced that it would withdraw its recognition of the Assad's leadership and expel the Syrian ambassador as the anger mounted.

Earlier on Saturday, President Obama called the killing in Homs an "unspeakable assault", while Hague accused the Syrian regime of "cold-blooded cynicism".

Before the vote, the UK Mission to the UN said Security Council members were gathered in the chamber at the organisation's New York headquarters.

"We cannot afford further delay on action on the tragedy," a spokesman said on Twitter.

The ongoing resistance from Russia was expected, with Moscow a long-time ally of Damascus,

Violent protests outside the embassy in Belgrave Square, central London, were mirrored in several countries across Europe and the Middle East - including Libya and Tunisia which have already overthrown regimes in the so-called Arab Spring.

Human rights campaigner Peter Tatchell said: "The UK should expel the Syrian ambassador and press the International Criminal Court to draw up a warrant for the arrest of President Assad on charges of crimes against humanity.

"It is intolerable that we allow the Syrian ambassador to remain in London after this latest massacre of civilians by his government."



Chinese Ambassador to the United Nations Li Baodong sits with his hands down

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK

Russia and China have vetoed a United Nations resolution calling for Syrian President Bashar al-Assad to stand down. The two permanent members of the Security Council rejected the resolution despi...
Russia and China have vetoed a United Nations resolution calling for Syrian President Bashar al-Assad to stand down. The two permanent members of the Security Council rejected the resolution despi...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 100
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
19:55 on 05/02/2012
I wonder how long it takes to moderate a comment???????
21:00 on 06/02/2012
Moderately long, probably.
19:06 on 05/02/2012
It's nearly a year now since the people of Bahrain began protesting and the king requested help from Saudi Arabia who sent in troops to put down the uprising by FORCE....

Even to the point of imprisoning Doctors and Nurses who treated those who the Saudis had wounded........

Where were the West then?

Where was the UN Resolutions then?
15:28 on 05/02/2012
long live President Assad.
get job, keep up the good work.
remember its he's country not ours.people here want to complain. get on a plane and got there
14:23 on 05/02/2012
Just a word about double standards.
The word Hypocrisy is much undervalued by it’s over use these days. But one is left astounded by the comments in the U.N. of U.S. Ambassador Susan Rice, referring to the Russian/Chinese veto of the Syria Resolution!
‘Washington was "disgusted" with vetoes by Russia and China’, she stated. ‘Any further bloodshed that flows will be on their hands..’ and best of all- ‘peoples are entitled to Strive for the same aim of democratic self determination’.

Just a minute! What about Palestine? Isn’t it the U.S. that continually Veto’s resolution condemning the excesses of the Israeli occupiers of that country? The U.S. has shielded Israel for over forty years while the people of Palestine have suffered!
03:51 on 06/02/2012
Here, here - agreed!!
13:23 on 05/02/2012
very 'interesting' article but where do we have to go to find the russian/chinese point of view?
17:09 on 05/02/2012
We don't need of their point of view, the our is so perfect and trusty !
12:43 on 05/02/2012
It somewhat restored my belief in America when I read some of the comments to this story in the New York Times this morning. Many actually supported Russia and China using their veto against a very one sided motion, in fact quite a lot of letters questioned how these 'rebels' were getting their sophisticated weapons Of course anyone who has followed Wikileaks know this to be CIA, it was revealed in Wikileaks last February that the CIA was recruiting and arming mercenaries for an uprising in Syria! Thank you Russia and China for trying to avoid further bloodshed. Now pehaps the United Nations will force these 'rebels' to attend a peace conference, something they have refused to do for months prefering to kill and maim innocent people in their lust to topple the government at any cost to human life!
03:57 on 06/02/2012
Thanks for the 411 - I missed that & it doesn't surprize me @ all that "our" CIA is involved. Par for the course.
11:12 on 05/02/2012
In Europe we have all had to fight long and hard for centuries to gaign our civil liberties with endless wars and a lot of blood spilt and endless misery, until we reached to status quo we have today. There is nothing wrong with other countries wanting to strive for the same aim of democratic self determination. The danger is of course that instead of a people's democracy something else may well take over like radicalism so creating a state of affairs that would have no satisfactory solutions. This would then create another conflict and so on. Until such time as all of the insurgents are united for a common democratic goal this state of semiwar situation will carry on without any satisfacotory results. As we have seen in the past most are united while fighting with huge differences when it comes to the negotiating table in an effort to form a government. Examples are for all of us to see with endles stalemates.
17:19 on 05/02/2012
You're right, that the question remain what kind of situation these countries will get after these "démocratic" transition. How many new countries in European Union are within thise democraty for decades but the people get only 200£/month; a lot of joblessness, social problems, a very high level of criminality compared to the soviete period and things are getting worse with thise crisise. So perhaps all these anti-gov protests was not worth it if eventualy they have to end up like Roumania, Hungaria or Poland, or worse Irak.
10:25 on 05/02/2012
Why is the UK and US so interested in toppling Assad? I mean if you look at the larger picture would it affect China and Russia influence in the middle east? Is that why?,I think China and Russia have probably realized that the UK,US and maybe a little of Israel want complete control of the middle east.

If Iran fell then China and Russia would be at the complete mercy of the 3 western countries who by proxy would be controlling the oil.

That would mean all the middle eastern countries would have regimes that would be "western friendly"

It is going to be very interesting in the next year on how far the UK,US and Israel will go and what final draw in the sand by Russia and China.
10:19 on 05/02/2012
The UN is being used to follow an agenda of blacking any countries leaders that do not conform to the ways and wishes of the west. It would seem that any country that is or has been a threat to Israel is being given this treatment, the question is why ? There are many more undemocratic countries who have not come under the scrutiny of the UN. Russia and China could have a point refusing to back this resolution, as you cannot have one rule for some and another for others, that is not democratic.
15:02 on 05/02/2012
what a load off crap since when has syria been a threat to israel they have took on the might off syria and its allys time and time again .In fact in the last two wars israel was ready to march into cairo and damascus but was stopped by the americans and russians [poking there noses in especially as the egyptian army was competely cut off and the syrian army turned tale and ran its time the west kept out off other countries affairs
10:16 on 05/02/2012
Russia and China have been murdering and imprisoning their own people for decades
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jimbraid1
15:35 on 05/02/2012
Absolutely spot on Gerry, more Russians killed by Russians and more Chinese killed by Chinese than there was Jews killed by Hitler. I wonder if the Russians will still support China when that country looks North at the oil and gas fields and decide that they want them ?.
03:59 on 06/02/2012
Stalin killed 20 million of his own people.
09:59 on 05/02/2012
Not worth posting a comment being american they (the huffapuff post) block anything that the CIA would not like
10:27 on 05/02/2012
I will not mention the countries but both of these regimes have been abusing their own people for decades (now I wonder if this comment will get through)
09:17 on 05/02/2012
Firstly..the "UNITED" nations, what a joke.A group of over paid, over powered men with only one thing on their minds,personal gain.Russia and China are super forces and have quietly gained a dominant role within the world,whilst we have been running around sticking our noses into affairs that had nothing to do with us.
I am sick and tired of the UK sticking it's nose into every countries affairs.Maybe once we know how to run our country successfully and safely we can preach to others.
We bait trouble and encourage all the aggrieved to come here and take political revenge.
We have the Olympics in a few months time and we all know what a fiasco that will turn out to be thanks to politics.
08:56 on 05/02/2012
“What happened in Libya has been a real wake-up call for the international community that these resolutions can lead to wars – and that they are not going to be easy to pass in the future.â€

­The UN has been hijacked by the US and NATO, says Rick Rozoff of the Stop NATO group.
“The very name of the international community has been appropriated by the US and its NATO allies – now including the Arab league,†he told RT.
Syria Tribune editor Ali Mohamad told RT that he doesn't believe the Western backers of a UN Security Council resolution on Syria "are working for the best interests of the Syrian people.â€
Mohamad says “there was a very good chance this week to find a draft that could satisfy all sides – but it was not supported by Western countries.â€
â€The Arab league initiative, supported by the Security Council, wants to portray an image where the problem is between Assad and the Syrian people, but this is not the reality
Instead, Mohamad says, the problem lies between opposing parts of Syrian society – and has nothing to do with Assad's removal
Well done China and Russia The Nato Gang has been stopped,the UN has a future.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:27 on 05/02/2012
"[I]n support of their own national interests." All opposition to the Syrian - or any - regime is based solely on self-interest, even supporting "brutal suppression." Hypocrisy knows no bounds.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NOSHER
08:20 on 05/02/2012
i think the reason they are vetoeing it is because they dont want it to happen in there country but my own oppinion is why is our mps spouting off and causing more trouble or wars its not them who have to fight they just fire the bullets to cause the fights can they not keep out of other peoples affairs we know its wrong but can the arabs not sort it out theres plenty of them